Cult Beauty draft
Thank you so much for pointing out the tone on my Cult Beauty draft. I've deleted some of the more positive language and reformatted the page. Is this now suitable for re-submission or should I make other changes? Thanks for your help. Mediocre Marshmallow (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- Mediocre Marshmallow, hi, I generally don't review articles more than once. If you think you have addressed the issue go ahead and resubmit and another editor will have a look! Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Question from Septdxb (19:48, 11 August 2021)
Hello. How can I publish my edits. Thank you. --Septdxb (talk) 19:48, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Septdxb, it looks like you have already published two edits! One thing to bear in mind is that you should always cite your sources for your edits. A guide to creating references in the Visual Editor can be found at Help:VisualEditor#Adding_a_new_reference. Good luck and let me know if you have any more questions! Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:16, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Review on Wikipedia page Michal Novotny (curator)
Dear Calliopejen1 Many thanks for your reviews. I would like to understand how regarding the fact Michal Novotny was the director of the most important contemporary art place in Czech Republic (Futura) and is now the Director of the Modern and contemporary art collection of the biggest museum in Czech Republic (National Gallery), doesn't make it enough "notable" for a wikipedia article .
Regarding the article you are cited, I would be glad to add this part. Let me know if you have any further tips to improve.
Many thanks for your time Cordially
- @Juliebaie: I actually expected to be accepting the article when I saw his positions, but there were essentially no good sources about him cited, and I found very few additional sources when I searched. Wikipedia judges notability based on press coverage. Please add to the article high-quality independent reliable sources discussing him and his career trajectory. These would be magazine or newspaper articles (not interviews though). By the way, adding additional low-quality articles will not help you, so beware of doing that. I say this because that's what often happens... We don't need any more articles where he is mentioned. We need articles that discuss him for at least a few paragraphs. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Dear Calliopejen1, I am super grateful for your precise feedbacks. I added 3 articles. I hope it will be ok. Anyway again thank you for your time and words. Cordially Julie
Request on 14:38:46, 13 August 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by BaltimoreReporter
- BaltimoreReporter (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Baltimore Fishbowl ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
My submission for a page about Baltimore Fishbowl was declined about a week ago. Calliopejen1 said the page submission was declined because the references "do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject." However, the page references multiple reliable secondary sources' coverage of Baltimore Fishbowl's work, including Baltimore Fishbowl's story on cannabis arrests (which was written/talked about in The Baltimore Sun, WYPR, CityLab and others) as well as Baltimore Fishbowl being awarded several "Best of Baltimore" wins by Baltimore Magazine. Can you further explain why these references do not meet the criteria for significant coverage? Other news outlets, such as the Baltimore Brew (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltimore_Brew) have fewer references but still have a page. That is not to say that their page submission should not have been accepted (it certainly should as they are a valuable local news source), but so should Baltimore Fishbowl.
BaltimoreReporter (talk) 14:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- BaltimoreReporter, The newspapers simply mentioning that the Fishbowl did some reporting (or summarizing reporting by the Fishbowl) does not count toward notability. What we are looking for is several sources that discuss the Fishbowl as a news website generally in some depth-- say, a few paragraphs each. When and why did it start? Who founded it, and what is their background? What sort of journalism do they typically do? We need sources that discuss these sorts of things (again, in some depth) to be able to write an article. The "best of" article is the closest you have, but it's borderline, and it's only one source. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
How do I change my email?
Hello again Callopejen1, I have another question: How do I change my Email? Thank you.
- @Twilight Sparkle 222: Click "preferences" in the upper right corner, then scroll down to "email options". Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:27, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks so much! You're a great mentor. Twilight Sparkle 222 (talk) 22:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agriculture in Qatar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pearling.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Please help!
Hello @Calliopejen1: I am writing you because you have been involved with the ongoing debate between me and cristodelosgitanos. I know as an administrator it is one of your jobs to uphold the guidelines and make sure everyone feels safe and respected especially when it comes to protected attributes. I am afraid if I go to ANI he will accuse me of doing this in order to stop consensus but that is simply not true so I am coming to you here first since you’ve been generally neutral and to make it clear this has nothing to do with the Flamenco page, the worst insults actually came from an entirely different page. Ever since cristodelosgitanos has first started editing he has continually harassed me and my colleagues with personal attacks and threats. He has made it extremely unpleasant for me to edit on Wikipedia because of these constant personal attacks and has taken it too far. He constantly assumes my outside identity and attacks me and my intelligence for it. I simply cannot go on with addressing him after what he has said to me as it has deeply offended me on another level, so this is just to alert you that until this is resolved I will only be responding to you as I did not come on this website to get harassed. He has attacked my nationality, character, ethnicity, and race, even when most of his assumptions were wrong while I have never once mentioned anything about his personal background at all. I have warned him so many times to stop with the personal attacks but he has continued and has now crossed the line with the most offensive thing you could ever tell a Romani person like myself. Here are just a few examples:
- ”Indian nationalist”
- “you are out of your depth on this topic”
- ”a topic you are not familiar with since it does not pertain to your ethno-linguistic domain.”
- ”I am quite convinced you do not speak Spanish, you have never been to Spain nor know anything about Spanish/ Andalusian culture or Flamenco. Yet you insist on pushing a false narrative in this article because of your interest in Romani activism and need to appropriate flamenco for your particular cause.”
