1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 |
Contents
Vikings tv series
What do you mean not suffientally notable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.26.21 (talk) 21:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- If a good quality source about Egbert (not about the TV series) mentions the depiction, that would make it notable for inclusion in Egbert's article. There are probably hundreds of depictions of Egbert in books and on screeen over the last two hundred years. Not all of them are worth mentioning. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 16
Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)
- New donations - science, humanities, and video resources
- Using hashtags in edit summaries - a great way to track a project
- A new cite archive template, a new coordinator, plus conference and Visiting Scholar updates
- Metrics for the Wikipedia Library's last three months
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
TFA
Precious again, your Cosmic Stories and Stirring Science Stories!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Gerda! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
SF vs. sf
You reverted my effort to avoid jargon, noting that, inter alia, "some variation is necessary to avoid it sounding repetitious". I understand where you're coming from, and suggest capitalizing the abbreviation (which otherwise looks rather like a typo) as reasonable middle ground. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 18:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi -- I can see your point, but let me try defending "sf" by saying that it's the preferred abbrevation in the online science fiction encyclopedia. You won't be surprised to hear it's my own preference, but if others truly feel it's hard to read and understand even when introduced at the top of the article, I'll go along. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Anthony Anderson FA nomination
I have nominated the Anthony Anderson (basketball) article to possibly have it be promoted to a featured article. Could you please leave some comments on areas that you would want to fix so that it meets the FA criteria? If so, add your opinion on the article on the nomination page. TempleM (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not very active at the moment, and I don't think I'll have time to review it, I'm afraid. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:12, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 14, 2016
Hi Mike, I'll start work on this one today. You nominated the article at WP:FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 14:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
English Benedictine Reform
I have English Benedictine Reform at PR. Comments gratefully received. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)