New comments, questions and concerns go on the bottom of this page. Please use the "New section" tab above if you have a new topic! if you post here I will respond here; other interested parties may want to follow the conversation, and it's rude to force them to jump back and forth. Similarly, if I post to your talk page, please respond there. Don't bother with talkback templates, I watchlist all pages as needed.
Archives: 2004–2009, 2010, January–June 2011, July–December 2011, January–June 2012, July–December 2012, January–June 2013, July–December 2013, January–June 2014, July–December 2014, January–June 2015, July–December 2015
![]() Archives |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Contents
- 1 Mission: Impossible III credits
- 2 Wisconsin Green Party
- 3 January 2016
- 4 Rams Move to LA
- 5 Sorting ring names
- 6 I could use a hand
- 7 Dagger
- 8 Disambiguation link notification for January 21
- 9 Teennage Mutant Ninja Turtles (Main Characters section)
- 10 Talk:The Undertaker
- 11 Disambiguation link notification for January 30
- 12 Athens Metro Tickets
- 13 Thank you for supporting my RfA
- 14 Orphaned non-free image File:Hershey Bears logo.gif
- 15 TNA move
- 16 Purple Line
- 17 Transit in Metropolitan Baltimore NavBox
- 18 Hello!
- 19 Whisk(e)y
- 20 Main Line (NJ Transit)
- 21 USCG
- 22 Reverts on Megabus
- 23 Wikiproject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary
- 24 UWW grappling
- 25 Anarchy
- 26 Bergen Performing Arts Center page is all factually incorrect and needs editing
- 27 Voluntary sector
- 28 Disambiguation link notification for March 15
- 29 POV Pushing
- 30 Westchester County Airport
- 31 John Williams
- 32 Thank you
- 33 Sports in Missouri
Mission: Impossible III credits
Please note that the credits I've edited were what were listed in the opening credits all the way up to Lawrence Fishburne. The credits are then repeated at the end of the film, in three sections. The first section repeats the opening credits names with their character names. The second section adds the three names as "With" and then the third section lists a whole pile of names under "And in order of appearance". If you want to retain any of the names in the third section, then you'll have to add about 30 names to the cast list. You sure you want to do that? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:05, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- If you need further proof of the credits order, the movie is currently available on the Showtime On Demand services, and also confirmed on the Extreme Blu-Ray Trilogy which also has the first two films. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- I have the DVD. That's not the issue. The issue is that speaking parts should be listed, even if just as brief text at the end of the section. oknazevad (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Well it's still 30 names that don't show much notability. See WP:CASTLIST first point about how it should only list prominent actors. But if you want those 30 actors posted, then I've thrown them in the embedded note on the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- I have the DVD. That's not the issue. The issue is that speaking parts should be listed, even if just as brief text at the end of the section. oknazevad (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Wisconsin Green Party
Your edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&curid=5137507&diff=698072017&oldid=698071945 contains what IMO is uncivil language in the edit comment and IMO has disrupted the article page for which page protection has been requested, and where a decision is awaited. I request that you revert yourself. I also suggest that you review WP:TPO. There is a possibility that an editor is making edits while logged out to avoid a direct interpretation that the editor is abusing the edit warring policy. Unscintillating (talk) 22:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't make that edit. I think you made an error. Additionally, that edit contains no edit comment at all. oknazevad (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, you said that the editor was "incompetNt" [sic]. FYI, I've made a page protection request at WP:RFPP, so I'm withdrawing my request that you self-revert. Unscintillating (talk) 00:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Again, that the wrong diff, then. As for the typo'd "incompetent", that's a specific reference to WP:COMPETENT, and not uncivil. ANI is a legitimate place to question the competency of an edit, which is what I did. oknazevad (talk) 00:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- I expect if you work on it some more you will identify who made that diff. I'm following up here because there is a further problem from this same edit, see [1] . FYI, Unscintillating (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm honestly not sure what more you want me to do here. There are certainly eyes on the issue, and the person who did make the offending redaction of others comments is being watched. As for the request for page protection, it was based on someone demanding protection because others were removing speedy deletion tags when the user was disruptively restoring them agains the correct procedure for using them. In other words, the protection request was completely inappropriate and improper, and shouldn't have been brought to RFPP in the first place. oknazevad (talk) 04:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- The request for page protection was not because of speedy deletion tags. I'm not happy that you don't take responsibility for your action, but I'm not looking for you to do anything at this point. People have worked around the two problems. I made a new request at RFPP, and here is where HW cites the same diff at ANI that I gave at the start of this section. So it is not just me telling you that there was a problem with your edit. I hope we are done here without there being any ill feelings. Regards, Unscintillating (talk) 06:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm honestly not sure what more you want me to do here. There are certainly eyes on the issue, and the person who did make the offending redaction of others comments is being watched. As for the request for page protection, it was based on someone demanding protection because others were removing speedy deletion tags when the user was disruptively restoring them agains the correct procedure for using them. In other words, the protection request was completely inappropriate and improper, and shouldn't have been brought to RFPP in the first place. oknazevad (talk) 04:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- I expect if you work on it some more you will identify who made that diff. I'm following up here because there is a further problem from this same edit, see [1] . FYI, Unscintillating (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Toronto Argonauts may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | owner = [[Larry Tanenbaum|Kilmer Sports]] and [[Bell Canada]] consortium)<ref name=pr>{{cite news|date=2015-05-20|accessdate=2015-05-20|title=Bell Canada and Kilmer Group
