|
Archives |
---|
Threads older than 90 days may be archived by ClueBot III. |
The Requests for closure noticeboard is for posting requests to have an uninvolved editor assess, summarize, and formally close a discussion on Wikipedia. Formal closure by an uninvolved editor or administrator should be requested where consensus remains unclear, where the issue is a contentious one, or where there are wiki-wide implications.
Many discussions do not need formal closure and do not need to be listed here.
Many discussions result in a reasonably clear consensus, so if the consensus is clear, any editor—even one involved in the discussion—may close the discussion. The default length of a formal request for comment is 30 days (opened on or before 11 April 2016); if consensus becomes clear before that and discussion has slowed, then it may be closed early. However, editors usually wait at least a week after an RfC opens, unless the outcome is very obvious, so that there is enough time for a full discussion.
If consensus is unclear, then post a neutral request here for assistance.
Please ensure that your request for a close is brief and neutrally worded. Please include a link to the discussion. Do not use this board to continue the discussion in question. Be prepared to wait for someone to review the discussion. If you disagree with a particular closure, do not dispute it here. You can start discussion at the original page or request a Closure review at Administrators' noticeboard with a link to the discussion page and the policy-based reason you believe the closure should be overturned. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Closure review archive for previous closure reviews.
Any uninvolved editor may close most discussions, so long as they are prepared to discuss and justify their closing rationale.
Because requests for closure made here are often those that are the most contentious, closing these discussions can be a significant responsibility. Closers should be familiar with all policies and guidelines that could apply to the given discussion. All closers should be prepared to fully discuss the closure rationale with any editors who have questions about the closure or the underlying policies, and to provide advice about where to discuss any remaining concerns that those editors may have.
A request for comment discussed how to appeal closures and whether an administrator can summarily overturn a non-administrator's closure. The consensus was that closures should not be reverted solely because the closer was not an administrator. However, special considerations apply for articles for deletion and move discussions—see Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions and Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for details.
Once a discussion listed on this page has been closed, please add {{Close}} or {{Done}} and a note to the request here, after which the request will be archived.
Contents
- 1 Requests for closure
- 1.1 Requests for comment
- 1.1.1 Talk:1 metre#Request for comment
- 1.1.2 Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13 Drafts
- 1.1.3 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 21#The word "like"
- 1.1.4 Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion#RfC: Should MfD relists be allowed or disallowed?
- 1.1.5 Talk:Debbie Does Dallas#RfC: Placement of video
- 1.1.6 Talk:Johann_Sebastian_Bach#RfC:_Emphasize_benchmark_dates_in_Bach_Legacy_time_line_instead_of_using_arbitrary_century_markers_like_1800.2C_1900.2C_2000_etc.
- 1.1.7 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#RfC: Which version to go with?
- 1.1.8 Talk:Jeremy Corbyn
- 1.1.9 Talk:David Irving#RfC: Is the last suggested version regarding David Irving's position on the Holocaust acceptable to be added ("Höfle Telegram material")
- 1.1.10 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Does "died by suicide" constitute a euphemism?
- 1.1.11 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Ethnicity in infoboxes
- 1.1.12 Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach#RfC: Emphasize benchmark dates in Bach Legacy time line instead of using arbitrary century markers like 1800, 1900, 2000 etc.
- 1.1.13 Template talk:Infobox officeholder#Scottish & Welsh First Ministers infoboxes
- 1.1.14 Talk:Vyborg#Historical affiliations infobox
- 1.1.15 Talk:1st century#RfC: Should the lead say "First Century" or "1st century"?
- 1.1.16 Template talk:PBB#RfC: Should template:PBB cease operating by transulating subpage onto each article
- 1.1.17 Talk:Stack Overflow#Criticism
- 1.1.18 Talk:Maxinquaye#Recent revision to the lead
- 1.1.19 Talk:Australian head of state dispute#Merger proposal
- 1.1.20 Talk:Federal Way Public Academy#RfC: Should Federal Way Public Academy be merged to Federal Way Public Schools?
- 1.1.21 Template talk: Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016#Inclusion of popular vote
- 1.1.22 Talk:YouTube#RfC: Lists of countries using YouTube and of media encoding options
- 1.1.23 Talk:Amway#RFC: Wording of Lede Paragraph
- 1.1.24 Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1896–1954)#Move or merge proposal
- 1.1.25 Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1865–95)#Merge discussion in progress
- 1.1.26 Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity#Request for comment
- 1.1.27 Wikipedia talk:Videos#RfC: Full-length films/videos in articles
- 1.1.28 Talk:Sex offender registries in the United States#Image of the "Classification of offenders" section
- 1.1.29 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible#For articles on short passages like Psalms, which translation do we quote?
