This editor has been awarded the Citation Barnstar
This editor has been awarded the Working Man's Barnstar
This editor has been awarded the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Nowhere near as active as I used to be – mostly due to being busy doing other things, but also because Wikipedia as a community has proven itself absolutely incapable of:
understanding and following it's own policies/guidelines (particularly WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:NOT, WP:C); allowing small groups of editors to consistently violate or abuse these fundamentals harms the project immeasurably
applying WP:NOTDEM/WP:VOTE consistently, especially in areas such as WP:XFD, where groups of editors often sway outcomes by weight of numbers and WP:GAMING tactics (including by administrators!!) despite their non-policy/guideline based WP:ATA !votes; closers who correctly weight the arguments routinely get accused of WP:SUPERVOTING
producing coherent subject notability guidelines; as with most areas, groups of editors who share a narrow interest produce distorted results, such as criteria that justify articles with zero chance of ever having any WP:GNG-level sourcing and facilitate bot-like mass-creation of worthless micro-stubs (essentially nothing more than database entries) and synthesis from bare statistics; attempts to improve guidelines are generally countered by various WP:GAMING tactics (including by administrators!!)
differentiating between speculation, opinions and facts, often in violation of WP:NPOV/WP:CRYSTAL (N.B. opinion pieces are only reliable sources of the authors opinion; one person's truth ≠ fact)
identifying and dealing with editors (including administrators!!) who are WP:NOTHERE; examples includes
those who WP:PLAYPOLICY to pursue personal goals/crusades, largely to the detriment of the encyclopedia, and
WP:MOS warriors who WP:PLAYPOLICY in their quest to enforce their own preferences, disregarding guidelines such as MOS:VAR
likely paid editors who participate almost exclusively at AFD, mostly benignly following the snow, before defending questionable articles en-masse or switching focus to push a particular POV in a controversial topic area
addressing any of its fundamental problems
All of which (at times) makes it a rather unpleasant and frustrating experience.