for good advice not to be baited by admins so they have a convenient excuse to block you. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy
For your good work at WP:DRN. Cheers! — Keithbob • Talk • 16:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar
This is for your (over) three months of diligent service as an arbitration clerk. It was an incredible honor working with you. I hope to work with you in the future- perhaps at DRN? Good luck, and happy editing! --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 22:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence
Thank you for your contribution to a successful mediation. Sunray (talk) 06:36, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your diligent effort to improve the encyclopedia. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}
Thank you for your contribution to a successful mediation. Sunray (talk) 06:36, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
| |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
|
The Original Barnstar
Truth Seeker Jimgerbig (talk) 19:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Statement
I am not a newcomer to electronic communities, having been involved in them since the mid-1980s.
One of the electronic communities in which I was active from time to time was Usenet. Wikipedia is not Usenet. Civility, including the basic principles of netiquette that were first defined in the 1980s, should be the rule in any electronic community. In Usenet, there are islands of civility in a sea of incivility. No one owns Usenet. The answer to whether anyone owns Wikipedia is a paradox. No one owns Wikipedia, but Jimbo Wales and the Board of Directors own Wikipedia.
I had originally intended to contribute a few articles on subjects of which I have knowledge. However, it seems that much of my time is being spent in responding to disputes and problematical editors. We have problematical editors on Wikipedia because editors are human and humans are problematical.
Robert McClenon 21:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Any comments posted to my talk page that are excessively long will be archived or ridiculed. Robert McClenon 01:25, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Any emails that are sent to me by Wikipedians do not have a reasonable expection of privacy, and may be archived or ridiculed. Robert McClenon 02:01, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
Articles That I Have Created
I have created the following articles. I do not own them, because no one owns a Wikipedia article. This list does not include redirects.