- 1.1.30 Wikipedia talk:Spoiler#RfC: Proposal to make unnecessary spoiling clearer in the guideline
- 1.1.31 Wikipedia talk:Article titles#RfC: Artist name as disambiguation regarding non-notable song titles
- 1.1.32 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Wikipedia:Disambiguation and inherently ambiguous titles
- 1.1.33 Wikipedia talk:Videos#RfC: Full-length films/videos in articles
- 1.1.34 Talk:List of people who have opened the Olympic Games#RfC: Footnote for Sydney Olympics
- 1.1.35 Talk:Chrysler#RfC: Reception; rankings in independent surveys and ratings of quality, reliability, and customer satisfaction
- 1.1.36 Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#RfC: is WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES outdated?
- 1.1.37 Talk:Pokémon Sun and Moon#Japanese Titles Added
- 1.1.38 Wikipedia:User pages/RfC for stale drafts policy restructuring and Wikipedia talk:User pages#Should old user space drafts have an expiration date?
- 1.1.39 Talk:Natalie Portman#RfC: Is the language biased?
- 1.1.40 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 127#Use of the phrase "piracy" to mean "copyright infringement"
- 1.1.41 Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016#Request for comments
- 1.1.42 Talk:Jennifer Lawrence#RfC: Which version of the lead is better?
- 1.1.43 Talk:Dr. Luke#RfC - Should section header mention sexual assault allegations?
- 1.1.44 Talk:Syed Hamid Hussain#RfC: significance of Hussain in the Bacha Khan University attack
- 1.1.45 Talk:List of living Medal of Honor recipients#RFC: Is it within Wiki policy/guidelines to include recently deceased persons in an article which lists living people?
- 1.1.46 Talk:Marlon Brando#Recent changes to Personal life section
- 1.1.47 Talk:Ted Cruz#RfC: Should the campaign section be reduced to avoid undue weight?
- 1.1.48 Talk:Amway#RFC: Wording of Lede Paragraph
- 1.1.49 Talk:My Old Kentucky Home#RfC: Rendition lists
- 1.1.50 Template talk:British colonial campaigns#Request for comment
- 1.1.51 Talk:YouTube#RfC: Lists of countries using YouTube and of media encoding options
- 1.1.52 Talk:History of South America#RfC: The immediate future of this article
- 1.1.53 Talk:Tamils#RfC: Tamils as a Stateless nation
- 1.1.54 Talk:Emmaus Nicopolis#Request for Comment
- 1.1.55 Talk:Pantomime#RfC: Is this article about pantomine or mainly British pantomime?
- 1.1.56 Talk:MDMA#RfC: How big should the "note" be after the first sentence?
- 1.1.57 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy#Is the use of the ESI Score Unencyclopedic?
- 1.1.58 Talk:Order of approximation#RfC: Should we transform this article into a dab page?
- 1.1.59 Talk:Superman#Request for comment
- 1.1.60 Talk:Al Jazeera America#RfC: Reactions to "The Dark Side: Secrets of the Sports Dopers" documentary
- 1.1.61 Talk:Domestic violence#"Domestic violence affects men, women, and children." sentence
- 1.1.62 Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état#RfC: Should Morsi's removal be called an impeachment or removal instead?
- 1.1.63 Talk:National Rifle Association#Civil Rights/Liberties Org Categorization
- 1.1.64 Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War#Rfc regarding sentence in the lede
- 1.1.65 Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War#Rfc regarding sentence in the lede#RfC: Section title
- 1.1.66 Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016#Pepper Spray Incident
- 1.1.67 Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016#RfC: Twitter controversy
- 1.1.68 Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016/Archive 2#Proposed merge with 2016 Chicago protest
- 1.1.69 Talk:Bernie Sanders#Request for comment: listing positions on particular issues in lead
- 1.1.70 Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts#RfC: Result of the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War
- 1.1.71 Talk:Yahweh#RfC: Is the focus of this article appropriate?
- 1.1.72 Talk:Christ myth theory#RfC about the length of sections on Thompson, Carrier and others
- 1.1.73 Talk:Vedas#RfC: Replace last paragraph of lead
- 1.1.74 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis#RfC: Shall we add a number column to our current Tennis Guideline #4:Career chart?
- 1.1.75 Talk:Paisley#RfC: Should this title point to the Scottish town or the fabric pattern?
