Featured and Good topics in Wikipedia A featured topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles).A good topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles) with a less stringent quality threshold than a featured topic. This page is for the nomination of potential featured and good topics. See the good and featured topic criteria for criteria on both types of topic. If you would like to ask any questions about your topic and the featured topic process before submitting it, visit Wikipedia talk:Featured topic candidates. Before nominating a topic, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Featured topic questions. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FTC/GTC process. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the articles of the topic should consult regular editors of the articles prior to nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. The featured topic director, GamerPro64, or his delegate Juhachi, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates topic and archived. You may want to check previous archived nominations first: |
Good content: Good and featured topic tools: |
Nomination procedureTo create a new nomination use the form below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Saffron/archive1) and click the "Create new nomination" button. Once the nomination page is created, remember to transclude it in the appropriate section below, to leave nomination templates on the talk pages of the articles nominated for the topic, and to create appropriate books (see Book:Jupiter for a good example). For detailed instructions on how to nominate topics or add articles to existing topics, see Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Nomination procedure. Supporting and objectingPlease review all the articles of the nominated topic with the featured topic criteria in mind before deciding to support or oppose a nomination. Following the creation of the book, NoomBot will create a book report (see example) containing details about cleanup issues (only those that have been flagged with cleanup templates, so it may not pick up everything), and various tools to inspect external links or resolve disambiguation pages. It can be a good idea to check the report and inspect links to see if certain articles need some cleanup (doing this before the nomination is even better).
For a topic to be promoted to featured topic status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. If enough time passes without objections being resolved (at least one week), nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. Nominations will stay here for ten days if there is unanimous consent, or longer if warranted by debate. |
Contents
Featured topic nominations
Overview of Lady Gaga
6 articles
Lady Gaga |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Except for her biography (I contributed to the article to some extent) and discography, I have been working on all of the other lists for a year now, taking them to featured with other editors, primarily with GagaNutella. It is a comprehensive topic of the outlandish singer. --FrB.TG (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- The topic covers the major subjects, but I hope you guys consider creating a "Merchandise of LG" article too to cover things like Lady Gaga Fame, Eau de Gaga, Lady Gaga x Terry Richardson, and Lady Gaga: Queen of Pop and perhaps even Haus of Gaga and Born This Way Foundation. Really big celebrities like this should have an extra article on their "non-music" part of their fame/fortune. Nergaal (talk) 15:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
-
- Delegate comment Just a reminder that topics are judged for articles that exist now, not ones that could exist in the future (that's what FTC retention is for). Whether a new article should be created or not is outside the scope of this nomination.--十八 20:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
-
- I agree with Snuggums, there is no reason to create an article about it. Gaga already has a complete body of articles here on Wiki. GagaNutellatalk 20:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, I am not agains the topic, but I would really appreciate you guys taking a step into getting the topic 100% covering all the faces of being this famous. Lots of her money is made outside of music, but I weakli support the topic in the current form. Nergaal (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Based on current articles this covers them all, they all have the expected level of quality etc. MPJ-DK 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support – Definitely meets all of the requirements; I don't see why this shouldn't be accepted. Carbrera (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC).
