Talk page for coups and self-coups
Hi, I saw you make an edit regarding an issue under discussion on Template:Coup d'état, but you have not posted anything on the talk page. I invite you to go to Template_talk:Coup_d'état#Post_discussion_comment to discuss the matter.—Beneficii (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Secularism in Thailand
A tag has been placed on Category:Secularism in Thailand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Tagging pages for deletion
Hello, KingSkyLord,
Just a reminder that any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD or AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you should post a notice on the talk page of the page creator informing them of the tagging. Often times, there is something they can do to alleviate whatever problem exists. If you use Twinkle, the program will do this automatically for you once you set up your Preferences so I encourage you to use it if you don't. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Illinois–Michigan football series reverts
I observe that you are an editor whose focus includes standardization -which is a great thing. That said, I have reverted you on multiple occasions for either insufficient review of the content you are editing, or persisting with further edits which have been already shown to you via CFB project Talk links to be against CFB project consensus.
Moving Illinois–Michigan football series to Illinois–Michigan football rivalry is another example and marks the second time with this specific article.[1]
This article was created by one of the most experienced editors in the CFB project and has been "a series" since 3 days after creation.[2] Subsequently there have been 3 prior reverts of article moves[3] with reverts of your identical page moves now marking the 4th and now 5th reverts.[4]
Your prior edit summaries of the article moves are "series? seriously? and "Moving the title because the article basically describes the match-ups as a rivalry"[5]
By my count, only 3 of 79 citations reference that term or variations thereof. As such, currently it would be inappropriate to retitle. UW Dawgs (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Moving page for 1997 Cambodian coup
You are encouraged to join the discussion on moving the page 1997 armed clashes in Cambodia to 1997 Cambodian coup d'état. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 18:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Good article drive notice
Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive The March 2021 GAN Backlog Drive begins on March 1, and will continue until the end of the month. Please sign up to review articles and help reduce the backlog of nominations! |
-- For the drive co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Biden cabinet
Template:Biden cabinet has been nominated for merging with Template:Biden personnel, Cabinet-level child-template. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Specifically, on three prior occasions on your Talk page, you were made aware of and shown the existing CFB consensus around navbox formatting.
- 21:38, 1 June 2020
- 22:55, 3 June 2020 and "If you would like to change current consensus, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football would be a good venue."
- 04:56, 2 July 2020 and "As noted above, there is a (linked) venue to discuss your preference and attempt to change the current consensus, if you are inclined."
Additionally, you have been similarly made aware of this issue on multiple occasions via edit summaries and reverts of identical edits. Today, you resumed refactor of navboxes in an identical manner per your apparent preference and against CFP project consensus.[6] This edit has also been reverted per consensus.
This behavior is WP:Disruptive editing and you should desist. If you would like to change consensus, the venue is linked above. UW Dawgs (talk) 01:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:2019 FA Cup final programme.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:2019 FA Cup final programme.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 1992 Southern Illinois Salukis football team has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1983 in Houston
A tag has been placed on Category:1983 in Houston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ugandan anti-communists
A tag has been placed on Category:Ugandan anti-communists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Vaush for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaush until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Deku link (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Category:Guinean expatriate basketball people in the United States has been nominated for merging
Category:Guinean expatriate basketball people in the United States has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 16:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American classical liberals
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:American classical liberals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 December 2. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
List of Primeira Liga hat-tricks
Hey KingSkyLord. Can you help me improving this page by adding the remaining players/seasons? I changed the tables, added some info in the header, updated a few more seasons and, last but not least, I removed the "fa" from the table that you talked in the talk page. P3DRO (talk) 10:09, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1999 FA Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1999 FA Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 18:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1999 FA Cup Final
The article 1999 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1999 FA Cup Final for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2000 FA Charity Shield
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2000 FA Charity Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Australian rules football clubs disestablished in 1881
A tag has been placed on Category:Australian rules football clubs disestablished in 1881 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2000 FA Charity Shield
The article 2000 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2000 FA Charity Shield for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1999 FA Cup Final
The article 1999 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1999 FA Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2000 FA Charity Shield
The article 2000 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2000 FA Charity Shield for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waweru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kikuyu.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Don't touch my page
Who told you could edit my user page and not inform me on my talk page? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
John Robinson (American football coach)
KingSkyLord, I just reverted your last edit on John Robinson (American football coach). I've noticed a number of edit sof this sort of that you've made on other bio articles. There are a couple problems with these edits. First, the navbox group heading you're introducing ("...awards, championships, and honors") is inappropriate because the navboxes there also include positional tenure navboxes like Template:USC Trojans football coach navbox. A grouping with no custom title, like that found at Bo Schembechler, would be better. Second, sorting an article 'scategories in chronological order is not a good practice. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 01:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Hawkins (American football) (July 25)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremy Hawkins (American football) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeremy Hawkins (American football), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, KingSkyLord!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clarityfiend (talk) 06:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
|