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Rams Move to LA
Ticketmaster has released stubs plus all other sources indicating Rams to LA Coliseum --MarcusPearl95 (talk) 07:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Also, there's this http://abc7.com/sports/la-coliseum-prepares-to-host-nfl-games-in-2016/1158491/--MarcusPearl95 (talk) 08:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- The latter doesn't actually state the deal is set. And Ticketmaster sells tickets in advance even if the event is later cancelled. At one point they actually sold tickets for a "Hamilton Predators" game when it looked like Jim Basille was going to buy and move the Nashville Predators. The other NHL owners scoffed, in part because they were offended by Basille's presumptiousness, resulting in him never getting a team. So I put no stick in a Ticketmaster page for ticket sales. Until it is confirmed by the club and stadium that everything is set, it is not official. oknazevad (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Sorting ring names
I actually agree with what you did for Sgt. Slaughter. If you see any others, go ahead and do what you feel is necessary, just let me know. Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 22:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
I could use a hand
I think I might need a character witness. RGloucester started a thread complaining about Dicklyon and myself over at AE. It was promptly hijacked by SMcCandlish with a long screed of accusations, half-truths and non-truths. I could use someone to put in a word for me. None of the admins will answer any of my questions or requests for specifics. If you're not comfortable with this, I get it. If you go over there and say you agree with any of what SmC has to say, I get it. Darkfrog24 (talk) 20:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- How did I miss this? I just noticed it now. Sadly, it's a fait accompli, which I am sorry to see. I would have, as I know that SMc's obstinate longwindedness tires out people to the point the just let him do whatever so they don't have to read his tldr stuff. Frankly, you were the one actually bringing sources and reason, while he was just dismissing anything you said with as much bloviating as possible. Frankly, it was pretty much a boomerang situation. And don't get me started on RGloucester. I am amazed that that obnoxious twit was ever let back on after some of the crap he's pulled. (When an editor goes off the rails and moves my user page because I was part of a consensus that was quite clearly against him, I think he's forever worn out his welcome with me.) oknazevad (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Dagger
Ok, so I saw the whole format part of the talk page, and the combined reigns list includes the dagger, and you were like "Ok looks good to me" and everybody is like "Use the dagger". So do we use it or no? Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plexicushion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acrylic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Teennage Mutant Ninja Turtles (Main Characters section)
I can't seem to understand. What's wrong with adding headers for the characters? I mean there are other pages on this site that adds headers for characters. Also, if you wanted it to be in alphabetical order, why can it be all the characters and not just the turtles? DonJakes(talk)
Talk:The Undertaker
I would just like to point out that it is important to remain calm and civil when dealing with matters such as disruptive edits over at The Undertaker, "written by a barely literate middle schooler" isn't exactly civil, I thought I would try to give you a heads up as this matter gets resolved as I wouldn't like to see a very active editor get in trouble. YellowStahh (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- The key words in my statement were "sounds like". It's a criticism of the writing, not the person, so it remains on this side of civil. I've been here a long time, never had any trouble staying on the right side of collaborative. oknazevad (talk) 13:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of CSX Transportation lines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Trenton Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Athens Metro Tickets
You're right, but you didn't have to remove all the section's content, so I restored it but I removed the prices. Have a nice Sunday. Dimsar01 (talk) 11:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my RfA
![]() |
Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award |
Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:Hershey Bears logo.gif
![⚠ ⚠](https://web.archive.org/web/20160415232826im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Hershey Bears logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Elisfkc (talk) 05:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
TNA move
There is nothing controversial about the move. They do not have wrestling in their name, nor are they commonly known as Total Nonstop Action Wrestling. Its a standard move which you had several days to comment on. - GalatzTalk 15:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Two days is not sufficient. That's why WP:RM is seven days. And that's why it also is used, so as to notify the appropriate projects and editors, none of which you did. In other words, you there it out there, and barely waited.
