"Unexplained reversion"
I had already reverted ManuelButera (talk · contribs) multiple times elsewhere and warned him about changing the Portuguese chart to a template before it was shown at the source (as Portuguese peaks do not show up at the link provided by using Template:Singlechart). You revert people all the time without providing an explanation, so for you to do it to me because I didn't provide an explanation as one of a number of reverts to one user is really hypocritical. Ss112 17:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Also, I'm pretty sure "Don't add peaks before they appear at the link destination" is easy to understand. That's exactly what you reverted me for weeks ago. The peak ManuelButera claimed was there by adding the singlechart template for Portugal is not shown at the destination (the place it links to): http://portuguesecharts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Katy+Perry&titel=Rise&cat=s Hence, you can't use it. Using the singlechart template for Portuguese peaks at all should also not be done, considering none of Portugal's song peaks appear at the pages generated by that template. I honestly am starting to think you have a grudge against me. You didn't even actually bother to check out if what ManuelButera added was right or shown at the link, but yet you revert me for an edit summary you don't understand. Let whatever you have against me go, it's getting ridiculous. Ss112 17:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Just letting you know, I've put in a request that the code for the Portuguese single chart template be changed to a year- and week-based one instead of linking to song and artist pages that do not show the peak. Edit: I know you came up with the idea for somebody to add the Portuguese single chart entry, but this shouldn't have been done on an artist- and song-oriented basis, as anybody would know from clicking on the songs on portuguesecharts.com they do not show the chart data there. Ss112 20:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Final edit: Sorry for all the additions, but I've just looked further down each page and seen that the data is contained there on the Portuguese song articles. I was thinking for a while there you had coded that Portuguese chart erroneously and under the impression that song articles contain the information I thought only the weekly chart pages did. I was under the impression that because the portuguesecharts.com pages do not show statistic data in full before the international charts are listed, as other Hung Medien sites do, that it was nowhere else on the page. I apologise for my misunderstanding, but because I didn't spot that until now, I was under the impression because you reverted me across two pages, you were carrying on a grudge Ss112 21:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Ss112: hi, its okay buddy, honest mistakes can happen. And I have told you before, I have immense respect for your edits across numerous song/album articles and the great work that you do. And no bad blood ever haha. —IB [ Poke ] 11:04, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
DYK for List of accolades received by Evita (1996 film)
![Updated DYK query.svg](https://web.archive.org/web/20160914005223im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a0/Updated_DYK_query.svg/40px-Updated_DYK_query.svg.png) |
On 21 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of accolades received by Evita (1996 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Guinness World Records listed Madonna under the category of Most Costume Changes in a Film, for wearing 85 dresses in Evita? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of accolades received by Evita (1996 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, List of accolades received by Evita (1996 film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Evita (soundtrack)
![Updated DYK query.svg](https://web.archive.org/web/20160914005223im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a0/Updated_DYK_query.svg/40px-Updated_DYK_query.svg.png) |
On 21 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Evita (soundtrack), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before recording the Evita soundtrack, Madonna trained with vocal coach Joan Lader to increase her confidence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Evita (soundtrack). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Evita (soundtrack)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Maile (talk) 12:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Taylor Swift
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Madonna's "You'll See" song page
Please forgive me if I'm not handling this situation correctly. I'm new to wikipedia editing.
My edits to the Madonna "You'll See" song page were an attempt to bring the wiki article into accordance with the source already cited. No addition citation should be needed, as I didn't introduce new information.
Key: The song is in E minor, and the cited sheet music is consistent with this.
Vocal range: The voice goes up to a high C, not a C flat, according to the cited source.
Tempo and Chord Progression: These two items are not specified in the cited source. Does this mean they should be removed from the article, rather than corrected?