- ”hippy blogger”
- ”Rosamaria Cisneros-Kostic is and ACTIVIST from somewhere in the midwest. They are basically hippies which are the only sources you seem capable of providing. Please give me a break. These people are not reliable. They teach dancing and hippy stuff in third rate universities in the US.” Also goes on to attack a Calé Roma Dr. Rosamaria Cisneros Kostic calling her a hippie, a “figure” and “colorful character” as well as continuing with the clear anti-American rhetoric(Both Dr. Kostic Cisneros and Me are not from the USA but regardless)
- ”In the long run, its a lost cause.” Threatens me to stop editing and defending my position also threatens to edit war if I don’t follow his specific guidelines, which are contrary to Wikipedia guidelines
- he goes on the reliable source/NPOV noticeboard and calls me an activist user in a derogatory way
- accusing me of lying about knowing Spanish
- ”nor are your conspiracy theories relevant here.”
- ”I really don't think an editor who until a few days ago thought that Flamenco was a "dance" and has been pitching pseudo-academics as "Flamenco historians" should be the one to decide which sources are "independent".
And here is where it gets even worse beyond just petty attacks:
- He come on MY talk page and threatens me to not make anymore edits relating to gitanos ”Por tus ediciones a mi m queda bastante claro que en tu vida has estado en nuestro pais ni has conocido a un gitano.” (From you edits it’s has become abundantly clear that in your life you have never left your country nor have you every met a gitano) and yes I translated that myself
- ”gringo que jamas ha salido de su pais” [1] He insulted my cultural literacy by calling me a derogatory Mexican slang term for White Americans and saying I’ve never left my country. Note that i’m am neither White nor American but trying to expose and attack someone’s personal background regardless if they are right or wrong is against Wikipedia guidelines.
- and worst of all this comment right here where he crossed the line and disrespected me beyond belief:[2] “I'm quite familiar with white americans adopting fanciful identities such as cherokee or romani.” He called me a White American pretending to be Romani, this is the biggest Insult you could ever tell a Rom, not only is he wrongly assuming my personal background, he has attacked me in the worst way possible and has literally made Wikipedia a living hell for me to edit. I have warned him multiple times to stop with the personal attacks but he won’t stop. Please do something about this, at least talk to him or give him a warning, I will not address him at all until he stops with the personal attacks and issues a formal apology. I am not overreacting, he has insulted me in the highest degree possible. He has continually used condescending language and practiced general incivility with me but this is too far. I know Wikipedia is supposed to be a professional place where Editors do not get attacked on protected attributes such as Race. Nationality and Ethnicity, please at least give him a warning. Sincerely, TagaworShah (talk) 23:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm happy to say something to him, though I don't want to be the arbiter of your personal dispute to the extent it will interfere with my ability to help with the content dispute. Some of the things above are fine, and some cross the line (mostly the ones relating to your personal background cross the line). If you take this to ANI, I advise you to highlight the following: ”Indian nationalist” (this one is borderline), "a topic you are not familiar with since it does not pertain to your ethno-linguistic domain" (possibly bad, hard to tell out of context... you may want to add some context to this one), "Por tus ediciones a mi m queda bastante claro que en tu vida has estado en nuestro pais ni has conocido a un gitano" (this is mostly bad because it is irrelevant), "gringo que jamas ha salido de su pais" (i'd say this crosses the line to a personal attack but it is somewhat minor IMO, especially I'm not sure that a Spaniard using the word "gringo" is necessarily using it with a negative connotation... but again this violates the rule to comment on edits, not editors), "I'm quite familiar with white americans adopting fanciful identities such as cherokee or romani" (this is bad and irrelevant). Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Calliopejen1: Thank you so much! I just wanted to run it by an involved administrator first to make sure this doesn’t get misinterpreted as me trying to prevent consensus in our flamenco discussion, imo the worst attacks were on completely different pages. I agree that you becoming the arbitrator of this dispute might hamper consensus, I will now take this to ANI thank you for the tips!TagaworShah (talk) 23:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- TagaworShah, thanks. I left a note on his talk page but I'm hoping that others can take it from here to the extent necessary. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Calliopejen1: Thank you so much! I just wanted to run it by an involved administrator first to make sure this doesn’t get misinterpreted as me trying to prevent consensus in our flamenco discussion, imo the worst attacks were on completely different pages. I agree that you becoming the arbitrator of this dispute might hamper consensus, I will now take this to ANI thank you for the tips!TagaworShah (talk) 23:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Question from Aditya, fire. on Natural resource (17:06, 3 September 2021)
Hello --Aditya, fire. (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- Aditya, fire., hi! do you have a question I can answer for you? Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations from WikiProject Articles for Creation!
The Articles for Creation Barnstar & The Teamwork Barnstar | ||
Congratulations! You have earned The Articles for Creation Barnstar and The Teamwork Barnstar for reviewing an outstanding 267 drafts and doing 29 re-reviews during the WikiProject Articles for creation July 2021 Backlog Drive. Also, well done for scoring 8th place overall. Thank you for your work to improve Wikipedia! On behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation, Enterprisey (talk!) 00:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC) |
Request to review and helping to resolve issues
Hi, Would you please review the draft:Seyed Ali Jaberi and helping to resolve issues? WPooya (talk) 06:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- WPooya, Hi, this is not an area of interest for me, so I won't be able to help out much. My two comments are: 1) it looks very similar to the article about him that was deleted last year. You may want to add a comment at the top of the page indicating how it is different. 2) I see references in Farsi that are listed only with their English-language titles. This is a bad idea because if the link goes dead we want to be able to search for the reference. The "title" parameter in the reference is for the original title (i.e. Farsi) and the "trans-title" parameter is for an English translation. Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:51, 7 September 2021 (UTC)