![]() Archives |
---|
Contents
DYK: Umaswati / Jainism
Hello, Umaswati was approved for DYK. Can you please tell me, what does that mean? Will it be featured somewhere, or a tag will be placed on the page / talk page? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 17:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Capankajsmilyo: It is in DYK-queue, will likely appear on the main page of Wikipedia on March 31 2016 at 00:00 UTC (which may be late morning in your Indian clocks). You will be notified by an wikipedia admin when it does feature on the main page. If there are other major and important high traffic wikipedia pages on Jainism, that I can help you improve, let me know. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Great, thanks. Yes there are quite a lot. One being the Jainism itself. I am trying to promote Jainism, Mahavira, Jain monasticism and Digambara to GA. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:07, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hey, Mahavira has just been promoted to GA. I got a message that I can nominate it for DYK. Can you please tell me, if it qualifies as per rules. I am not well versed with DYK yet. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Great, thanks. Yes there are quite a lot. One being the Jainism itself. I am trying to promote Jainism, Mahavira, Jain monasticism and Digambara to GA. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:07, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
-
-
-
- @Capankajsmilyo:, @जैन: Indeed, freshly promoted GA articles qualify. I see you have already nominated the article, with some minor format errors, which I will shortly fix, to help you out. Congratulations, you two, and don't forget to thank any GOCE team members who helped you with copyedits. Aren't they amazing? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch: Yes they are. -Nimit (talk) 16:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Capankajsmilyo, @जैन: I reviewed Mahavira. The article has issues which need your attention. Please see Talk:Mahavira. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:34, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch: Yes they are. -Nimit (talk) 16:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Capankajsmilyo:, @जैन: Indeed, freshly promoted GA articles qualify. I see you have already nominated the article, with some minor format errors, which I will shortly fix, to help you out. Congratulations, you two, and don't forget to thank any GOCE team members who helped you with copyedits. Aren't they amazing? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
-
-
Maitreyi GA review
Maitreyi issues which I addressed seem inadequate to the reviewer. Can you kindly have a look at them, pl? Thanks.Nvvchar. 02:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Nvvchar: I don't see new comments. Can you post a link please? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Please see reviewer's last date 4 April.--Nvvchar. 13:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
-
-
- @Nvvchar: I already took care of it. See the time stamps on 4 April. Did I miss any specific comment or section that you want me to work on? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
-
DYK for Jyotisha
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Nondualism
You've got an open {{refn|group=note|It is often ... tag and I don't know where to close it. Bgwhite (talk) 07:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Bgwhite: Oops on my part. I will fix it now. Thanks for the note. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 12:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
![]() |
You do an invaluable service to Indian culture by bringing good basic information to Wikipedia. I would like better Indian-Western relations and you advance good will by making this kind of content more accessible. Blue Rasberry (talk) 02:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC) |
- @Bluerasberry: What a lovely message. Thank you for the words of encouragement, and for the review of Natya Shastra. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 02:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Kali-Saṇṭāraṇa Upaniṣad
@Nvvchar: I suggest we withdraw the Kali-Saṇṭāraṇa Upaniṣad from GA nom, clean it up, then submit it for GOCE's help first. What do you think? Same for any other Upanishad articles whose GA review has not started. To complete the Jabala Upanishad GA review, do you know who Chandra is, since you added that summary. Please see @BlueMoonset's recent review comment. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- i have with drawn Kali-Saṇṭāraṇa Upaniṣad and two other Upanishads from the talk page of the articiles. About the author S.S.Chandra quoted in the history section of Jabala Upanishad, his full name is Dr. Soti Shivendra Chandra. He is Principal of the S.S. Post-graduate College, Shahjahanpur, Rohilkhand University. He has authored several books which have been mostly published by Atlantic Publishers and Distributors. This reference [1] gives some biographic details. I have replied on GA talk page and made a small correction in the text, only giving his full name. Pl see.--Nvvchar. 02:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
page 74 says "decapitated"
page 74 of Blackwell Companion says "decapitated"VictoriaGraysonTalk 01:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- @VictoriaGrayson: Thanks. To be continued at Talk:Shrauta. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 04:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)