- 1.1.76 Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption#RfC: Proposed expiry notice for users with an active IPBE
- 1.1.77 Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Implementing Help:Maintenance template removal
- 1.1.78 Wikipedia:Village_pump (proposals)/Archive 131#RFC: Corrections on Main Page?
- 1.1.79 Wikipedia talk:Drafts#RfC: is there a deadline for a draft?
- 1.1.80 Wikipedia talk:User pages#Should old user space drafts have an expiration date?
- 1.1.81 Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#RFC: Is a change in citation markup method a change in citation style?
- 1.1.82 Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#RfC: is WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES outdated?
- 1.1.83 Wikipedia talk:Credible claim of significance#RfC: Can SIGNIFICANCE be inherited?
- 1.1.84 Wikipedia talk:Sock puppetry#RfC: Should WP:FAMILY be deleted from WP:SOCK?
- 1.1.85 Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#RfC: How can non-web content be classed as web content?
- 1.1.86 Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion#RfC: PROD in user space
- 1.1.87 Category talk:Fair use in... images#RfC: What is the point of this category and how can its title be improved?
- 1.1.88 Template talk:Multiple issues#Request to add talksection parameter
- 1.1.89 Talk:United States presidential election, 2016#RfC: Should current and recent candidates for US President be called "politicians"?
- 1.2 Backlogs
- 1.2.1 Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Discussions awaiting closure
- 1.2.2 Wikipedia:Miscellany for discussion
- 1.2.3 Wikipedia:Requested moves
- 1.2.4 Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2016 March
- 1.2.5 Wikipedia:Files for discussion#Old discussions
- 1.2.6 Category:Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
- 1.3 XfD
- 1.4 Administrative
- 1.4.1 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive917#User:Jonadabsmith engaging in harassment?
- 1.4.2 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive916#User:Mhhossein and SaffV reported for harassment
- 1.4.3 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive920#Proposed Interaction Ban between Springee and HughD
- 1.4.4 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive920#Proposal for interaction ban with User:Winkelvi
- 1.4.5 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Standard offer for Technophant
- 1.5 Requested moves
- 1.6 General discussion
- 1.7 [[2]]
- 1.1 Requests for comment
Requests for closure
Requests for comment
Talk:1 metre#Request for comment
Would an editor please assess the consensus at this RfC at Talk:1_metre (Initiated 55 days ago on 17 March 2016)? It is not extremely contentious but there is no large support for a single action. TigraanClick here to contact me 08:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13 Drafts
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13 Drafts (Initiated 108 days ago on 24 January 2016)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 21#The word "like"
This needs an accurate analysis before a closing rationale. George Ho (talk) 07:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC) (Initiated 91 days ago on 10 February 2016)
- This is now located in an archive at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 21. Someone willing to dig into one of the lamest contentious discussions of all time should assess whether it's worth dragging out of an archive or not. ~ RobTalk 13:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Since numerous editors considered the discussion worth discussion, and since George Ho wants an accurate summary of the discussion, I agree with George Ho's request for closure. That some editors consider it "lame" does not detract from other editors' considering it important and worthy of closure (evidenced by the extensive, passionate discussion).
Because the discussion has been archived, there are two methods to implement the close: (i) Move the discussion back to the talk page and close it and (ii) Close the discussion, keeping it in the talk page archive, and announce the result on the talk page. Cunard (talk) 06:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Since numerous editors considered the discussion worth discussion, and since George Ho wants an accurate summary of the discussion, I agree with George Ho's request for closure. That some editors consider it "lame" does not detract from other editors' considering it important and worthy of closure (evidenced by the extensive, passionate discussion).
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion#RfC: Should MfD relists be allowed or disallowed?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion#RfC: Should MfD relists be allowed or disallowed? (Initiated 86 days ago on 15 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note that one of the editors in the discussion has requested admin closure, by someone who is familiar with MFD [1]. Sunrise (talk) 18:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Debbie Does Dallas#RfC: Placement of video
This RfC has been open since 14 February has seen no activity for about 10 days. Since this deals with a contentious issue that is certain to come up again, it would be helpful if this was closed by a previously uninvolved admin (or possibly more than one). before closing this RfC, it would be useful to read through the discussion below and to have a thorough understanding of how embedding files works on Wikipedia. Right Hand Drive (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Johann_Sebastian_Bach#RfC:_Emphasize_benchmark_dates_in_Bach_Legacy_time_line_instead_of_using_arbitrary_century_markers_like_1800.2C_1900.2C_2000_etc.
