Soda Lake
Sorry 'bout that undo- misclicks embarrassing me all day. -Kuro 07:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- No problemo -- 70.51.200.96 (talk) 07:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Lord John Grey
@70.51.200.96, Opera hat, and TAnthony: please review comments on the following talk page and get back to me soonest as to why somebody so significant in English history should be restyled at the whim of Wikipedia. Many thanks. L'honorable (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Black September
Please do not canvass other project pages at random in order to draw attention to a discussion or issue. This is considered bad practice on Wikipedia, and it is highly discouraged. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Oshwah: It is not at random, it is indeed the WikiProjects for the topics affected. There are two Black Septembers with articles, one of them carried out the Munich Olympics massacre in Germany. That group is a Palestinian militant group involved in Israel. The other is the event in Jordan involving Palestinians. -- 70.51.200.96 (talk) 03:50, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Oshwah: Why do you think that informing the talk pages of the articles directly involved is wrong? The primary topic change of the request at talk:Black September in Jordan directly affects page Black September and consequently Black September Organization listed therein. By removing the notices you are not informing the affected pages of the change in primary topicness directly involved with their articles. -- 70.51.200.96 (talk) 04:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Hypixel
@70.51.200.96: Please don't randomly claim "Speedy deletion" and "Advertisement" templates, just to get attention. @Jim1138: and I didn't do anything that involves "Speedy Deletion." Target360YT (talk) 04:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you wish to contest the speedy deletion, you should do it at the talk page draft talk:Hypixel. As it is the article is written in the manner of a brochure, and not an article, has no claims of notability, and no third or second party referencing, only using primary sources and original party referencing. -- 70.51.200.96 (talk) 04:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Say, what?
this was not "leaving someone a speedy deletion". It's a page full. Jim1138 (talk) 05:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Jim1138: It's the {{subst:welcomeg}} template and the speedy deletion notification tag. -- 70.51.200.96 (talk) 05:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Take a look again. Welcomes and SD notification tags are not signed by Cluebot. Jim1138 (talk) 05:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Jim1138: this is the version of the page after I edited it it [1] -- it contains the content of the subst'd {{subst:welcomeg}} and teahouse invite, and the subst'd speedy deletion notice; the vast majority of the bytes comes from {{subst:welcomeg}} -- 70.51.200.96 (talk) 05:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Take a look again. Welcomes and SD notification tags are not signed by Cluebot. Jim1138 (talk) 05:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Apology
My apology! You are correct! I must be loosing my marbles... I restored the welcome section, but left out the speedy notice per other comment. Again, my apology! Cheers Jim1138 (talk)