Contents
- 1 Merry Christmas
- 2 Joseph Heller, issue resolved
- 3 Disambiguation link notification for February 9
- 4 Bsacgeorge / British Screen Advisory Council
- 5 Talkback
- 6 Message
- 7 Duplicate articles
- 8 Edit Summaries
- 9 May 2016
- 10 Rajesh Shah
- 11 Pls consider deleting Suggestion
- 12 aloks895
- 13 Srabonti Narmin Ali
- 14 W;Wikipedia:Meetup/NCL/ArtAndFeminism 2016/Newcastle Upon Tyne City Library listed at Redirects for discussion
- 15 Hey You
Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas
and
A Happy New Year to All
Joseph Heller, issue resolved
You can at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for February 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Garrett (producer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pure (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Bsacgeorge / British Screen Advisory Council
Hi 220 of Borg,
Thank you for your reply, I *think* that I have added these statements to the British Screen Advisory Council's talk page, and to my own user page, in line with Wikipedia's policy, but if I need to do anything else, please let me know and I will so do. Thanks. Bsacgeorge (talk) 11:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC). You can at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Jayjg (talk) 22:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Message
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.
, contact the responding user(s) directly on their |
Hi, 200 of Borg. I'm glad you visited me so I want to ask you something. I'm currently creating new pages for Grimm and Gotham episodes and I would be happy if you and other people help me add information or something like that to make my pages work as I'm the only one editing them. I'm planning on creating more pages in the days to come, so please send me a message back with your answer. Thank you. Universe1609 (talk) 12:32, 26 March 2016 (PTD)
- @Universe1609: your new pages seem to 'work' fine. I am not that interested in pages like this, and I have little knowledge of those two TV shows. If you have any particular areas you need help in, just ask. 220 of Borg 08:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- @220 of Borg: Well, if you don't have knowledge, maybe you could find someone to help me in the pages. Or if not, they can contact someone else so they can help me. Please, do this favor and see if others would like to do this as I'm too shy to ask. Thanks for the advise!Universe1609 of Universe1609 01:22, 26 March 2016 (PTD)
- @Universe1609: I would suggest that Wikipedia:WikiProject Television may be the best place to ask for specialised assistance. 220 of Borg 08:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- @220 of Borg: Thank you very much. If you need help, ask me. I'll have to settle over here. Thanks for everything. Universe1609 of Universe1609 01:34, 26 March 2016 (PTD)
- @Universe1609: I would suggest that Wikipedia:WikiProject Television may be the best place to ask for specialised assistance. 220 of Borg 08:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate articles
Hi there, when you do find a duplicate article, always consider the option to redirect from one to the other, if the title is at all feasible, as at least one person thought that was the title! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Khergarh I presume? Yeh, point taken. Saves some fiddling about and deleting don't it? 220 of Borg 09:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Edit Summaries
Sorry for the late reply and I know you posted on my talk page back in 2013. I have recently learned to use the edit summaries and they are rather helpful. IceBrotherhood 17:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC) By the way is Borg a reference to Star Trek? If you click on IceBrotherhood you'll be sent to my talk page.
- IceBrotherhood, yes Star Trek. The '220' is what I was often called when I was IP editing from 2009 to 2011. Wikipedia is a 'collective', so it seemed appropriate, though thought of rather quickly. I was trying for "account created" [1] at 11:11 on November (11th month) in 2011, I was 12 minutes late. :-/ 220 of Borg 17:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
May 2016
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. WWGB (talk) 09:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Seems strange! I nominated the attack page Selim Mehajer for deletion. Seems that you were wrongly tagged as the offending editor. Looks like an admin has fixed it. Regards, WWGB (talk) 10:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed. I thought you may have had 'finger trouble' on a tablet. I did create 2 redirects, Selim Mehajer (mis-spelled) and Salim Mehajer when I moved the 'Selim' page. However, I am not credited with creating 'Selim Mehajer', though the edit history of 'Salim' does say I created it, and then moved it. I presume someone took the 'Selim' re-direct, made it an attack page and that has now been 'expunged'? (Yep, it seems so: deletion log)
- Not the first time I have been credited with 'creating' a page, when all I did was create a re-direct that another editor has then expanded. First 'negative' blaming though.
