Content deleted Content added
Vanished user kasjqwii3km4tkid (talk | contribs) keep - vexatious litigation |
Smashville (talk | contribs) →User talk:WLU/RFC: closing bad faith nom |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata mfd" style="background-color: #E3D2FB; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' |
|||
<!-- |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to nominate a miscellany page for deletion, you must manually edit the MfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/NAMESPACE:PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result of the discussion was '''Keep'''. Vexatious, bad faith nomination. --[[User:Smashville|'''Smashville''']][[User Talk:Smashville|<sup style="color:#03F">talk</sup>]] 01:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
====[[User talk:WLU/RFC]]==== |
====[[User talk:WLU/RFC]]==== |
||
Only recently was I made aware of the existence of this page; none of the participating users bothered to inform me. I find this page offensive and disruptive, and since WLU has declared not to start any kind of procedure based on these collected allegations, there is no reason for it to exist on Wikipedia. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User_talk:Guido_den_Broeder|talk]], [[User:Guido_den_Broeder/Visit|visit]]) 22:06, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
Only recently was I made aware of the existence of this page; none of the participating users bothered to inform me. I find this page offensive and disruptive, and since WLU has declared not to start any kind of procedure based on these collected allegations, there is no reason for it to exist on Wikipedia. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User_talk:Guido_den_Broeder|talk]], [[User:Guido_den_Broeder/Visit|visit]]) 22:06, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
Line 9: | Line 16: | ||
*:::Now '''that's''' selective quoting. You leave out the part where he says not to start a RFC. To support anything on AN/I, this page is overkill. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User_talk:Guido_den_Broeder|talk]], [[User:Guido_den_Broeder/Visit|visit]]) 00:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
*:::Now '''that's''' selective quoting. You leave out the part where he says not to start a RFC. To support anything on AN/I, this page is overkill. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User_talk:Guido_den_Broeder|talk]], [[User:Guido_den_Broeder/Visit|visit]]) 00:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Speedy Keep''' This is clearly [[vexatious litigation]] on Guido's part, and indicative of the reasons the RFC is being drafted in the first place. Still, I urge WLU to finish and formalize the RFC in due course. [[User:Skinwalker|Skinwalker]] ([[User talk:Skinwalker|talk]]) 01:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Speedy Keep''' This is clearly [[vexatious litigation]] on Guido's part, and indicative of the reasons the RFC is being drafted in the first place. Still, I urge WLU to finish and formalize the RFC in due course. [[User:Skinwalker|Skinwalker]] ([[User talk:Skinwalker|talk]]) 01:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> |