|
Contents
- 1 Ebell
- 2 68.198.3.221
- 3 DYK for Kingston, Mississippi
- 4 Lessons learned
- 5 Alabama County election removals
- 6 External Links
- 7 US Merchant Marine Academy
- 8 SSBN entry
- 9 Hand warning
- 10 Election edits
- 11 Todd Youth
- 12 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 13 ANI notice
- 14 Mount Kisco
- 15 Trump in Little Women
- 16 Daigle, Maine
- 17 Mount Pleasant Iowa
- 18 Rtjfan/ARtking
- 19 Barnstar
Ebell
Please keep your Republican tags and opinion. I am concerned with the science. Be careful. If defending the tobacco industry is embarrassing to Ebell, you have no power to delete this chapter of his career. He is now a public figure, and his career is essential to his biography. Thank you. BatteryIncluded (talk) 01:44, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- I have left a message at User talk:Bishonen regarding your sloppy and bias edits. Magnolia677 (talk) 05:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- I saw that "climate change denier" has been used against you as well. Welcome to the club. As said, I could have been more friendly as well. Let us see what comes out of it. I doubt the end is nigh ;) Polentarion Talk 23:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Imagine what would happen to the Ann Coulter article if Trump makes her Secretary of State. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- I saw that "climate change denier" has been used against you as well. Welcome to the club. As said, I could have been more friendly as well. Let us see what comes out of it. I doubt the end is nigh ;) Polentarion Talk 23:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Point is, I got major flak for an article draft (and had to redraw it) that has been commented positively by Michael Oppenheimer. The guys here are much more radical than real world experts and they deny to comment on actual comparative research, e.g. about the difference between the dealings with Ozone depletion and global warming (this one the gang was not able to cope with). That said, I would abhor of Coulter as Secretary of State as well. But I am German (Christian democrat, pretty liberal in comparision) and we got different issues. I never thought in the past I would be much positive about Trump but I start to like him. Polentarion Talk 07:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
-
-
68.198.3.221
Hello, I noticed you reverted the edit I made.
There is no citation because there is a citation already listed. The text as written before with the citation was written in error by someone else. In New York State, peace officers do not need licenses to possess firearms unless there is a restriction placed on them in 2.10 of the CPL. At the end of every section listing the peace officers title, it will either end or also include "provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law."
Any title that doesn't have the above statement in quotes are authorized to carry firearms. I invite you to take a look at and see which titles are allowed to and which aren't here: http://ypdcrime.com/cpl/article2.htm
68.198.3.221 (talk) 00:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Kingston, Mississippi
— Maile (talk) 00:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Lessons learned
Hi Magnolia677! As the deletion saga is finally over, I propose we both reflect on the events. (Perhaps, even invite @John from Idegon: because he participated in the initial discussion.) Your nominations have prompted me to re-read the policies, and even though you ended up the only person in favor of 'delete', I believe that your nominations were somewhat justified, especially the nomination of The Concrete Herald in its then sophomoric state. I want to understand, however, why you dodged all my questions and attempts to reach out to you once it was apparent that all the problems were promptly fixed, and your initial reasoning was no longer applicable. I took these articles a long way since they were nominated, and I'd appreciate a dialogue. Please, stand in my shoes for a minute. It's quite upsetting and discouraging when somebody wants to destroy your work, especially if it's volunteer work. It's even more upsetting when you put additional effort and fix the problems, but the prompt to destroy your work remains, and all communication is shut down. Of course, this is not a position you want to be in, and I hope that is not a position that you'd want to put others in the future.
Getting back to the lessons learned, I'll definitely be more mindful at demonstrating notability right from the start. I also want to learn how to engage a more cooperative and engaging environment once a disagreement presents itself. Could you help me with this by reflecting on your position and reasoning? 凰兰时罗 (talk) 16:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- The original article had two sources, and one of them had no link. I went looking for my own sources and was unable to support the notability of either article. I'm glad things worked out for the articles. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Alabama County election removals
Hi Magnolia677! Thanks for taking the interest in the edits I had made on the Alabama Counties starting with B to include their relatively recent election results (since 2000). I apologise for not including citations for this work but I used the Autauga County as template and this did not have a citation. I notice you haven't been in and deleted that counties version.
