![]() Archives | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Contents
- 1 More redirects
- 2 disambig templates
- 3 Redirect request from Notafly
- 4 Autopatrolled granted
- 5 October 2018
- 6 Invitation to New AI-Labelling Campaign for Newcomer Sessions
- 7 ArbCom 2018 election voter message
- 8 Public holidays in Kurdistan listed at Redirects for discussion
- 9 Heliconisa edit
- 10 Precious anniversary
More redirects
I have identified these in Lycaenidae.Will you fix them please.
- Sipaea redirect to Nesiostrymon
- Sterosis redirect to Liphyra Westwood, 1864
- Sublysandra redirect to Polyommatus
- Tajuria berensis redirect to Tajuria berenis
- Terra redirect to Nesiostrymon Clench, 1964
- Tigrinota redirect to Arawacus
Always grateful for your help.Best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Notafly: Got 'm. Let me know if I misunderstood anything or there's anything else I can help with. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 02:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
disambig templates
Hi! I think the taxonomy templates work like this, for disambiguation. I'll use Lithocharis as an example.
- If there's a template "template:taxonomy/Lithocharis" that is used for lepidoptera, then there would need to be another such as "template:taxonomy/Lithocharis (beetle)" if one was needed for the beetle. The template name is used only for template disambiguation. The template name (the part after the slash, "Lithocharis" or "Lithocharis (beetle)") is used in the Speciesbox or Automatic taxobox. It doesn't necessarily have to be the same as the article name (but it might be less confusing that way.)
- If there's an article "Lithocharis" and an article "Lithocharis (beetle)", you can use the template "template:taxonomy/Lithocharis" for either one by specifying either "Lithocharis" or "Lithocharis (beetle)|Lithocharis" in the template's link field. In this case, if you want to use it for the beetle, the name "Lithocharis (beetle)" should not appear in the Speciesbox or Automatic taxobox, only "Lithocharis". The name in the Speciesbox or Automatic taxobox is for the template, not the article.
- It's not unusual to need a disambiguation name for both the template and article, in which case you need two templates (such as "template:taxonomy/Lithocharis" and "template:taxonomy/Lithocharis (beetle)", and in the link fields "Lithocharis" in one and "Lithocharis (beetle)|Lithocharis" in the other
Since there's not currently a template used for the lepidoptera Lithocharis, there really only needs to be one template, not both "template:taxonomy/Lithocharis" and "template:taxonomy/Lithocharis (beetle)"
...and, of course, I could be wrong on any of this. It's easy to get mixed up! Bob Webster (talk) 00:50, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Bob: I am not comfortable at all with the automatic taxoboxes system. I saw that there was a link from the beetle species Lithocharis ochracea to its genus which went in error to the moth genus Euparyphasma. I was pleased enough with myself that I was able to change that to a red link instead of the error. I would be in your debt if you could clean up after me as you described above. I am not now able to figure it out for myself. Thank you, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 04:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's all straight now (I think). Everything you did was correct from a content viewpoint, it just left an extra unused template file. I will point out that, while my explanation seemed perfectly clear when I wrote it, it sure is convoluted now!
- I'm happy to help with any template stuff I can. Feel free to let me know if you need anything or notice anything wrong. Bob Webster (talk) 04:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks and keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 14:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Redirect request from Notafly
Would you redirect Keraunogramma to Semanga Distant 1884 please. Best regards Notafly (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Got it. Thanx. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 18:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
Hi SchreiberBike, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! - TNT 💖 18:10, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- @There'sNoTime: Thanks. It makes sense to me, but you should be aware that by the letter of the law I am not eligible. It has been proposed three times before. See the bottom of this page. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 04:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Pseudozarba mianoides. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:54, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to New AI-Labelling Campaign for Newcomer Sessions
Hello, I'm reaching out to you because I saw that you signed up as a labelling volunteer at Wikipedia:Labels/Edit quality. I'm starting a new project that builds on Edit quality, to predict Newcomer quality. That is, to predict the damagingness and goodfaithness of "sessions" (multiple related edits) of users within 1 day of their registration. With this AI trained, we could help automatically distinguish betewen productive and unproductive new users. If you wouldn't mind taking a look at this new labelling campaign and label a few sessions I would be very grateful. In addition if you have any feedback or discover any bugs in the process I would appreciate that too. You can find the project page at Wikipedia:Labels/Newcomer_session_quality or go directly to labels.wmflabs.org/ui/enwiki/ and look for the campaign titled "Newcomer Session quality (2018)". Thanks so much!
Maximilianklein (talk) 20:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Public holidays in Kurdistan listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Public holidays in Kurdistan. Since you had some involvement with the Public holidays in Kurdistan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 15:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Heliconisa edit
Thanks very much for the edit on Heliconisa; I could not locate a similar article for a monotypic genus that also had an automatic taxobox, so was uncertain how it needed to be formatted. I'll make a note of this for future reference, I've seen a few other such cases and left them alone. Dyanega (talk) 01:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm slowly working out how and when to use {{Speciesbox}} and {{Automatic_taxobox}}; they are not self explanatory for me. Thanks for adding in the parentheses. I should have seen that. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 01:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
![]() | |
Five years! |
---|
Happy 2019 --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:46, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Wow! Thank you for the reminder. Five years is a long time on the Internet. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 19:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)