- As for the actual name, you might want to look at the logo that's actually on the page. Or the title belts. Or the website. oknazevad (talk) 15:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Purple Line
Your edits to the purple line (Norristown high speed line) are simply not true. A) It IS known as the purple line, the same way the broad street line is called the orange line, and the market-frankford line is known as the blue line. If you believe it does not belong in the title, that is fine, but it should somewhere be referenced that it is called the purple line. I live in Philadelphia and use the purple line every day, and NOBODY calls it the Norristown High Speed Line. Everyone calls it the Purple Line for use of simplicity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.247.60 (talk) 21:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sources? What you hear people call it while walking down the street is insufficient. Personally, I don't know anyone who calls them by their map color, so clearly we have a conflict of anecdotes, which is exactly why we need sources. As it stands, it using the name used in the most available sources. oknazevad (talk) 21:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Furthermore, the Purple Line does go into Philadelphia. If you knew ANYTHING about it, you would refer to its schedule. Clearly, the tracks go from Upper Darby through West Overbrook. In fact, Township Line Road station used to called West Overbrook station because it served (drumroll, please) West Overbrook! I'm aware that the station is on the Delaware County side of the line, however it is undeniable that the Purple Line serves Philadelphia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.247.60 (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop following my transportation edits and contributions. Baltimore is in need of additional transit information on Wikipedia, and my intentions are to expand the dominion of transit beyond MTA (who isn't responsible for many of the metropolitan county transit agencies). The MTA Maryland navigational box has too much information as it is, so it makes more sense to have a higher level navbox for metropolitan area transit articles. Also, your claim that WMATA does not interact with Metro Baltimore is wrong. WMATA has many commuter bus lines that travel to Anne Arundel/Howard Counties, being that both regions are interconnected. Finally, transit incorporates all forms of transportation, giving way to the term multi-modal transportation options. If you really find this box "redundant", I would suggest you open a dialog for editing the MTA Maryland NavBox, since it's poorly organized and doesn't follow a national standard.Scott218 (talk) 05:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Following you? I haven't edited that box in nearly a month! oknazevad (talk) 05:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
Hello Oknazevad. Looking through your contributions, including your most recent one, I noticed that you warn vandals manually. I used to do this myself; it eventually becomes rather tedious. Have you ever considered installing WP:TWINKLE? It makes warning vandals (as well as nominating articles for speedy deletion, reporting usernames and vandals to admins etc.) ten times easier around here. It is what may be colloquially referred to as a lifesaver. Let me know if you are unsure of how to set it up. Ches (talk) 20:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- I tried it some time back, and frankly, being I edit on my smart phone a lot, it doesn't do me very good. I have no trouble editing manually. In fact, outside of an occasional use of dabsolver or hotcat (probably totaling less than 100 edits), every single one of my 40,000+ edits has been manual. I actually take a certain amount of pride in that. oknazevad (talk) 20:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Whisk(e)y
It might have been better to try to resolve the spelling question at George Dickel where it came up first, rather than hopping over to systematically change the spelling at Maker's Mark after I mentioned that article in an edit summary. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- I was doing both simultaneously. Anyway, I checked the Maker's Mark edit history, and it did consistently spell it with the e, except where noting that the label omits it, until this anonymous edit. It was an old error that snowballed over time. Either way, it's the standard spelling when referring to bourbon and Tennessee whiskeys, so it should be retained except for brand names. oknazevad (talk) 20:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Main Line (NJ Transit)
Hello. I was just reviewing the RfC at this article. Can you please provide a status update in relation to the broader proposal you were going to make? Ncmvocalist (talk) 11:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
USCG
