People are more important than Wikipedia. “
”
|
Topics are (or are not) notable. Articles adequately demonstrate a topic's notability, or they do not. A topic's notability does not depend on Wikipedia article content. “
”
|
(regarding oft-repeated arguments) That horse may not be dead yet, but it needs to be put out of its misery. “
”
|
- {{Alarm clock}}
- Dashboard
- Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books
- Commons talk, Commons watch list
![]() |
---|
6 September 2016 |
|
- This page last updated at 2016-09-26 10:12:31 PM UTC.
![]() Archives |
---|
To leave me a message, click on the tab at the top of the page. Be sure to add ~~~~ to your message so I know who you are.
Contents
Tech News: 2016-35
16:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Tech News: 2016-36
17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Tech News: 2016-37
18:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey Davidwr, I updated the WikiSymbols project proposal on which you commented recently. It is more like a total revision I would say, as the commission free money for contributors is not included anymore. I am a designer of icons myself, so I had more the designer perspective than the wiki-perspective or the perspective of the downloaders. Nevertheless it would be cool to create a central site for icons/symbols. I would be thankful for more feedback and contribution. See the up to date proposal here: https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiSymbols I want to adapt the proposal to the structure of the other ones (a table, more detailed explanations,...). Maybe you could contribute. cheers, GabrielVogel — Preceding unsigned comment added by GabrielVogel (talk • contribs) 21:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Tech News: 2016-38
22:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Tech News: 2016-39
18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)