As you can imagine as someone who has performed 1000's of edits and created many pages this took some time to collate, enter and I was about to work through the counties begin with C when I saw you had reverted everything I did yesterday. I have citations to enter so please can you restore my edits and I will add citations following your helpful guidance link. (The Batch (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC))
External Links
You sent me an alert about adding links to the names in communities. I came across a page that had links like I added. After seeing these links I starting changing the "red" links that went to "Creating ...". Since there was no info for the community, I thought I would add a link like I saw on another page. If I should not do this, I will stop. But I only did so because I saw it done elsewhere. Also if there are any other problems with the changes I've made let me know. I've only been doing this for a couple weeks. Is there a better way to respond to people. I couldn't find any. Jdtrue63Jdtrue63 (talk) 09:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- I have responded on your talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. I'm sorry if this is not the proper way to respond. I'm not familiar with this format and can't even remember how I sent you the last message. I started this by correcting a typo. Then I noticed how the pages didn't all stick to the same format, so I started making them look the same. Just the communities section since that's where my interest is right now. Is that okay or should I stop that also? Then I noticed that someone had linked some communities that didn't have wikipedia pages to an outside site. I thought that was a good idea and started doing that. Now I know not to. I was putting brackets on them to make them turn red before that. Is it okay to put the brackets on a community even if I have no intention of writing an article? I don't want to screw anything up and I don't want to get banned from the site (if that's possible), but I like things to be neat and orderly. Jdtrue63Jdtrue63 (talk) 10:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
US Merchant Marine Academy
HELLO! This is in regards to your message to me below:
"Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you made a change to an article, United States Merchant Marine Academy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)"
I'm brand new to adding content to Wikipedia. After looking at citation rules, it appears that a citation = a published writing. My content about the Department of Naval Science was based on the fact that I'm a Navy officer and was stationed there as the Assistant Officer in Charge of the Department. The content is much more accurate than referencing a source since I was in the thick of it!
Any guidance on how to proceed? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auggie.negele (talk • contribs) 23:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
SSBN entry
Hello! I saw that you undid my changes to the SSBN page too (due to not citing reference). The original article did not cite a reference in the part I changed. It was wrong. I was an officer stationed on the USS Michigan which had C-4 missiles (along with the other subs referenced) until going into the shipyards in 2004, beginning its refueling and overhaul into a SSGN. There is no way to reference this fact with a writing...and, as stated, the original article does not have a citation...it's just wrong.
Thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auggie.negele (talk • contribs) 00:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi there. Any editor is free to remove unsourced content. Both your edits involved the addition of new content, and Wikipedia has pretty tight rules about supporting new content with reliable sources (see Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Verifiability). This is not to imply that your personal experience isn't completely true or accurate, it just needs to be supported by a published source. Are you able to find a source online that can support your edits? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hand warning
Why would i be bloked if manchester is in UK ? 83.31.151.90 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Election edits
Hello, Magnolia677. I noticed that you reverted that change and some of the other election results for West Virginia counties that I contributed. I just wanted to let you know that there actually was a source for some of them, right after where it says "Presidential election results." If this source doesn't suffice, please let me know. Thanks! Isseubnida (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Todd Youth
He played with 2 major horror punk bands: Samhain (band) and Son of Sam. Would you accept leaving the "Horror punk musicians" category, considering this new information? Thank you! Merodack (talk) 04:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 01:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Mount Kisco
My apologies, you are right the big picture is too big. I only reverted your edit because I felt the formatting you laid out was too cluttered in the demographics section and the census data had no place on the left side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.192.122 (talk) 04:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Trump in Little Women
https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Little_Women/Chapter_44 search 'trump'. Ranze (talk) 09:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Magnolia re special:diff/750943727 now that I've explained it to you I'm going to add it back along with additional information. Jo also refers to Amy as a trump in Chapter 2: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Little_Women/Chapter_2 You can also see in http://www.mit.edu/people/kcunning/lilwomen/a2.html that Brooke is referred to as one. Ranze (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Ok then. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Daigle, Maine
Thanks for the offer of help! sure, I would love some tips. Thanks! Scarykitty (talk) 01:34, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Mount Pleasant Iowa
I added where Tom Vilsack was mayor and agriculture secretary. That is well known. You took it out saying unsourced. Any idiot knows he is. However, I now see your point. In Wikipedia, should everything be sourced or removed, if not sourced? Please respond. I am willing to help you out stamp out unsourced stuff. At first, I was mad at you but now I see we might be able to be a team in the sense of helping better Wikipedia. Lake of Milk (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Rtjfan/ARtking
Hello, Magnolia677. I noticed that Rtjfan seemed to create another account while the account was blocked for 72 hours. The current account, ARtking, has been similarly creating unsourced articles and adding unsourced content to articles, including BLP. ARtking is receiving the deletion nomination messages from other editors on a daily basis.
I'm not sure if EVADE or SCRUTINY can apply to this case and I don't know how to stop the user, but I think that the editor's behavior is still problematic and that it needs to be stopped sooner or later. Since you brought Rtjfan's case to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive937#Mass unsourced edits to rap music articles, I believe you can deal with the user in an appropriate manner. I just wanted to let you know that. Regards, 153.206.76.252 (talk) 04:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- This has been dealt with here. Thanks for the tip. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Barnstar
Thank you very much for the barnstar! I've been into these Memphis stuff lately and was surprised to see that a Wikipedia article was yet to be written. Glad to see it being appreciated :) Myxomatosis57 (talk) 15:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)