- Support; great set of articles here. Defiantly meets the criteria. Well done! - Yellow Dingo (talk) 04:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
-
- Thank you to everyone who supported our FTC. GagaNutellatalk 23:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Good topic nominations
1903 Atlantic hurricane season
4 articles
1903 Atlantic hurricane season |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
-
- Contributor(s): 12george1, Hurricanehink
It's been a while since I've nominated a set of articles for Good Topic. Should this nomination pass, it will be the oldest Good/Featured Topic for the project in terms of the year of the season. In addition to the three storms listed above that were notable enough to receive an article, the moisture from another cyclone in early October caused devastating floods from North Carolina to New York. Hopefully an article will be created for that flood event, but it would not necessarily have to be included in this topic. All four of the articles passed their respective Good Article nominations in May of this year or later, and thus, they should be up to standard. --12george1 (talk) 02:42, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Confirming co-nomination. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment per WP:FT? 1c "All articles or lists in the topic are linked together, preferably using a template, and share a common category or super-category." I don't see a template. 1903 Florida hurricane doesn't mention 1903 Jamaica hurricane at all. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 23:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
-
- I just created Template:1903 Atlantic hurricane season buttons--12george1 (talk) 00:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Rare Replay
32 articles
Rare Replay |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
31 articles! It's been a haul. As for the criteria, the topic is discrete: the compilation's thirty component games are each individually notable. I wasn't sure whether to include Perfect Dark (2010 video game), the Xbox remaster of the original Perfect Dark. While several of these games were remastered for the Xbox 360's high-definition output, the PD remaster is the only release with a separate article (and it was technically the version that bundled in the compilation...) Anyway, your call on that. We got through the majority of the entries late last year and I've dragged my feet on the last few until recently. Turns out that the hardest articles are the ones about which you care least. When I see this many GAs, though, I think about that many reviewers who have endured the articles as well: @AdrianGamer, Rhain, J Milburn, Ritchie333, Moisejp, Tintor2, Anarchyte, Crisco 1492, Dank, David Fuchs, Electroguv, Famous Hobo, Gabriel Yuji, Hurricanehink, Indrian, It Is Me Here, New Age Retro Hippie, Swarm, Teancum, and Tezero Thank you. czar 09:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
We finally did it! Echoing on what czar said, the majority of the lesser-known titles in this topic were in fact the most difficult to write. Just like to add that Solar Jetman was by far the most dull, tedious, and agonising thing I've ever done on here. It must have taken me longer to write that article than they did designing the game. JAGUAR 16:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support. What a monumental task. I've been following this project since day one, and I'm so glad to see it finally completed. Czar and Jaguar (and all others involved), you should be immensely proud of your work. As a reviewer of four of these articles at GAN, I'm happy to endorse this candidacy—every article is clearly within the scope of the topic, and they're all excellently researched and written. Congratulations. – Rhain ☔ 10:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support: I have reviewed quite a lot of them, and I agree that they are all excellent articles. I am sure that the rest of them are equally good and impressive. Well done! AdrianGamer (talk) 10:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support. An amazing amount of work has gone into this topic and I can see that the dedication shown by Czar and Jaguar finally paid off. They're all really well written and deserve the title of GA/FA. (Note: I didn't receive any pings, AFAIK, even though I was included in the list of people. Is this a bug?) Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
-
- You were not on the ping list? ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 13:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Salvidrim: <small>{{ping|AdrianGamer|Rhain|etc|Anarchyte|Crisco 1492|Dank|etc}}</small>. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Wow. For some unfathomable reason I thought this was posted by Sergecross73.... no idea why. I guess I need more coffee. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 13:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Salvidrim: <small>{{ping|AdrianGamer|Rhain|etc|Anarchyte|Crisco 1492|Dank|etc}}</small>. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- You were not on the ping list? ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 13:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Although I would replace Perfect Dark with Perfect Dark (the remaster), because that is the software bundled into Rare Replay, and it's a different enough game to gave a separate article and not just a mere "HD remaster". ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 13:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support; nice topic. Meets the criteria. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- I waver back and forth on this, but I think that the 2010 Perfect Dark remaster should be included alongside the original Perfect Dark, since they are both represented in the package (the core game though the included 2010 remaster). I would think that we would include the HD remasters of the other N64 games too, if they indeed warranted separate articles. Pinging in case there are any objections: @Rhain, AdrianGamer, Anarchyte, Salvidrim!, and Yellow Dingo. czar 19:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support and immense respect for the hard work that you guys have put into it. Really a great inspiration. —IB [ Poke ] 12:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support: Impressive work. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 05:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Really nice work, both in terms of quality and quantity. Though I haven't contributed myself, I've been following the progress of the Rare Replay project for most of its existence, and was particularly happy to see the older games with only little online sources available get improved.--IDVtalk 18:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Los Espantos