- • Mind you, about all you hear about the subject person is not entirely positive is all I can say! 220 of Borg 11:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Seems strange! I nominated the attack page Selim Mehajer for deletion. Seems that you were wrongly tagged as the offending editor. Looks like an admin has fixed it. Regards, WWGB (talk) 10:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Rajesh Shah
Hey, this article is significantly different than the version deleted at AFD. It should be sent to another AFD. Something tastes of paid advocacy, though, so I'd like to see it gone. I just can't do it under CSD. Sorry. Pilots USS Voyager out of Borg space'--v/r - TP 23:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Tom Paris(?), helps to be an Admin doesn't it? Yes, quite a few SPA's IPs opposing deletion. Borg Cube time jumps to where Voyager will be. Resolves possible COI with phaser blast. 220 of Borg 12:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Pls consider deleting Suggestion
I have been going through 'sub-pages without a page' and found User:220 of Borg/Template:Not here/doc If it's not needed can you delete it? johnmark†(talk to me) 00:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
aloks895
Hi,
220 of Borg
I have analyse our content, Please approved because there is all information related to Mangalayatan Is right. There is no any duplicacy and no any promotional content.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aloks895 (talk • contribs) 08:00, 14 June 2016
- Aloks895 I will not approve because it was WP:Unsourced and was written in an extremely un-encyclopaedic manner, as per the example I gave. Mangalayatan University is an encyclopaedia page, not an advertisement. What do you mean by 'our' content? 220 of Borg 08:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Srabonti Narmin Ali
Hello. Since Srabonti Narmin Ali is the older article, shouldn't Srabonti Narmeen Ali be redirected there? And shouldn't the AFD at Srabonti Narmin Ali be allowed to run its course? I know, WP:AGF, but this looks a lot like an attempted end-run around the AFD. Thanks, OnionRing (talk) 15:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- I also notice that the AFD on Srabonti Narmin Ali was proposed by the article's creator. Then an hour and a half later, same editor recreated it at the new spelling. OnionRing (talk) 15:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) :OnionRing I presumed that the original article name was mis-spelled, hence the newby editor then created another page under the 'correct' name? Note that both pages, and the Afd were created by the same editor. (As I now see you do know!) - 220 of Borg 15:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
W;Wikipedia:Meetup/NCL/ArtAndFeminism 2016/Newcastle Upon Tyne City Library listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect W;Wikipedia:Meetup/NCL/ArtAndFeminism 2016/Newcastle Upon Tyne City Library. Since you had some involvement with the W;Wikipedia:Meetup/NCL/ArtAndFeminism 2016/Newcastle Upon Tyne City Library redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey You
There are tons and tons of rebooted and remixed pop songs that are not cited in any books and in any pop magazines and the only way of knowing this information is by having the relevant tracks in possession. How old are you ??? Dickie birdie (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
-
-
- One example - "Love to Love You" by Donna Summer. The original single release from 1975 was completely different to the album track that is slower and twice the length without the orgasmic moaning. When Donna Summer released her Greatest Hits compilation during the 1990s most of the tracks were re-recordings because of (at that time) violation of copyright. Stll the 1975 original single version of "Love To Love You Baby" was not available on CD or MP3. That compilation album was only fit for the incinerator. It was only recently, a few years ago, that the original 1975 version of "Love To Love You Baby" was converted to and released on CD. You cannot find this information out from any published source. You can only know about it by listening first-hand to the tracks. And there are dozens and dozens of similar examples to which there are absolutely no published citations. You really are naïve to presume that such published citations exist. Dickie birdie (talk) 14:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Please acquaint yourself with information first before discussing. Dickie birdie (talk) 14:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hey you Dickie birdie, what is this about? A link to the article/edit in question would be useful The last time we had any 'conversation' was AFAIK five months ago, back in January. 220 of Borg 14:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Please acquaint yourself with information first before discussing. Dickie birdie (talk) 14:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
-