June 3
Template:Infobox Looney Tunes Cartoons episode
- Template:Infobox Looney Tunes Cartoons episode ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Fork of Template:Infobox television episode, I don't believe there's any reason that the articles that use this fork cannot use the primary episode template. -- /Alex/21 23:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Come on, it’s used as the Infobox the shorts of Looney Tunes Cartoons, get it through your skull!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evelynkwapong539 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- I know what it's used for. Why can you not use Template:Infobox television episode? Template forks should not exist without a very good reason other than "it's used". -- /Alex/21 23:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Tried it in editing mode, and it just did not work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evelynkwapong539 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- That does not support the creation of a fork. This template is causing pages to be listed under Category:Pages using infobox television episode with unknown parameters. -- /Alex/21 09:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Tried it in editing mode, and it just did not work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evelynkwapong539 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- I know what it's used for. Why can you not use Template:Infobox television episode? Template forks should not exist without a very good reason other than "it's used". -- /Alex/21 23:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Renaissance music manuscript English sources
- Template:Renaissance music manuscript English sources ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
- Template:English Virginalist School ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Propose merging Template:Renaissance music manuscript English sources with Template:English Virginalist School.
The virginal books are such an important part of the English Virginal school that I had already put them in the "English Virginalist School" template. It seems pointless to have the exact same information in the "Renaissance music manuscript English sources" one as well. Aza24 (talk) 22:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Joanne tracks
- Template:Joanne tracks ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Redundant – all tracks with articles are already included in the navbox Template:Lady Gaga songs, and Template:Extra track listing states that this template should not be used if a navbox is already on the page that lists the songs. Richard3120 (talk) 20:54, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Template:Extra track listings should only be used if a majority of the tracks are linked to existing articles and if the songs are not linked in an exisitng navbox (see Template:Infobox song#Track listing examples). This template falis both. —Ojorojo (talk) 13:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Artpop tracks
- Template:Artpop tracks ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Redundant – all tracks with articles are already included in the navbox Template:Lady Gaga songs, and Template:Extra track listing states that this template should not be used if a navbox is already on the page that lists the songs. Richard3120 (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Template:Extra track listings should not be used if the linked songs are already included in an existing navbox (see Template:Infobox song#Track listing examples). —Ojorojo (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Born This Way tracks
- Template:Born This Way tracks ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Redundant – all tracks with articles are already included in the navbox Template:Lady Gaga songs, and Template:Extra track listing states that this template should not be used if a navbox is already on the page that lists the songs. Richard3120 (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Template:Extra track listings should not be used if the linked songs are already included in an existing navbox (see Template:Infobox song#Track listing examples). —Ojorojo (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:The Fame Monster tracks
- Template:The Fame Monster tracks ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Redundant – all tracks with articles are already included in the navbox Template:Lady Gaga songs, and Template:Extra track listing states that this template should not be used if a navbox is already on the page that lists the songs. Richard3120 (talk) 20:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Template:Extra track listings should not be used if the linked songs are already included in an existing navbox (see Template:Infobox song#Track listing examples). —Ojorojo (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:The Fame tracks
- Template:The Fame tracks ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Redundant – all tracks with articles are already included in the navbox Template:Lady Gaga songs, and Template:Extra track listing states that this template should not be used if a navbox is already on the page that lists the songs. Richard3120 (talk) 20:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Template:Extra track listings should only be used if a majority of the tracks are linked to existing articles and if the songs are not linked in an exisitng navbox (see Template:Infobox song#Track listing examples). This template falis both. —Ojorojo (talk) 13:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Infobox reality talent competition
- Template:Infobox reality talent competition ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
- Template:Infobox reality competition season ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Propose merging Template:Infobox reality talent competition into Template:Infobox reality competition season, because both are infoboxes for a season of a reality competition and per WP:INFOCOL. TheTVExpert (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom, the merging of the "talent competition" infobox into the "competition season" infobox. The latter is a module within the normal television season infobox, so we should maintain that functionality and add in whatever other parameters would be necessary from the former. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support: See no issues with the merger of the two. GUtt01 (talk) 09:28, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support: They're both "reality competition" for a reason and mostly sharing the same parameters. TVSGuy (talk) 12:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support: To alleviate confusion over which one to use. werldwayd (talk) 03:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:The Legend of Zelda chronology
- Template:The Legend of Zelda chronology ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Per recent discussions at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Unnecessary templates, this template should be hardcoded and live at The Legend of Zelda series page, not duplicated across every game article. Its width also interferes with accessibility on mobile and read-aloud devices. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 00:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Consensue is already pretty strong on what to do here, this is borderline WP:G6 really. Sergecross73 msg me 00:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. JOEBRO64 00:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The Zelda chronology is complex enough to merit a visual aid, but it's best suited to a single, hard-coded inclusion on the series page rather than included on every game's page, since the individual games rarely have connections to more than one or two others— which makes including the full chronology unnecessary. — Kawnhr (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Kawnhr. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 04:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Donkey Kong chronology
- Template:Donkey Kong chronology ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Per recent discussions at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Unnecessary templates, the fictional "chronology" of DK video games basically duplicates the release order in real life and therefore, this template does not add any value when on articles that already have the main DK navigation template, which should be all of the linked articles. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Absolutely nothing "chronological" about this. Donkey Kong is not a plot-centric franchise by any means, and this "chronology" is quite literally just a list of DK games by order of release. This serves no purpose. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 00:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Fictional chronology of a video game series with almost zero plot present. Wikia-like cruft. Sergecross73 msg me 00:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. JOEBRO64 00:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Kawnhr (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Donkey Kronology. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 02:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 04:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Xenoblade Chronicles chronology
- Template:Xenoblade Chronicles chronology ( · talk · history · links · transclusions · logs · subpages · delete)
Per recent discussions at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Unnecessary templates, this template doesn't really show a chronological relationship between three video games that take place in three separate continuities. It's also not really necessary to navigate between so few articles. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Axem Titanium: Small correction: Xenoblade Chronicles and Xenoblade Chronicles 2 chronologically happen at the same time across two different dimensions, and in-game events are linked. Xenoblade Chronicles X however, is in a different continuity, as already noted on the template. The fact that editors (and hence readers) keep getting this wrong just illustrates the need to have the containing sidebar in the series' article. ~ Arkhandar (message me) 00:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - this “chronology” is useless. There’s only three video games and one can’t even be connected to the others. There’s not even enough to call it a chronology. There’s no flow, just some names in white space. And all that isn’t even taking into effect that these WP:INU chronologies are generally discouraged anyways, even without its glaring conceptual flaws. Sergecross73 msg me 00:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Sergecross. This template is utterly pointless, there is nothing "chronological" about this whatsoever and comes of as WP:FANCRUFT. This series has three games, and the plot of them can easily be explained in the text. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 00:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. JOEBRO64 00:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. As said, four games across three separate continuities do not merit a visual or navigational aid. I understand that XB 1 and 2's worlds have some story connection, but I do not think this this table makes that apparent to anyone who doesn't already have knowledge of the series, nor that it cannot be covered just as well by prose within the relevant articles. — Kawnhr (talk) 02:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and others. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 04:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)