:Beroul, very nice work on the Muslim_Brotherhood articles. --AI 10:48, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
::Many thanks! --Beroul 11:53, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
== MAB and the Muslim Botherhood ==
You seem to have done a lot of work on the Muslim_Brotherhood article. There is a dispute on the Muslim_Association_of_Britain page about whether it is a front group for the Muslim Brotherhood. If you have any information on this issule please could you contribute to the page. --JK the unwise 09:10, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
:Sorry, I don't know anything about that issue. The best suggestion I can make is to look for reputable academic sources, and be very sceptical of web sources. --Beroul 10:16, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
== Muslim Brotherhood ==
AI, I'd like to resolve our disagreement about Muslim_Brotherhood; please read my comments on that article's talk page. --Beroul 09:50, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
:Beroul, I think you have done excellent contribution to the article and it's sub articles and I apologize if I have offended you. I only disputed the article because of what I have read in the media. After re-evaluation, I have decided to disregard the media and I view their opinions as most likely just propaganda and disinformation. In the future, my involvement on the subject will be strictly from a neutral point of view and to help resolve any disputes. Aloha --AI 18:47, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
::Many thanks for your encouragement. No apology is needed; on the contrary, I've greatly appreciated your politeness throughout this discussion. I would welcome your help in resolving any future disputes. I've made a couple of other comments on Talk:Muslim_Brotherhood. --Beroul 11:53, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
== Problems with Wikipedia ==
Beroul, I do not think it is fair at all that the article on the Muslim Brotherhood can exclude any criticism, yet any articles related to my religion (Scientology) is loaded with non-academic criticism, opinions and disinformation. Please help to rewrite those articles or at least tell the POV contributors there to follow the same standard as you have set in the Muslim Brotherhood articles. Peace. --AI 20:02, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
:I'm going to have to reduce my Wikipedia work soon when the academic year starts, but I've just made a contribution to Talk:Scientology to suggest this approach. --Beroul 11:53, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
::I understand, school sessions are going to commence shortly which will also force me to spend less time contributing to Wikipedia and spend more time studying. I appreciate your suggestion at Talk:Scientology and hope the others will consider it. --AI 18:40, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
== Muslim Brotherhood articles - formatting ==
Excellent work on the Muslim_Brotherhood series of articles. I have a question though. Why are there line breaks about every fifty characters in the source text? This makes editing very difficult for me, as I have to arrow down line by line to edit pages, using a Screen_reader, as can be seen on my user page. I've just spent time removing the line breaks at History_of_the_Muslim_Brotherhood_in_Egypt_(1939-1954), but the process is tedious, and I wouldn't like to do it to all the articles. Is there a reason why you have done things this way, or is there a way of removing all the redundant line breaks? Graham 09:36, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
:Sorry about the line breaks; they're an artefact of a text editor I sometimes use. I don't know of a convenient way to remove them automatically, but I've just gone through the Muslim Brotherhood articles now, and I think I've removed all of the extra line breaks. Hope this helps. --Beroul 13:06, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
::Thanks, it is much easier to edit them now. Graham 10:47, 31 August 2005 (UTC)