Really need an administrator to close this one, because this was the third RfC on the same subject in 80 days, and a lot of unorthodox behavior is involved. Softlavender (talk) 04:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images#RfC: Which version to go with?
This RfC recently expired. Would be good to get an official close on it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Jeremy Corbyn
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jeremy Corbyn#RfC: Place of birth in Infobox (initiated on 17 February 2016)? The original RfC (initiated on 13 January 2016) was closed improperly and overturned here. The subsequent RfC was bot-removed as expired on 18 March 2016. Thanks. Daicaregos (talk) 07:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Concur with Daicaregos. We need closure. GoodDay (talk) 12:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:David Irving#RfC: Is the last suggested version regarding David Irving's position on the Holocaust acceptable to be added ("Höfle Telegram material")
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David Irving#RfC: Is the last suggested version regarding David Irving's position on the Holocaust acceptable to be added ("Höfle Telegram material") (Initiated 85 days ago on 16 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Does "died by suicide" constitute a euphemism?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Does "died by suicide" constitute a euphemism? (Initiated 80 days ago on 21 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Ethnicity in infoboxes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Ethnicity in infoboxes (Initiated 70 days ago on 2 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done Closed long ago. Now at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 127#RfC: Ethnicity in infoboxes Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach#RfC: Emphasize benchmark dates in Bach Legacy time line instead of using arbitrary century markers like 1800, 1900, 2000 etc.
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach#RfC: Emphasize benchmark dates in Bach Legacy time line instead of using arbitrary century markers like 1800, 1900, 2000 etc. (Initiated 75 days ago on 26 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Template talk:Infobox officeholder#Scottish & Welsh First Ministers infoboxes
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#Scottish & Welsh First Ministers infoboxes (Initiated 79 days ago on 22 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Vyborg#Historical affiliations infobox
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vyborg#Historical affiliations infobox (Initiated 69 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:1st century#RfC: Should the lead say "First Century" or "1st century"?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:1st century#RfC: Should the lead say "First Century" or "1st century"? (Initiated 69 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done (non-admin closure) TigraanClick here to contact me 15:54, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Template talk:PBB#RfC: Should template:PBB cease operating by transulating subpage onto each article
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:PBB#RfC: Should template:PBB cease operating by transulating subpage onto each article (Initiated 69 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note to closer: Please do read the discussion section on this one. There was a compromise solution proposed and generally accepted there that isn't reflected in the numerical vote. ~ RobTalk 02:22, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done. Closed as wait till later. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Stack Overflow#Criticism
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Stack Overflow#Criticism (Initiated 75 days ago on 26 February 2016)? The opening poster wrote: "Should this be included? Can Medium be considered a reliable source in this context, regardless of what WP:RS says about blogs?" Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done formally as the dispute has been resolved by editorial process (non-admin closure). TigraanClick here to contact me 08:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Maxinquaye#Recent revision to the lead
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Maxinquaye#Recent revision to the lead (Initiated 80 days ago on 21 February 2016)? See the subsection Talk:Maxinquaye#RfC on lead. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Australian head of state dispute#Merger proposal
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Australian head of state dispute#Merger proposal (Initiated 69 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Federal Way Public Academy#RfC: Should Federal Way Public Academy be merged to Federal Way Public Schools?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Federal Way Public Academy#RfC: Should Federal Way Public Academy be merged to Federal Way Public Schools? (Initiated 73 days ago on 28 February 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Template talk: Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016#Inclusion of popular vote
We need an uninvolved admin to close the RfC on whether or not the popular vote should be included in the template. That discussion is located here. Please note that this topic has also been discussed outside of the RfC. Thanks. Prcc27🍀 (talk) 21:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: I changed the link to the discussion in @Prcc27:'s request because the section title has been changed to "Inclusion of popular vote". It's high time for an uninvolved admin to assess the situation and move to close. I hope it doesn't hurt that the discussion was not formally titled an RfC; the debate has been raging for months. — JFG talk 19:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Pleading for closure again (Initiated 60 days ago on 12 March 2016) with previous discussions dating back to (Initiated 86 days ago on 15 February 2016) for an edit war already raging earlier. This template is very visible, sitting as the infobox on one of the top 50 visited pages on Wikipedia (383,944 page views last week). A prompt closure would be most welcome during this relatively quiet period before the next voting spree next Tuesday. Thanks! — JFG talk 16:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:YouTube#RfC: Lists of countries using YouTube and of media encoding options
An uninvolved but competent editor is needed. George Ho (talk) 08:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Amway#RFC: Wording of Lede Paragraph
