Archives (index) |
---|
November 2007 - August 2008 2007: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Threads older than 7 days may be archived by lowercase sigmabot III. |
The Signpost: 2 May 2016
- In the media: Wikipedia Zero piracy in Bangladesh; bureaucracy; chilling effects; too few cooks; translation gaps
- Traffic report: Purple
- Featured content: The best... from the past two weeks
Hitler's religious views
Hello
Sorry not sure how you do things, but I noticed you'd locked the Religious views of Hitler page. I thought I'd raise that the opening other than being grammatically wrong, is quite bias.
"The religious views of Adolf Hitler are a matter of debate, with a consensus of scholars agreeing that Hitler was not a Christian and was skeptical of religion generally."
If the views are a matter of debate there can't also be a consensus, there could be a majority of some degree but it can't be consensus if there are dissenting views.
can I suggest instead
"Adolf Hitler self identified as a catholic. However, they is a great deal of debate about the true nature of his religious.
I certainly wouldn't say he was a good christian! or that his christianity or not drove his views though the long held antisemitism of christianity was certainly an influence in the Shoah. I know in the US that there is effort among right wing christians to label Hitler an atheist and thus label all atheists as evil. I think to claim a consensus is a very strong claim to make on such a controversial issue without a source.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on the point.
Happy to discuss
Thanks
Jack — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.103.31 (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)