Respectfully, --Ultimatefribble (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Reference
Hi, Indian!. I have a question. What do you think about this reference, it is reliable?. Chrishonduras (talk) 18:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Chrishonduras, Yahoo! is a good website for reliable source, however the author in this case, someone called "Robert of the Radish", is definitely a user generated unreliable content. —IB [ Poke ] 13:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, That's what I thought. So, actually this reference parroted figures of singles like "Underneath Your Clothes" becoming including in the list of best-selling singles or on their own articles. Thanks, Chrishonduras (talk) 00:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Electric Chapel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
The article Electric Chapel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Electric Chapel for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Cheek to Cheek
If you were reverting because of what you believed to be a formatting difference then you clearly made a very blind revert that reversed multiple other changes:
- Writing credits for "I Won't Dance" amended to include Dorothy Fields and Jimmy McHugh
- Duke Ellington credited as Edward Kennedy Ellington per liner notes
- Note that "Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered" is a live performance
- "Lady's in Love with You" does not include "The" at the beginning of the title per the back covers of Japanese and HSN editions
- Addition of Japanese CD bonus tracks that were not previously included
- Specify which countries the "international" version pertains to
- International bonus tracks are not for all "physical" versions, only the CD (the LP uses the standard track listing, also added)
- Note that one track was produced by Phil Ramone (not mentioned previously)
Also, regarding the formatting change, listing "Cheek to Cheek - x version" over and over again is ridiculously excessive. Chase (talk | contributions) 20:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
The article Electric Chapel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Electric Chapel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Congrats! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:15, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![Original Barnstar Hires.png](https://web.archive.org/web/20160914005223im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fd/Original_Barnstar_Hires.png/100px-Original_Barnstar_Hires.png) |
The Original Barnstar |
I'm awarding this to you for your contributions concerning Lady Gaga articles on Wikipedia. Go, Little Monster :) Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC) |
- Thank youuuuu. —IB [ Poke ] 14:13, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gang Bang (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
The article Gang Bang (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gang Bang (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beautiful Stranger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
The article Beautiful Stranger you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Beautiful Stranger for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Re: Perfect Illusion
Thanks for your work on this article. Sorry for removing the (empty) "sources" section on the talk page, I was just trying to clean up the different redirects/draft versions. Keep up the great work, as always! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Another Believer thanks for believing in my edits haha. And yeah I did find your removal a bit strange, or was it a perfect illusion eh? :P —IB [ Poke ] 14:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- I haven't heard the song yet, but I'll track it down. I've been looking forward to a new album. And I love watching you develop articles! --Another Believer (Talk) 14:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Aside from wonderfully developing the article, have you heard the song yet? Its audio on YouTube already has over 5m views; wow! – FrB.TG (talk) 12:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- FrB.TG yes I have and I'm not sure yet do I like it or do I hate it? I must say those opening synths have been stuck in my head all day. —IB [ Poke ] 18:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Haha me too. I'm not sure if the Mother Monster is back or not, but from the hype the song has created, it is possible that it climbs to the top of the charts (not sure though). FrB.TG (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
About a Feature list candidate
Hello IndianBio, The "Game of Thrones (season 1)" Feature List nomination was closed as it did not recive any opposes nor supports. It has been nominated again(Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Game of Thrones (season 1)/archive2). I would appreciate it if you gave a look and review it. Thanks in advance. AffeL (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
"Swine"
IB, I get the impression you don't live Artpop but do you have any thoughts about "Swine" being nominated for GA status? Any interest in co-nominating? Sorry if I've asked before, I am just looking for articles that would not be too hard to promote to GA status. --Another Believer (Talk) 14:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Another Believer:, you are correct that Gaga does not impress me that much anymore and Artpop was definitely not my favorite. But I can work on Swine after I finish some GA reviews and nominations. Lets say remind me next week and I will whip up content for it? —IB [ Poke ] 14:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- That would be so helpful! Thanks, IB. Here's hoping her next album is of more interest to you. :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
I just saw you thanked for my edit on the page above. I'm planning to rework the article in order to re-nominate is as a GA. I hope that's okay for you; if you want we could do a team nomination of that. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Cartoon network freak:, you can work with @Carbrera: for this :) —IB [ Poke ] 17:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
American Horror Story (season 6)
Would you mind not making edits with unhelpful comments like this. If you don't agree with something take it to the Talk page and we'll discuss. IF you would've done that in the first place you would've learned of my intention with the information in "Marking". After the show premiere's tomorrow and the theme revealed, obviously that whole section can be greatly reduced which I plan on doing. After. As of now, every bit of the information is tangible and as prevalent as that which comes before it. LLArrow (talk) 22:43, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
|