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Amway#RFC: Wording of Lede Paragraph (Initiated 56 days ago on 16 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1896–1954)#Move or merge proposal
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1896–1954)#Move or merge proposal (Initiated 60 days ago on 12 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1865–95)#Merge discussion in progress
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1865–95)#Merge discussion in progress (Initiated 60 days ago on 12 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity#Request for comment
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity#Request for comment (Initiated 59 days ago on 13 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done (non-admin closure) - no action needed, as the RfC was about adding a mention in a paragraph that disappeared since then. TigraanClick here to contact me 16:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Videos#RfC: Full-length films/videos in articles
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Videos#RfC: Full-length films/videos in articles (Initiated 61 days ago on 11 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Sex offender registries in the United States#Image of the "Classification of offenders" section
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Sex offender registries in the United States#Image of the "Classification of offenders" section (Initiated 56 days ago on 16 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible#For articles on short passages like Psalms, which translation do we quote?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible#For articles on short passages like Psalms, which translation do we quote? (Initiated 69 days ago on 3 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done and closed as no consensus (non-admin closure). Recommending to reopen as separate RfC since multiple questions were implicitly asked. TigraanClick here to contact me 12:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Spoiler#RfC: Proposal to make unnecessary spoiling clearer in the guideline
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Spoiler#RfC: Proposal to make unnecessary spoiling clearer in the guideline (Initiated 63 days ago on 9 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: I had asked an administrator with a history of being a good closer to close this one, since it's a complicated discussion about a guideline. The closer, I JethroBT, eventually had to decline due to a busy schedule. So I ask that the editor who eventually closes this uses a lot of care when weighing the opinions and evaluating the consensus or lack of consensus. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Article titles#RfC: Artist name as disambiguation regarding non-notable song titles
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Article titles#RfC: Artist name as disambiguation regarding non-notable song titles (Initiated 52 days ago on 20 March 2016)? Thanks, SSTflyer 04:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Wikipedia:Disambiguation and inherently ambiguous titles
Please close this RfC, which has run its course, and which I've just had to save from bot archival. RGloucester — ☎ 18:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Videos#RfC: Full-length films/videos in articles
Requesting closure on this RfC which was initiated on 11 March and hasn't seen any participation lately. I feel like I should mention something about the "validity" of the RfC since discussion sprawled a bit... So without getting into the meat of the RfC.... A couple users raised concerns about the venue -- a discussion which extended to user talk pages and VPP (this thread). Others weighing in on that matter seemed satisfied with the fact that it was (and still is) listed on centralized discussion and was advertised on VPP twice and the objecting editors were invited to move the discussion to VPP (though that didn't happen). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:List of people who have opened the Olympic Games#RfC: Footnote for Sydney Olympics
This Rfc's tag has expired (after 30 days) & so we need somebody to close it. GoodDay (talk) 16:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Chrysler#RfC: Reception; rankings in independent surveys and ratings of quality, reliability, and customer satisfaction
There's currently an edit war between the RfC participants over whether to close or extend the RfC beyond 30 days. Can a non-involved, preferably Admin, editor intervene and resolve one way or the other? At the moment it's "closed" because I have not reverted the last revert, but I expect it will get re-opened, then re-closed, again. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Formal closure by a neutral, uninvolved administrator under WP:CLOSE is respectfully requested, as neutrality is at issue, and the discussion has at times been contentious. We may expect the closing statement to be closely scrutinized. RfC launched 23 March 2016, most recent comment 1 May 2016. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 19:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#RfC: is WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES outdated?
This RfC has expired. Could a non-involved editor please give it a formal close? Cordless Larry (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Pokémon Sun and Moon#Japanese Titles Added
Requesting a formal closure to this discussion so the consensus can be enforced. czar 14:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:User pages/RfC for stale drafts policy restructuring and Wikipedia talk:User pages#Should old user space drafts have an expiration date?
Seven days since last vote. Can be closed now. --QEDK (T ☕ C) 17:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Really should wait the full 30 days on this one given how contentious this area has been recently. ~ RobTalk 20:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
The closer of Wikipedia:User pages/RfC for stale drafts policy restructuring should also close Wikipedia talk:User pages#Should old user space drafts have an expiration date? at the same time. The latter RfC is entirely concerned with questions also covered in the former (in section A3 in particular), just posed differently. Oddly enough, the two RfCs drew comments from a largely different set of editors. As such, they need to be closed together to assess full consensus and prevent contradictory results that will lead to the issue persisting as different sides cite their favored outcome. As such, I have added the latter RfC to this request. I don't envy the closer's task. A2soup (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Natalie Portman#RfC: Is the language biased?