Re: revert. While the position of Vice Commandant has been approved for an increase to a four star rank, it has not taken effect yet. As you can see, the current Vice Commandant of the United States Coast Guard is still a Vice Admiral. While it's one thing to note the change in the law, wholesale changes to USCG and US military rank related articles may cause confusion for readers. - theWOLFchild 21:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Understood. Maybe a footnote, along the lines of "The Vice Commandant position was approved to become a 4-star position in 2015, but the current holder of the office is still a 3-star admiral as of 2016". That'd cover it, I think. oknazevad (talk) 22:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good. - theWOLFchild 22:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Reverts on Megabus
Please do not engage in edit warring. I agree that the content you removed, as written, may not be the optimal result; wholesale removal is not the answer IMO. I'm happy to work to find a consensus on what sourced content to include on Megabus (North America) and how to phrase it. Please restore the removed content and open a discussion on the talk page. --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 17:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- I was actually just applying the same standard at that article that is used on Greyhound Corporation and other transportation company articles. The items were added despite long-standing consensus to keep the items listed to fatal ones or others that have a lasting impact. Ones that just make the local news and then are forgotten about are a combination of WP:UNDUE and WP:RECENTISM. They're just not significant and don't add to the article. oknazevad (talk) 17:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikiproject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary
COASTIE I am (talk) 01:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
UWW grappling
I am sure that the sport of grappling is currently recognized by the UWW. You can check on the official website of the UWW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.13.16.218 (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, it appears they have resumed sanctioning events using amended rules that differ somewhat from their old ruleset but are still in the same general realm. I cleaned up the link a bit. As for the previous reverts, I apologize. I distinctly remember it being big news when they dropped it two and a half years ago, so that they resumed without any fanfare surprised me tremendously. Of course, had you provided a source, this would have been much easier. oknazevad (talk) 17:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Anarchy
Those tables at Anarchy that you removed were not un-sourced. They were just tabular representations of the text by them. Is there a rule against that? I really don't know. Please educate me. I was just adding material to make it easier for readers to understand the topic. Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, text is preferred to charts. I would recommend reading the manual of style to get an idea of how articles are supposed to be written. oknazevad (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. Maksim-Smelchak (talk) 13:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Bergen Performing Arts Center page is all factually incorrect and needs editing
The information on the Bergen Performing Arts Center page is all factually incorrect. The size of the theater is incorrect. The ownership is incorrect. The Garden State Plaza information is not correct. The website section doesn't have a valid website. You will not allow corrections nor will you allow the history of the theater or the mission statement of the theater or a picture of theater be placed on the page. Nor will you allow the Facebook page, the Instagram page, or correct information to be placed on the page. Attempts to copy other like-theaters with almost exact content are not allowed by you. How is this page any different: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Jersey_Performing_Arts_Center
How do you suggest the page can become factual when the edits were made to follow the NJPAC format in the example above but you said they are promotional? As of now, anyone looking at the page will get ALL factually incorrect information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.75.57.237 (talk) 13:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- If there are corrections to be made, suggest them on the talk page. As a clear case of someone affiliated with the theatre, that is the only acceptable solution, per our conflict-of-interest guideline. Also, copying the mission statement verbatim into the article is just not allowed on any level. It is not neutrally worded, and it is a copyright violation. As for the external links, we try to keep those to a minimum, so only the official link is allowed, not social media links; readers can reach those through tho official website.
