This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Threads older than 3 months may be archived by MiszaBot I.
Newly added photograph
A user has added an additional image at the top of the article, File:Vagína se spermatem.jpg a closeup photograph of the article's subject. I personally tend to argue against photos of sexual acts in favor of artwork, as this has less of an association with porn. However this new addition is at least not performing an insulting mooning gesture at the viewer. One option might be to move it to where the current poor quality drawing is to replace that. I don't think the article needs both illustrations. --Simon Speed (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Convenient that the photos and illustrations are always of a woman being creampied for something that originated with gay pornography, no? Almost as though women as sexual objects is a more comfortable subject? 97.113.16.114 (talk) 07:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
I also support this picture. Please add. PizzaOven (talk) 01:21, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
No, i dont support this picture. We need additional a Photo for Example Gay Porn Creampie of a male Cream Pie Photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LadyBoySophi (talk • contribs) 13:21, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps...?
Should we add an actual human having it? Also, this article doesn't tell that this predates human history - in order for a woman to get pregnant, she has to receive an internal ejaculation from the male in the vagina in order to get pregnant. Until artificial insertion of sperm material came about, this was the only way. I would like to edit it, but it's understandingly protected. The image that was requested up a few threads would be an appropriate thing. It also puts to much weight on pornography, although it wasn't always like this. --Lesbiangirl (talk) 19:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC) EDIT: this image would be better File:Penis_Insertion_Ended.JPG --Lesbiangirl (talk) 20:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Not a problem that only affects the porn industry...
Before I begin: English is not my first language, so I might just misread something, but the following sentence reads as though only porn actors could get in trouble by having unprotected sex: "The production of pornography featuring internal ejaculations involves unprotected sex, increasing the risk of pregnancy in women and sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV." Could someone with better language and grammar skills update that part to reflect that the same is true for everyone else? --84.165.155.20 (talk) 04:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, you're right. I made the requested edit. Alsee (talk) 12:07, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Alsee, regarding this edit you made, I'm guessing that piece was limited to the pornography industry because this article is mostly about pornography. And it's mostly about pornography because the term creampie, in terms of sexuality, is used with regard to pornography far more than any other aspect of sexuality. It's not a term that is typically discussed in mainstream sexuality books; it's almost always discussed in sources as being an aspect of pornography. And experts on sexuality state that creampie, in terms of sexuality, is not mainstream among the general public; the same goes for a lot of other acts that are standard in pornography, but are not standard among society in general. Flyer22 (talk) 12:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
And like I stated with this edit, creampie, in terms of sexual activity, usually means "visible seeping or dripping of semen from the vagina or anus"; I made that clear; it should not be presented as a side definition. Flyer22 (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
I undid the change, because you can't just write what you want and put it in front of a footnote. The source is about the risk of pregnancy and STDs in pornography. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk 18:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Clarification: Malik Shabazz is referring to Alsee's aforementioned edit, and this is Malik Shabazz's edit on the matter. Flyer22 (talk) 19:21, 14 November 2014 (UTC)