9 articles
Los Espantos |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Contributors: MPJ-DK
I am nominating this groups of articles for Good Topic status as I believe they hit all the marks necessary. There are nine articles in total. All are Good Articles. It covers all possible Espanto Articles that can currently be created so no gaps. They are clearly covering a similar topic and inter-connected. There is a lead article. The only challenge is that I don't have a free use image of any of Espantos. This is my first ever "Good Article" nomination and the first Lucha libre potential Good Topic as well. Any and all comments and suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance. MPJ-DK 20:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Given that they all wore the same mask, could an image similar to File:Mascara El Santo.jpg be created and used as the topic image? Just a thought........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support, seems like a fine topic. 16:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
400-series highways
18 articles
400-series highways |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
-
- Contributor(s): Floydian
This extensive topic covers the 400-series highways of Ontario, the major freeway network of the province, which includes the busiest freeway in the world as well as the first divided highway in North America. Aside from one article on a highway under construction (which lacks crucial data until it is opened), every article is a GA at a minimum, and many are A or FA. (note that Highway 412 is undergoing a GAN as it was only completed on Monday) -- Floydian τ ¢ 15:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I thought the proper procedure was to wait until it's passed GA? There is no way of knowing how long it will be before it's passed for GA and all. MPJ-DK 20:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- And a "future class"? has that been peer reviewed etc. to hit the mark for content that may not be able to get to GA/FA status yet? MPJ-DK 20:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- The GAN for Highway 412 is done and only awaiting promoted. However, I did miss the ball on sending Highway 418 for a peer review. Doing that in a minute. Unless a fellow WP:HWY member takes it on in the next 24 hours (I'll deal with any issues quickly), I'll put this nomination on hold and remove it from the queue. - Floydian τ ¢ 22:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: Ontario Highway 412 has just passed GA. --Rschen7754 03:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support, looks like a fine topic. Nergaal (talk) 16:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Russell family (Passions)
8 articles
Russell family |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
-
- Contributor(s): Aoba47
This topic covers the seven members of the Russell family, a fictional family that appeared on the American television soap opera Passions, which aired on NBC (1999–2007) and later on DirecTV (2007–08). I have been working on this a lot since the beginning of January and all eight articles have recently been passed as GAs. I would love to have this be a good topic because it would be the first one for a soap opera (as far as I am aware) and would bring more attention to this particular show. Any comments would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 03:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Driveby comment: I have removed the image that was in use on this page. Non-free images should not be used outside of the mainspace. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
-
- @Josh Milburn: Thank you for the correction! Aoba47 (talk) 19:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Star Trek: The Next Generation (season 1)
27 articles
Star Trek: The Next Generation (season 1) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
-
- Contributor(s): Miyagawa
All episodes in the season are at GA, as is the season article. Some of the episodes were my earliest GA TV episode work, and were missing the rating information because they were written before I'd tracked down a reliable source for that. But I've just gone through after the season article was promoted and made sure that they were all brought up to speed. Miyagawa (talk) 10:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support, agf. Nergaal (talk) 14:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Tremendous effort, complete and high quality, well done! Mattximus (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support - A lot of great work here! Aoba47 (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Wonderful series, and a great achievement to get so many articles to GA status. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 00:05, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Quite an accomplishment to get that quality and quantity done. Truely spectacular. MPJ-DK 20:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support; great work; topic meets WP:GT?. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 23:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Alasdair Cochrane
3 articles
Alasdair Cochrane |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
-
- Contributor(s): J Milburn
A political theorist and his two books. I know that he has plans for another book, but I can't see it appearing for a while yet, and, even when it does (due to the "speed" of academic publishing) it won't have sufficient coverage to be considered notable for a while longer. --Josh Milburn (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Support Comment -- Tks for this series of articles, Josh. Just procedurally, I think we're supposed to put a link to the nomination on the article talk pages -- seem to recall it being in the instructions anyway... Content-wise, did you consider whether Centre for Animals and Social Justice should be part of the topic given Cochrane's a founder member? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. Excellent work getting such an engaging photo of the subject! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk)!