Significant discussion also occurred prior to the RfC at Talk:Natalie Portman#Major roles, initiated April 7, 2016. RfC initiated April 8, 2016. A number of editors have commented in both sections, but recently discussion has only involved two editors disagreeing about whether there is a consensus. Both of these editors would like a closure. Sundayclose (talk) 13:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Additional discussion regarding clarification of the subject can be seen at WP:AN/I and WP:NPOV. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please note that the report at ANI was closed with an instruction to come here, and that the discussion at NPOV talk page has one opinion besides Jack Sebastian's, with no additional comments for the past two weeks. Sundayclose (talk) 20:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 127#Use of the phrase "piracy" to mean "copyright infringement"
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 127#Use of the phrase "piracy" to mean "copyright infringement" (Initiated 41 days ago on 31 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016#Request for comments
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016#Request for comments (Initiated 52 days ago on 20 March 2016)? The opening poster wrote: "In an effort to end the Wikidrama about this issue: should the sentence "Clinton's speeches to Goldman Sachs, for $675,000, have become "a campaign issue"" be added back, or is there a better way to add this referenced info?" Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Jennifer Lawrence#RfC: Which version of the lead is better?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Jennifer Lawrence#RfC: Which version of the lead is better? (Initiated 51 days ago on 21 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not done – It was a discussion, not a "formal-style" RfC, and it seems resolved. A close is redundant and unnecessary. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Dr. Luke#RfC - Should section header mention sexual assault allegations?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Dr. Luke#RfC - Should section header mention sexual assault allegations? (Initiated 51 days ago on 21 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Syed Hamid Hussain#RfC: significance of Hussain in the Bacha Khan University attack
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Syed Hamid Hussain#RfC: significance of Hussain in the Bacha Khan University attack (Initiated 46 days ago on 26 March 2016)? Please also consider the discussion at Talk:Bacha Khan University attack#Hamid Hussain. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:List of living Medal of Honor recipients#RFC: Is it within Wiki policy/guidelines to include recently deceased persons in an article which lists living people?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of living Medal of Honor recipients#RFC: Is it within Wiki policy/guidelines to include recently deceased persons in an article which lists living people? (Initiated 40 days ago on 1 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Marlon Brando#Recent changes to Personal life section
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Marlon Brando#Recent changes to Personal life section (Initiated 52 days ago on 20 March 2016)? See the subsection Talk:Marlon Brando#RfC: Should the Brando quote remain the same, and should the worldofwonder.net material be used?. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Ted Cruz#RfC: Should the campaign section be reduced to avoid undue weight?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ted Cruz#RfC: Should the campaign section be reduced to avoid undue weight? (Initiated 35 days ago on 6 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Amway#RFC: Wording of Lede Paragraph
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Amway#RFC: Wording of Lede Paragraph (Initiated 56 days ago on 16 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:My Old Kentucky Home#RfC: Rendition lists
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:My Old Kentucky Home#RfC: Rendition lists (Initiated 50 days ago on 22 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Template talk:British colonial campaigns#Request for comment
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:British colonial campaigns#Request for comment (Initiated 50 days ago on 22 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:YouTube#RfC: Lists of countries using YouTube and of media encoding options
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:YouTube#RfC: Lists of countries using YouTube and of media encoding options (Initiated 49 days ago on 23 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:History of South America#RfC: The immediate future of this article
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:History of South America#RfC: The immediate future of this article (Initiated 40 days ago on 1 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Tamils#RfC: Tamils as a Stateless nation
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Tamils#RfC: Tamils as a Stateless nation (Initiated 40 days ago on 1 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Emmaus Nicopolis#Request for Comment
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Emmaus Nicopolis#Request for Comment (Initiated 34 days ago on 7 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Pantomime#RfC: Is this article about pantomine or mainly British pantomime?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Pantomime#RfC: Is this article about pantomine or mainly British pantomime? (Initiated 18 days ago on 23 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:MDMA#RfC: How big should the "note" be after the first sentence?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:MDMA#RfC: How big should the "note" be after the first sentence? (Initiated 39 days ago on 2 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy#Is the use of the ESI Score Unencyclopedic?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy#Is the use of the ESI Score Unencyclopedic? (Initiated 38 days ago on 3 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Order of approximation#RfC: Should we transform this article into a dab page?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Order of approximation#RfC: Should we transform this article into a dab page? (Initiated 37 days ago on 4 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Superman#Request for comment
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Superman#Request for comment (Initiated 44 days ago on 28 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Al Jazeera America#RfC: Reactions to "The Dark Side: Secrets of the Sports Dopers" documentary
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Al Jazeera America#RfC: Reactions to "The Dark Side: Secrets of the Sports Dopers" documentary (Initiated 44 days ago on 28 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Domestic violence#"Domestic violence affects men, women, and children." sentence
