Contents
Welcome back!
Yeay! :-) — Coren (talk) 19:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Coren. ViridaeDON'T PANIC 08:17, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Deck railings
Confused by your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deck railing — you've said "keep" per someone who wants to delete. Nyttend (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Warning notice to User:0oToddo0
As in the past, a warning has not stopped User:0oToddo0 (talk|contribs) from serially reverting, reinserting unsourced material and slapping tags on the article see here. In past bouts, editors have attempted to reason with 0oToddo0 on the talk page well past the point of exasperation on the same topic and behavior. • Astynax talk 18:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- And here. It seems to me he just doesn't care that he's taking the time of others to deal with his behavior. It seems he really only cares about making his point. Winkelvi (talk) 02:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Regardless, it is still not blatant vandalism and not appropriate for WP:AIV. Take it to WP:ANI if you wish. ViridaeDON'T PANIC 05:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Upon closing the incident as "stale" at WP:AN3, you asked to be notified on your talk "if he re-adds that tag again. I have warned him that a block will follow". He did, several times, and you were notified with no followup forthcoming. No response needed. Thanks. • Astynax talk 07:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Regardless, it is still not blatant vandalism and not appropriate for WP:AIV. Take it to WP:ANI if you wish. ViridaeDON'T PANIC 05:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
-
-
-
- You (Viridae) did state you would block him if he replaced the tag. That's why Astynax and I both brought your attention to his repeated tagging yesterday. He's replaced the tag and added another. I just reverted the article back to the last stable version, but I don't expect it to stay that way for long. While I suspect there is conflict of interest going on with this editor, his actions also say "article ownership" to me. Will you help? Winkelvi (talk) 14:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Viridae, FYI see Wikipedia:AN3#User:0oToddo0 reported by User:Astynax (Result: 48h). The closure mentions the warning you had left earlier. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- You (Viridae) did state you would block him if he replaced the tag. That's why Astynax and I both brought your attention to his repeated tagging yesterday. He's replaced the tag and added another. I just reverted the article back to the last stable version, but I don't expect it to stay that way for long. While I suspect there is conflict of interest going on with this editor, his actions also say "article ownership" to me. Will you help? Winkelvi (talk) 14:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
-
-
Block
Post here when you want it removed. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- thanks, can you replace it with a templated one now? ViridaeDON'T PANIC 00:31, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Tried, and now unblocked. Very strange, the templates don't seem to function, at least from my perspective. By the way, the giant Don't Panic text interferes with all buttons to the right of "edit this page", including the new section one. Might want to move it down just a smidge. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Mmm I never saw the templated block at all, mind doing that one again? That's part of what I wanted to check. I'll move the Don't panic bit down - I don't get these problems on a 24inch widescreen :P ViridaeDON'T PANIC 00:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Tried, and now unblocked. Very strange, the templates don't seem to function, at least from my perspective. By the way, the giant Don't Panic text interferes with all buttons to the right of "edit this page", including the new section one. Might want to move it down just a smidge. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Re:
Thank you for your kind notice...and for your answer :D
Telegraph article quote
Thought you might be interested to know that you were quoted in a Daily Telegraph article: http://www.webcitation.org/6IXa6hl9j --Shakehandsman (talk) 12:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Indefinite Block of Jossi
You were responsible for blocking this user in June 2009; can you point me to the CheckUser confirmation of their sockpuppetry? Thanks, DNA Ligase IV (talk) 17:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't place the block notice, so my only information on the case, which was 6 years ago, is on his talk page here: User_talk:Jossi#Documentation of sockpuppet investigation - where.27s the evidence.3F and linked within that discussion is this talk page: User_talk:Pergamino. Start with that. ViridaeDON'T PANIC 00:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- I am also unsure why an editor who joined wikipedia three months ago would be interested in a six year old sock puppetry block. ViridaeDON'T PANIC 00:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- I look up old SP blocks for fun myself. If I'm just being nosy, maybe DNA Ligase IV is as well. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 00:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3APergamino&type=block ViridaeDON'T PANIC 01:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)