Archives |
---|
Contents
Saravah Soul
The subject article was PRODed by yourself - it has been restored as a contested PROD. You may wish to consider WP:AfD in the light of this result.Ronhjones (Talk) 01:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your support
Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
Cruise (film)
There's no specific rule. My point was that this isn't some new creation that nobody had looked at: it's an article that got looked over by a few people, featured on the Main Page, and viewed by a good number of people as a result. If deletion were uncontroversial, it would have been tagged sooner, so I think we ought to have the chance to discuss it instead of deleting it through PROD. Nyttend (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
PS, I'm not familiar with notability standards for films, so I have no opinion on whether it should be kept or deleted. I just want to ensure that other people, more familiar with film notability, be able to give their opinions. Nyttend (talk) 02:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
IPv6
Hey. Remember you suggested blocking the IPv6's that kept removing the AfD template from Cruise (film) and I semi'd the article instead? I just noticed a third obviously related IP has blanked the AfD itself. So I figured the person could use a break after all and worked out the range, with some effort (I hate IPv6) — seems it's 2600:1:c22b:eeae:8000::/65 — and blocked it for a week. Thought you might like to know. (My programmer son tells me a /65 IPv6 range is highly likely to be assigned to a single user.) Bishonen | talk 22:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC).
@Bishonen I see.Thanks for keeping the place clean.--Catlemur (talk) 23:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Vardar Offensive
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vardar Offensive you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Vardar Offensive
The article Vardar Offensive you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vardar Offensive for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 11:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Welcome to the shitty side of Wikipedia! The ANI thread is probably going to go against you because Wikipedia is ridiculous, so please enjoy this cookie as a condolence. Brustopher (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC) |
@Brustopher: Thanks. I got 99 problems but a cookie ain't one.--Catlemur (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)