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Domestic violence#"Domestic violence affects men, women, and children." sentence (Initiated 55 days ago on 17 March 2016)? See the subsection Talk:Domestic violence#RfC: Redundant sentence?. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état#RfC: Should Morsi's removal be called an impeachment or removal instead?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état#RfC: Should Morsi's removal be called an impeachment or removal instead? (Initiated 52 days ago on 20 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:National Rifle Association#Civil Rights/Liberties Org Categorization
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:National Rifle Association#Civil Rights/Liberties Org Categorization (Initiated 49 days ago on 23 March 2016)? The opening poster wrote: "Should the NRA article be placed into the Civil rights/liberties categories". Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War#Rfc regarding sentence in the lede
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War#Rfc regarding sentence in the lede (Initiated 41 days ago on 31 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War#Rfc regarding sentence in the lede#RfC: Section title
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War#Rfc regarding sentence in the lede#RfC: Section title (Initiated 35 days ago on 6 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016#Pepper Spray Incident
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016#Pepper Spray Incident (Initiated 42 days ago on 30 March 2016)? See the subsection Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016#RFC. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016#RfC: Twitter controversy
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016#RfC: Twitter controversy (Initiated 41 days ago on 31 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016/Archive 2#Proposed merge with 2016 Chicago protest
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016/Archive 2#Proposed merge with 2016 Chicago protest (Initiated 60 days ago on 12 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Bernie Sanders#Request for comment: listing positions on particular issues in lead
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bernie Sanders#Request for comment: listing positions on particular issues in lead (Initiated 34 days ago on 7 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts#RfC: Result of the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts#RfC: Result of the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War (Initiated 33 days ago on 8 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Yahweh#RfC: Is the focus of this article appropriate?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Yahweh#RfC: Is the focus of this article appropriate? (Initiated 22 days ago on 19 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Christ myth theory#RfC about the length of sections on Thompson, Carrier and others
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Christ myth theory#RfC about the length of sections on Thompson, Carrier and others (Initiated 40 days ago on 1 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Vedas#RfC: Replace last paragraph of lead
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vedas#RfC: Replace last paragraph of lead (Initiated 40 days ago on 1 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis#RfC: Shall we add a number column to our current Tennis Guideline #4:Career chart?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis#RfC: Shall we add a number column to our current Tennis Guideline #4:Career chart? (Initiated 35 days ago on 6 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Paisley#RfC: Should this title point to the Scottish town or the fabric pattern?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Paisley#RfC: Should this title point to the Scottish town or the fabric pattern? (Initiated 43 days ago on 29 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption#RfC: Proposed expiry notice for users with an active IPBE
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption#RfC: Proposed expiry notice for users with an active IPBE (Initiated 51 days ago on 21 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Implementing Help:Maintenance template removal
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Implementing Help:Maintenance template removal (Initiated 31 days ago on 10 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village_pump (proposals)/Archive 131#RFC: Corrections on Main Page?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village_pump (proposals)/Archive 131#RFC: Corrections on Main Page? (Initiated 49 days ago on 23 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Drafts#RfC: is there a deadline for a draft?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Drafts#RfC: is there a deadline for a draft? (Initiated 48 days ago on 24 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:User pages#Should old user space drafts have an expiration date?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:User pages#Should old user space drafts have an expiration date? (Initiated 48 days ago on 24 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#RFC: Is a change in citation markup method a change in citation style?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#RFC: Is a change in citation markup method a change in citation style? (Initiated 46 days ago on 26 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#RfC: is WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES outdated?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#RfC: is WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES outdated? (Initiated 43 days ago on 29 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Credible claim of significance#RfC: Can SIGNIFICANCE be inherited?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Credible claim of significance#RfC: Can SIGNIFICANCE be inherited? (Initiated 40 days ago on 1 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Sock puppetry#RfC: Should WP:FAMILY be deleted from WP:SOCK?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Sock puppetry#RfC: Should WP:FAMILY be deleted from WP:SOCK? (Initiated 38 days ago on 3 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#RfC: How can non-web content be classed as web content?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#RfC: How can non-web content be classed as web content? (Initiated 38 days ago on 3 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion#RfC: PROD in user space
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion#RfC: PROD in user space (Initiated 37 days ago on 4 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Category talk:Fair use in... images#RfC: What is the point of this category and how can its title be improved?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Category talk:Fair use in... images#RfC: What is the point of this category and how can its title be improved? (Initiated 53 days ago on 19 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Template talk:Multiple issues#Request to add talksection parameter
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Multiple issues#Request to add talksection parameter (Initiated 46 days ago on 26 March 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:United States presidential election, 2016#RfC: Should current and recent candidates for US President be called "politicians"?
Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United States presidential election, 2016#RfC: Should current and recent candidates for US President be called "politicians"? (Initiated 23 days ago on 18 April 2016)? While the RfC has generated responses from approximately 35 editors, constructive responses to this RfC have dwindled to only a few in the past week as other controversies concerning the US Presidential election and candidates overtake this question. However, I think the question is still relevant and ask for assessment and closure, while the answer to the question is still useful. Thanks. General Ization Talk 00:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Backlogs
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Discussions awaiting closure
This discussion forum has an extensive backlog with approximately 170 discussions that have yet to be closed, the oldest of which is from January 2016. (23:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC))
Wikipedia:Miscellany for discussion
This discussion forum has an extensive backlog with approximately 72 discussions that have yet to be closed, the oldest of which is from March 2016. (12:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC))
Wikipedia:Requested moves
What if all the admins who are willing to close RMs have already commented? A couple in the backlog are 5 weeks old tomorrow. Dicklyon (talk) 01:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2016 March
We currently have two move review discussions waiting closer since March 2016.--Cúchullain t/c 14:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Files for discussion#Old discussions
There's 100+ open discussions, some well over two months old. The vast majority of these are easy closures. Would appreciate it if an admin could spend an hour or so clearing these out. Thanks! -FASTILY 08:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
There is a large ~50 day backlog of files which have been transferred to Commons. Would appreciate it if willing admins could spend time on it. -FASTILY 08:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
XfD
Administrative
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive917#User:Jonadabsmith engaging in harassment?
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive917#User:Jonadabsmith engaging in harassment? (Initiated 68 days ago on 4 March 2016)? See the subsection Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal: Topic Ban. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive916#User:Mhhossein and SaffV reported for harassment
I'm requesting an admin to assess the consensus at this thread. Besides multiple other uncivilities by the nominator (such as when he told me that I was "tripping on acid" or "belonged in a place where I should be taken care of on hourly basis") he did not refrain from making further attacks by saying "your "just for fun reverts" appear childish to me", "...then just use a thesaurus or ask an adult" and "the English you used was childish and quite wrong". After reporting it, he surprisingly repeated his attack on the ANI page! I have explained in detail how many times he had been warned by admins to resolve his major civility issues. Thank you. (Initiated 63 days ago on 9 March 2016) Mhhossein (talk) 13:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive920#Proposed Interaction Ban between Springee and HughD
Respectfully request an uninvolved administrator please assess the proposal of uninvolved editors at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive920#Proposed Interaction Ban between Springee and HughD. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive920#Proposal for interaction ban with User:Winkelvi
Discuss seems to have reached a lull. Only comments in last few days are comments to make sure it doesn't get archived without admin action. only (talk) 21:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Standard offer for Technophant
Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Standard offer for Technophant (Initiated 27 days ago on 14 April 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Requested moves
- Talk:Joseph_P._Kennedy,_Sr.#Requested_move_6_April_2016, where an editor has specifically requested an admin of long standing and good experience in interpreting RMs. This RM is 4 weeks old, and has been at the tail of the backlog for several days already. Dicklyon (talk) 15:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- But since there don't seem to be any admins closing RM discussions, an experienced non-admin would be OK, I think. I don't see why this one is getting ignored for so long; the issue is spelled out pretty clearly, and someone just has to make a decision, so we can move on. Dicklyon (talk) 04:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
General discussion
Talk:Lafayette Welcoming Parade of 1824 (New York)
Would an admin determine if this discussion is still related to the topic and, if not, close it? LavaBaron (talk) 20:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
[[2]]
There's an RfC that I believe can be closed due to consensus (see my post in it at bottom for my summary of the RfC)...posting here as the RfC is reasonably contentious and it requires moving the name of the article...also, think a note should be placed in the TALK BOX of the article, as I explain in my summary post...if someone could take a look, see what they think...thanks..68.48.241.158 (talk) 15:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)