I'm Vami_IV, Coordinator of WikiProject Germany and enthusiast for winter environs. My areas of interest are the arts, history, geography, WikiGnoming, and copyright investigations.
As a Wikipedia editor, I understand that my goal is the destruction of my purpose.
My off-wiki confederates, who have fed references to me or helped with translations. I can never thank any of you enough for lending me your time and resources.
Mamelsberg
HrcAK47
TacError
The volunteer fan translators of the Hololive community
SuperHamster: "I'm proposing a new adage: the longer a response is proportional to the original post, the more ridiculous that response will be. If the response to an 80 word message is 500 words it ain't gonna be good."
Johnbod: "5 refs on a line is almost always a sure sign of trouble."
General rule of thumb: The vocabulary of an author is critical. This may seem obvious, but really study it. Does a source describe a warrior culture as "savages"? Are violent ruffians described as boot strap-pulling adventurers? Does your source glorify violence, or romanticize a conflict or area of one? Pay attention to these things. Especially if they paint over or outright ignore well-documented fact.
Kill-on-sight sources
Thomas Goodrich (War to the Knife, Scalp Dance, etc.). Pro-Confederate bias. Possible racism.
J. Evetts Haley. Pro-Confederate, racist. Manifest destiny cultist.
CCI case subject copies their own work into Wikipedia
Good faith contributor who just doesn't understand copyright
Article is a clear G12
CCI case subject is under discretionary sanctions
Can't track down source for whatever reason
Copyright violation still in article after 5+ years
Two or more CCI case subjects in the same edit history
Just plain copypasta
FREE ??? SPACE
"Why aren't you blocked?"
Cleanup blasts the article to the Stub Age
Copied-from source is behind a paywall you can't climb over
Awful attempt at paraphrasing to get around Earwig's
Case has been open for years
CCI subject is the main author of the article you're cleaning
Sockpuppet party in the edit history
90+% match on Earwig's is a lazy mirror site or SEO
Mountain of overquoting
Copyright violator is blocked
COI editor
Translation copyvio
Good Article
===Opening statement===
Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will ''only'' make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. '''The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality.''' For responding to my comments, please use {{Done}}, {{Fixed}}, {{Added}}, {{Not Done}}, {{Doing}}, or {{Removed}}, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –~~~~
Committed identity: ac5ed4745743e218e2bb034d7bc7c7260a83946617a55cf4f6e427b8918384f8f155d73bb6e7ed38f72c78c50f1ae796841c1e56109ca7f351085ec31196a0ac is a SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.