Archives |
- Archive 1, 2005-2006
- Archive 2, 2007
- Archive 3, 2008
- Archive 4, 2009
- Archive 5, 2010
- Archive 6, 2011
- Archive 7, 2012
- Archive 8, 2013
- Archive 9, 2014
- Archive 10, 2015
- Archive 11, 2016
|
|
Template:Did you know nominations/Prince Romerson
Would you mind reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Prince Romerson again?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 00:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Acknowledging your request. The indicated action (checking all online references) will be rather time consuming and I'm sorting my weekend plans now. This may not happen right away. - Brianhe (talk) 12:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Ping
This RfC may be of interest to you: Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Adding_ways_to_assess_Systemic_Bias_to_WP:N. Montanabw(talk) 20:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Seattle Wiknic 2016
DYK for Case/lang/veirs
The DYK project ( nominate) 12:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Bell Pottinger redraft
Hi Brianhe, I've had one or two discussions on the talk page of Bell Pottinger over the last year or so. The whole article is quite sprawling and there are quite a few things out of date. As I've posted on the talk page, I've prepared a shorter redraft (see here), which updates a few things and which I hope is an appropriate length and appropriately balanced. Would you mind taking a look when you have a moment? Note my COI - I work for Bell Pottinger. Many thanks. Jthomlinson1 (talk) 13:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Jthomlinson1: I have a longstanding personal policy of not assisting paid editors, thanks for asking. My position began with thinking on undisclosed paid editors but I'm applying it across the board pending more uniformity/coherence on our community policies regarding editing, disclosure, and procedures and consequences around non-compliance with ToS and guidelines. - Brianhe (talk) 22:05, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Understood, thanks. Can you think of anyone who might have a look? Jthomlinson1 (talk) 08:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- The problem is, even stopping to compose this reply is taking away from time I could be spending on other topics that are under-represented on Wikipedia, let alone the other editors who you are asking me to involve. Did you read my essay? I take WP:Systemic bias here very seriously. - Brianhe (talk) 21:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes I did – some very interesting stats and I think we all know there's clearly some way to go before Wikipedia's the sum of all human knowledge! Thanks again. Jthomlinson1 (talk) 19:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Brian, 25 DYKs is no mean feat
- Hey Victuallers! I never got my 50 DYK medal! LOL! (But seriously, I didn't...) Montanabw(talk) 20:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
|