- Thanks for the comments; I've added the talk page template. I'll have a muse on the CASJ... Josh Milburn (talk) 23:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not saying it should. I mean if the topic is the guy and his works (i.e. his notable literary output) then CASJ isn't necessary and the topic is comprehensive. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- I had a think on this; a number of people are affiliated with the centre, and other founding members include Dan Lyons and Robert Garner. The centre could probably be a topic in its own right, but if the article was going to go into a particular person's topic, it would be Lyons's. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough -- happy to support now. Pls note, I fixed a harv error in the main article but there's a few in Animal Rights Without Liberation that I'd prefer you look at -- do you know about Ucucha's checker tool? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support; I don't know about the tool, where would I find it? Josh Milburn (talk) 15:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Here you go. Once installed, it highlights things automatically -- unlike Ucucha's duplink checker/highlighter, you don't have to invoke it for a particular article. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:04, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Great, thanks, I've fixed the errors. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Here you go. Once installed, it highlights things automatically -- unlike Ucucha's duplink checker/highlighter, you don't have to invoke it for a particular article. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:04, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support; I don't know about the tool, where would I find it? Josh Milburn (talk) 15:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough -- happy to support now. Pls note, I fixed a harv error in the main article but there's a few in Animal Rights Without Liberation that I'd prefer you look at -- do you know about Ucucha's checker tool? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- I had a think on this; a number of people are affiliated with the centre, and other founding members include Dan Lyons and Robert Garner. The centre could probably be a topic in its own right, but if the article was going to go into a particular person's topic, it would be Lyons's. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not saying it should. I mean if the topic is the guy and his works (i.e. his notable literary output) then CASJ isn't necessary and the topic is comprehensive. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments; I've added the talk page template. I'll have a muse on the CASJ... Josh Milburn (talk) 23:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Topic seems fine, but the 3 articles are not liked with a template. Nergaal (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Is that necessary? The article on Cochrane is on the animal rights template, while one of the books is on another navbox; I'm not sure creating a new navbox with three articles (and three articles which all link to each other quite heavily) would be that beneficial. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Early history of video games
12 articles
Early history of video games |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
-
- Contributor(s): PresN
It's long been annoying to me that the articles on the early history of video games and the foundational games therein were in pretty awful shape, and starting this past November I decided to do something about it. 6 months, several books, countless web searches and 12 articles later, I present to you a completed good topic on the early history of video games, covering the time span from the initial protogames of 1947-51 through to the first spark of commercial video games in 1971, ending just before 1972 when Pong showed that the commercial arcade game was a real thing, and the Magnavox Odyssey showed that playing games on your TV was a possible and profitable idea. Included in this topic is every article we have on a 1971 or earlier video game, with the from-scratch early mainframe games scooping up some of the smaller ones. It's a little-known area of video game history—most books breeze past the whole 25 year period on their way to the better-documented 1972—but an important starting point for a ton of game developers in the 70s and 80s. Special thanks to Indrian, who GA reviewed all but one of these, holding my feet to the fire on being clear and precise in my language when trying to simplify complex development histories and pointing me at great resources when the easy sources contradicted each other. --PresN 03:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Once again, a topic pulled from total obscurity and shined to beautiful Green plus signs by @PresN:. Strong support for articles all of us video game readers and those interested in history should learn from. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Don't know if my GA reviews preclude me from voting, but I just wanted to take the opportunity to express my admiration for all PresN has done to turn Wikipedia into perhaps the best source for early video game history not just on the Web, but in any media format. Indrian (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Resolved comments from Nergaal (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC) |
---|
:Really nice topic but I would like to clarify the delimitation of the topic a bit since it seems a bit fuzzy.
