Pluto is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pluto is part of the Dwarf planets series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 14, 2015. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Contents
- 1 NASA Briefings/livestream (March 21 – 22, 2016) – Ceres, Mars, Pluto Results.
- 2 Shouldn't origin be under history?
- 3 The section titled 'planet x disproved' should be changed given current events
- 4 Carload of new info on Pluto's atmosphere
- 5 External links modified
- 6 Edit request: come into question
NASA Briefings/livestream (March 21 – 22, 2016) – Ceres, Mars, Pluto Results.
NASA Briefings/livestream – Experts to discuss the latest Ceres, Mars, Pluto results (near Houston, TX; March 21 – 22, 2016)[1] - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 12:34, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Followup - studies re Pluto[2][3] - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 13:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Brown, Dwayne; Cantillo, Laurie; Jeffs, William; Tygielsli, Julie (March 16, 2016). "Media Advisory M16-029 - Planetary Conference to Feature Ceres, Mars, Pluto Science Results (March 21 - 22, 2016)". NASA. Retrieved March 17, 2016.
- ^ Talbert, Tricia (March 17, 2016). "Science Papers Reveal New Aspects of Pluto and its Moons". NASA. Retrieved March 18, 2016.
- ^ Talbert, Tricia (March 17, 2016). "Top New Horizons Findings Reported in Science". NASA. Retrieved March 18, 2016.
Shouldn't origin be under history?
Why is the origin section not under the history section? --UnindentifiedHuman (talk) 07:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Because it's only half historical, and the history isn't about Pluto; it's about the Kuiper belt. Serendipodous 07:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The section titled 'planet x disproved' should be changed given current events
As it wasn't 'yet' proven, however there have been changes today.
e.g. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/planet-nine-scientists-find-more-evidence-that-hidden-planet-is-sitting-at-the-edge-of-our-solar-a6954986.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.237.212 (talk) 13:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Not the same planet. It's called "Planet Nine". Serendipodous 15:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Carload of new info on Pluto's atmosphere
Not sure how much should go in here and how much in Atmosphere of Pluto Serendipodous 12:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pluto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www2.lowell.edu/~grundy/abstracts/preprints/2013.Pluto_SpeX.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
Archived sources have been checked to be working
- http://www2.lowell.edu/~grundy/abstracts/preprints/2013.Pluto_SpeX.pdf [working, non-archival]
- https://web.archive.org/web/20151108210124/http://www2.lowell.edu/~grundy/abstracts/preprints/2013.Pluto_SpeX.pdf [working, archival]
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Edit request: come into question
Currently the lead says: "After 1992, its status as a planet fell into question". Please correct this as follows: "After 1992, its status as a planet came into question". Alternatively, "was called into question". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.102.78 (talk) 20:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Half done. That sentence could indeed be improved, but there are other ways to improve it further. For one, there is the verb "to question". Also, it issn't a status issue per se, but a scientific question about what the nature of Pluto within the Solar System (i.e. planethood). --JorisvS (talk) 09:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)