WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia.
|
|
|
|
Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log
Nominations list: 397 articles (31 of them are on hold) as of 01:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC) | |
|
|
AFD/T • T-7 • T-8 • T-2 • Relisted • AFDO • WP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News, Medicine • AFD tool links • WP:DRV • WP:MFD • AIV • RFUB • UAA/CAT • RFPP • PER • CSD • AB • FAR • FAC urgents • TFAR • RSN • BLPN • FTN • GAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speech • Human rights • Journalism • Sexology and sexuality • LGBT studies • Feminism • Women • Gender Studies • Women artists • Women's History • Women scientists • Women writers • Medicine • Law • Internet • Internet culture • Comedy • U.S. Supreme Court cases
|
Contents
- 1 Two to review
- 2 The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review
- 3 Emma Stone
- 4 Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened
- 5 New two to review
- 6 The Land of Gorch
- 7 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4
- 8 Der Brænder en Ild
- 9 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4
- 10 Userfied article: Taekwondo Association of Great Britain
Two to review
I will review these two for GA candidacy:
— Cirt (talk) 03:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- GA on Hold for Spectre (2015 film). — Cirt (talk) 21:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Placed article Harmy's Despecialized Edition as GA on Hold. — Cirt (talk) 01:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review
I've listed The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Emma Stone
After making her article a GA, I have opened a peer review for a possible FAC. If you have some time, consider reviewing it, Wikipedia:Peer review/Emma Stone/archive1. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others. The scope of this case is Gamaliel's recent actions (both administrative and otherwise), especially related to the Signpost April Fools Joke. The case will also examine the conduct of other editors who are directly involved in disputes with Gamaliel. The case is strictly intended to examine user conduct and alleged policy violations and will not examine broader topic areas. The clerks have been instructed to remove evidence which does not meet these requirements. The drafters will add additional parties as required during the case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Evidence.
Please add your evidence by May 2, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. This notification is being sent to those listed on the case notification list. If you do not wish to recieve further notifications, you are welcome to opt-out on that page. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
New two to review
New two to review:
— Cirt (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
The Land of Gorch
- Note: Copy edit appears to still be ongoing by Baffle gab1978 (talk · contribs). Much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 23:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- I've finished my c/e, sorry it took longer than usual. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4
Do you have any more comments or concerns at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4. If not feel free to stop by and support/oppose based on the current state of the article and your involvement in FAC1 and FAC3 involvement.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Der Brænder en Ild
Hello friend! I hope you haven't forgotten about the GA-review. No rush, just a friendly reminder. :) Best, Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 20:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4
You were involved in one of the prior WP:FAC or WP:PR discussions about Emily Ratajkowski. The current discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive4 needs more discussants. In my prior successful FACs, success has been largely based on guidance at FAC in reshaping the content that I have nominated. I would appreciate discussants interested in giving guidance such guidance.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Userfied article: Taekwondo Association of Great Britain
Hi Cirt, I wish to either create or reinstate the article about TAGB. As you are the deleting administrator for this I would like your input on how to proceed. Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks very much. LiLT — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaylorTKD (talk • contribs) 13:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)