Nergaal (talk) 04:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
|
- Included the navbox above, which helps break down the contents better than the featured topic box. As acknowledged, this "early history" as a nebulous scope and it's tough to draw scope boundaries, though I echo Indrian that PresN has done a fine job of doing so. As far as I know, we don't have a singular source that delineates the most important individual projects from this era, so I can't speak to "completeness" of the topic—for instance, is our coverage American-centric? Are we missing any major projects from the UK, Russia, or non-Western cultures? Does "early history" really span the pre-American arcade period, or what about primitive electronic games as other regions began to develop an industry? I'm comfortable with the scope as is and congratulate PresN on the accomplishment. I originally had a few of these on my list and am glad to see them finished (and which such alacrity!) I'd be happy to collaborate on cleanup for featured nominations. Support. czar 22:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
-
- @Czar: The sources are a little American-centric, though in the pre-1962 time period there would have been very little outside of America due to where the few computers were (though OXO is British) and from 1962-72 most games would still have been made in America, but primarily the sources are just missing: most video game history books start at 1972, and most of the rest just throw in a brief intro for Tennis for Two and Spacewar. Hamurabi gets an article because there's sources on it, but there's a hundred other piddly little BASIC mainframe games from that decade, from both America and Europe, that just don't have any sources whatsoever. Games that made it into the (American) 101 BASIC Games or were later on (America) BBSs are the ones with sources, sadly. 1972 (roughly) really was a tipping point everywhere, though- arcade video games became a thing in America, Europe, and Japan very quickly after Pong, microcomputers became a thing at the same time and opened up computer programming to an exponentially increasing number of people worldwide, dedicated consoles proliferated, especially in Europe... Anyways, yeah, I'd love to take these to FAC, though there's one source that I'm not sure on, and likely more books that I'd need to hunt down; if I do I'll hit you up, or if one catches your eye just let me know. --PresN 00:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
-
- I meant more that "early history" shifts between cultures. So countries that received mainframe computers after the United States might have also had an early history of video games (pre-arcade) but possibly during a different span of years, depending on whether we know about it. (This is also the main criticism of the "console generations" model Wikipedia helped to proliferate—it's based around the console war mentality and single-timeframe histories. For example, where does the British home computer timeline intersect with the Americanized console timeline.) Anyway, I think it's safe to say that these articles reflect the most prominent sources on the topic. I can help find/scan sources too—just let me know what you're thinking czar 00:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support - I think the delineation is proper, given what I came to read up on whenI worked on the Ralph Baer article last year after his death, who is credited with the Magnavox Odyssey. Both that and Pong are the first clearly-established home and arcade game, so all titles before that can easily be classified as "early video games". --MASEM (t) 16:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
RAAF area commands
9 articles
RAAF area commands |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
-
- Contributor(s): Ian Rose
This topic covers the eight geographically based commands formed by the Royal Australian Air Force during World War II. Five of the formations survived into the early 1950s, when the whole shebang was superseded by a functional command-and-control system made up of Home (operational), Training and Maintenance Commands. I've had this on the boil for a couple of years, originally planning the parent RAAF area commands to be more like a list, with subsections on the individual commands following the overview, but in the end I decided that the commands all justified their own articles and that I might put them together in a GT nom/book when complete. As the last in the series has just passed GAN, here they are... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support, but how come you dint go for a topic on RAAF Command? Nergaal (talk) 01:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Tks. This one seemed a natural, almost like a ship class topic -- I think when you take it up to the RAAF Command level, you're into a a different type of topic, no longer area commands per se, but operational command of the RAAF in the South West Pacific, and just what should belong in such a topic becomes a little more problematic, even for those relatively familiar with the subject...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support: these are all quality articles which work well together as a topic in my opinion. The only thing that leapt out at me was the self pointing redirect for No. 1 Group on Southern Area Command (RAAF). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- SUpport - Logical groupings, high quality, all related and actually a clearly defined topic. MPJ-DK 21:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support clearly defined scope, all articles are GA. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Topic removal candidates
Gwen Stefani albums
4 articles
Gwen Stefani albums |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Since the article for her most recent album, This Is What the Truth Feels Like, failed its GAN recently, I am nominating this topic for failing to meet criterion 3.b and 1.d. GamerPro64 02:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
-
- I will be working heavily on her newest album to bring it to GA–status within this week, but I've been really caught up with the GA Cup. Is there anyway you could allow me a little time to improve it? Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC).
-
- Sure. If you're able to improve and nominate it soon. If it fails its next GAN, this topic is going to be demoted. GamerPro64 02:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
-
- Comment GamerPro64, the article is being heavily worked on as we speak, so it will be up for a nomination within the week, however, I will be out of country from July 8–21, and will have limited internet access. I just thought I'd give you a heads up. Thanks!! Carbrera (talk) 22:42, 1 July 2016 (UTC).
- Demote unless the new album can become GA, though I doubt that'll happen anytime soon given how many problems I saw with it while reviewing its GAN. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for now. I see nothing wrong with waiting until the end of July when Carbrera is back editing, and will try to improve the new article. Mattximus (talk) 02:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)