- But the big problem here is not me, it's you, as we have very specific and clear procedures for editing on behalf only one's employer. Wikipedia does not exist to promote anything g, just describe. Your edits have been decidedly promotional, and are unacceptable. Please, if there are any corrections you wish to have made, mention them on the talk page. Do not make them yourself, as that is against guidelines. oknazevad (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
I made suggested corrections but the page has remained the same. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.75.57.237 (talk) 18:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Propose how it should be worded. And make sure to include sources for these (as your working there is not a proper source). Do that and it should be easily fixed. oknazevad (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Voluntary sector
It's not necessary to have a discussion before tagging. The point of tagging is to start a discussion.Rathfelder (talk) 17:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- When you tag, you should start the section yourself explaining why you think they should be merged. Otherwise it's just pointless drive-by tagging. oknazevad (talk) 17:40, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Captain N: The Game Master episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bootleg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
POV Pushing
Hack job? Please explain why you reverted all my edits at pit bull. You restored citations to dead links, and advocacy sites. What's your purpose in doing that? Jehochman Talk 01:47, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- The dead links were updated. And the supposed "advocacy sites" are pretty darn neutral. More importantly, you didn't make an effort to mark or repair the dead link (which took only a few minutes), instead just removing the information. All on an article you had no prior involvement with, one that has been contentious before and is very strongly sourced based on some of the most rigorous sourcing guidelines we have (like WP:MEDRS). I do not see the need to remove any of the material you removed, nor do I think your tag is appropriate, and a bit pointy. oknazevad (talk) 02:01, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- You don't own the article. Anybody is free to contribute. Jehochman Talk 18:18, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not the one using a WP:FRINGE blog to denigrate something that clearly passes WP:RS. And, no, you are not allowed to push a POV just because you don't like what the reliable sources say. oknazevad (talk) 20:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- You don't own the article. Anybody is free to contribute. Jehochman Talk 18:18, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Westchester County Airport
Hi, I noticed that you've undone this edit stating that it is a different kind of service. I've had a look of the airlines that operate these flights and actually you're right. Anyway, do you confirm that these are only executive flights and not usual scheduled flights? Just to change the headline. Thanks ;) Wjkxy (talk) 16:18, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, these are scheduled charters, which is a class of flights, as defined by the FAA. They are technically charter flights where the cost is split between the milultiple chartering passengers (who are preregistered clients of the company), flown at times predetermined by the operator (hence the "scheduled" in the name). They are subject to far less TSA screening of passengers (as they're pre-screened when they register), so they're popular with executives who want the lower hassle but don't want to spend the money to charter an entire flight themselves. oknazevad (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
John Williams
John Williams has not officially been confirmed to conduct and compose music for the upcoming Star Wars: Episode VIII, but I still see him on the infobox of the movie page with the Empire Online article as a reliable source. Could you please give me a better explanation about how he is really going to compose and conduct the music for the upcoming movie? AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- There's a reliable source saying that he's going to do it? Seriously, what more do you want? oknazevad (talk) 20:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- I think that you should remove him from the page until there's a better reliable source saying that he's going to do it. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you
I just wanted to thank you for clarifying that the recent edit concerning "westling" was correct instead of "wrestling" in regards to what may be the title of that championship. Not being familiar with the wrestling scene and I did not want to jump to conclusions and make a mistake.Srednuas Lenoroc (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Sports in Missouri
I just wanted to let you know that I undid one of your revisions to Sports in Missouri about Sporting KC. I copied the style found in Sports in New York about teams that represent a metro area mostly within one state put play in another. In this case Sporting also has HQ on the Missouri side so it seemed logical to list them the same way. Also there was a discussion (albeit against one user) on Talk:Major League Soccer#Sporting Kansas City Location. It seemed like a pretty simple solution to me since the majority of fan base lies within MO. Yosemiter (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- I took part in that conversation. Mollifying one edit warrior who apparently has a grudge against stating the plain fact that Sporting KC plays in KCK is no reason to misstate that SKC is located in Kansas, not Missouri. Mention it in text, but don't include it in the chart of teams in Missouri. oknazevad (talk) 17:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Then we should also remove the Giants, Jets, and Red Bulls from Sports in New York. Yosemiter (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)