Contents
Merry Christmas!
![]() |
Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
Mario Maker 2 mode of gameplay
I've left a reply on what you posted on my talk page, please take a look at it (not to mention I find it quite rude that you have accused me of vandalism) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.63.92 (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- I've not accused you of vandalism. I've accused you of disruption after you've made the same edit multiple times over several weeks. -- ferret (talk) 19:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, well I apologise there, that's my mistake. But you have still accused me of using rumours as sourced despite the fact I was citing the official page - see the talk page for Super Mario Maker 2.92.236.63.92 (talk) 19:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
Got your message, but thought to message you directly. As I posted on the talk page, I thought to justify some of my FFXIV editing by showing Ibberd not to be a bit character as Axem Titanium referenced him due to how he progress the storyline as a "Knight of Cerebus"-type of villain. The first being theinfamous "regicide" in 2.5 where Ibberd chopped off Raubhan's arm and turned the Crystal Braves on the Scions, starting at 1:35:22, then acting against Lolorito in 3.0 to execute Raubhan as a "traitor" to their nation, and finally Iberd unmasked as the Griffon before committing suicide while using the aether in Nidhogg's Eyes (which the Ascian got in the 3.3 epilogue) and his subordinates' dying prayers to create Shinryu in the first half of 3.5.2603:9000:7D0A:8C00:934:7319:9A57:C47D (talk) 22:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- The best place to discuss the direct changes you want to make on the article will be the article's talk page, so that more editors can see it and reply. In this case, Talk:Final Fantasy XIV is where you want to go to discuss any important missing plot points. -- ferret (talk) 22:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi There, thank you for blocking that user I wont say what ip to keep their privacy it was starting to get annoying!! many thanks ~~ JJBullet 14:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Ridley
Hey there. I saw that you've been working a little bit on Ridley (Metroid) along with 999999 other things as always. I saw that you had reverted some blatant fancruft including links to wikia. Sadly this kind of topic needs a bridge between an encyclopedia and a fansite. :-/ I personally would like to officially link directly to wikia (whether as a citation or some other template) and I want to agree with the other editor's edit message in response to you, as a way to offload fandom. It sounds like he was intending wikia as a soft source in lieu of WP:RS. But there isn't one official way to offload fandom at wikipedia other than to delete it, and the wikia administration is kinda problematic and I hear that site has lost many of its wikis due to its admin behavior. Are we not allowed to put wikia in External links? It seems like there should be a template for that, like there is for findagrave and twitter lol. But anyway that's my semi-blubbering opinion. Luckily, Ridley has a fair amount of RS. Anyway I thought you might want to be aware in case of fandom resurgence, and might want to check that I didn't delete a WP:RS or such. No offense since you're so busy but I am honestly surprised that you put up with such extreme fandom in this particular article, and I just got Nintendonix banned for all the endless garbage WP:OR. I've never seen anyone else NOT ONLY mention WatchMojo over and over in countless articles but ALSO just not even bother to actually cite the dreck among all the carefully wikicoded WP:OR about it! — Smuckola(talk) 04:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Smuckola: "Soft unreliable references" belong in External Links I believe, which is where most articles have a Wikia link, if they have one. See {{Wikia}}. As far as Ridley goes, my only edit to that article was a single revert, which someone else had called my attention to I believe. I never reviewed the article any deeper. -- ferret (talk) 12:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
/* Games developed */
Why did you revert my edit on the Grey Matter Interactive article? Go to Moby Games, type in the games (Spider-Man 2000, True Crime: Streets of LA), click on Credits and choose Windows/PC to see who developed the ports. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westcoast1978 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Westcoast1978: That edit has been reverted multiple times by multiple editors for the same reason: There are two "Grey Matter" companies, and "Grey Matter Interactive" is not the one who did those. "LTI Gray Matter" is a different company. -- ferret (talk) 22:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Online video games
Hello, we are working on a student project in which we have to contribute to a wikipedia page. We thought we could feed the online video games page. Apparently you do not agree with our content. Is there a way we could improve what we did so it gets accepted ? Thank you for your answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AntoineHabis TPT (talk • contribs) 09:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- @AntoineHabis TPT: Use the article's talk page to discuss changes to the article. Multiple editors reverted you with stated reasons why, and you continued to disruptively restore your edit. Wikipedia has many guidelines and policies in place for content. No original research and the requirement to source content must be followed. For some reason, no one ever tells students doing classes on Wikipedia. -- ferret (talk) 12:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Bannerlord Vandalism
Hello! Can you please lock the Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord page indefinitely? ShimonChai (talk) 13:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- @ShimonChai: Looking at the log, it's been protected several times but usually for very short durations. Indef usually requires some clear ongoing disruption after longer and longer periods of protection. I went with a year, let's see if it actually continues after that. -- ferret (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- I am just glad that there is some action being taken that might make a change to the absurd amount of vandalism on the page. Thanks! ShimonChai (talk) 13:46, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
hey about beta dates
Hey sorry to bother But where would i input the beta date then? it has to be noted.. that 2 years of beta really ruined our Cal-league tournaments and must be pointed out.. same has wow 40h AV and week long maintnance.. people seem to have forgotten.. but i remember all that has if it was yesterday, when we realised we had wasted 8 months of practice to forfeit due to teammates not being able to connect.. steam nearly prekilled e-sports.. it sure did kill cal-league i actually wish it did lol i despise esports with a passion so it must be note.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minoumimi (talk • contribs) 18:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)