1. I didn't delete your article, and I can't restore it. Administrators do those things. Complain to them if you must.
2. If you ask me politely why your page was deleted, you might get a personal answer. Otherwise, I'm just going to point you to the same policies you've already been pointed to.
3. If you are the type who move around talk pages to give undue advices to editors, stay far from my talk page until you have a core understanding of the basic Wikipedia's policy.
4. Don't even think of coming here to WP:Canvass me, I might raise a concern against you at WP:ANI
6.Sign and date your post with four tildes, as so: ~~~~
no archives yet (create)
|
Threads older than 14 days may be archived by lowercase sigmabot III. |
Contents
Regarding Autopatrolled right
Two days earlier, I had requested the Autopatrolled right and yesterday you had declined my request. I hope you have understood what I'm talking about. You said that my first article was deleted, I know it. The day when I had joined Wikipedia, I had no knowledge about Wikipedia. Before I had continued editing Wikipedia in March 2015, I had gained much knowledge about Wikipedia in February 2015, and continued editing in March 2015. You also said that a bulk of my created articles contain copyvios. OK, I'll take some of my time and remove all the possible copyvios within 3-4 days. My question to you is, what should I do to take the Autopatrolled right and when I would request the Autopatrolled right again? Regards, KunalForYou📝☎️ 04:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Wait for a minimum of six months. Thereafter, If your edit history demonstrate a good understanding of the core wikipedia's policies and guidelines, you may consider to reapply. You are just too anxious to have rights on Wikipedia. Why do you think you need the Autopatrolled user right? Any reason for your eagerness?. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 05:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- I will feel pleasure in reviewing the articles and if any article would meet Wikipedia's deletion policy, I would flag the deletion tag in that article. Regards, KunalForYou📝☎️ 06:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think you misunderstand the autopatrolled right, Kunalforyou. It is the right to post new articles that you have written without review by new page patrollers. You need to have an established track record of creating new articles with zero copyright violations, in compliance with policies and guidelines. This is essential. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Cullen, I feel they still don't even know what the tool is all about. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 13:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think you misunderstand the autopatrolled right, Kunalforyou. It is the right to post new articles that you have written without review by new page patrollers. You need to have an established track record of creating new articles with zero copyright violations, in compliance with policies and guidelines. This is essential. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- I will feel pleasure in reviewing the articles and if any article would meet Wikipedia's deletion policy, I would flag the deletion tag in that article. Regards, KunalForYou📝☎️ 06:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Page Speedy Deletion
Hi, I had created an article on Goel TMT which is one of the famous and leading brand in our State Chhattisgarh. But page has been marked for speedy deletion due to copyright issue. can you help me regarding that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goel_TMT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aadeep (talk • contribs) 16:34, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Until you make 50 constructive edits to different articles. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot!
I really appreciate, I'm very happy to contribute significantly to a better Wikipedia. BangVng (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- You are welcome! I just reviewed some of your recent edits and they seemed very good. Always use the four tides to sign your comments on talk pages. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 17:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks BangVng (talk) 17:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC) |
confused on speedy delete
I know these type articles like 2015 Kei Nishikori tennis season get speedy deleted all the time. Which version of speedy delete is the proper one? This will be like the third time it's been deleted and the same editor keeps bringing it back. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Fyunck(click), can you post some diff of where it got speedily deleted apart from deletion through prod? Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 06:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Ok I just did a generic DB version with a reason added. Perhaps that's the normal DB to use? Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- I declined your speedy deletion nomination of the article with no prejudice against its deletion through WP:AfD if notability is in doubt because A7 does not applies to articles with a claim of significance and probably this kind of articles in particular. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 05:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
G11
Hi Wikicology. Bal Rajagopalan is basically a puffed up resume and was originally written by a now-blocked editor: User:Trident13/Rajagopalan. It's obviously 100% promotional and would require a complete re-write even if the subject was notable. As such it qualifies for G11. Regards SmartSE (talk) 22:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- I respect your concerns on promotional articles but I don't see this particular one as 100% promotional. If a subject of an article is notable and its promotional contents can be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion. However, such page may be tagged with {{Peacock}} or {{Peacock inline}} template until the problem is fix (I.e rewritten). I usually don't see deletion as the only solution to address such problems. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 22:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oru Second Class Yathra
Ggentle scolding: Before you write "Subject of the article fails WP:NFILM. I can't find the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources to establish the subject notability" in a nomination, you really need to be a touch more diligent in your WP:BEFORE. I easily found multiple sources to show the topic as easily meeting WP:NF, and so decided to take a few minutes to improve the article. See edits. See used sourcing. Thanks. Schmidt, Michael Q. 14:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice Michael, you are such an amazing editor and am so proud of you. Thanks for pointing me to WP:SEP. The page was initially nominated for speedy deletion by RHaworth (talk · contribs) but I decline it and decided to take it to WP:AfD instead of fixing the problems (I feel remorseful about this). I will be more diligent in my WP:BEFORE next time. I observed something so extraordinary about you. No matter how difficult it is to find sources, you will definitely find more than enough. What is the magic? Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- A very wise decline, thank you. Proper use of an WP:A7 (which does not apply to films) requires a topic actually be researched first, as WP:UGLY is not a deletion rational and WP:NRVE tells us an article does not have to actually be sourced, as long as sources are available. The original article content "Oru Second Class Yathra is a 2015 Malayalam comedy thriller written & directed by Jexson Antony & Rejis Antony" IS a sourcable claim of notability, and an article is not to claim "this topic is notable because..." specially as WP:HANDLE instructs we fix things that are fixable and not toss them out of laziness. Having made over 100,000 edits, RHaworth should know WP:BEFORE better than anyone and you'd think he could have found and added at least one source himself. (sigh)
- For sourcing Indian films, I modify the Find sources search parameters, and also then use enquoted "modified parameters" with the search engines offered over at WP:INDAFD... and I do go past the first or second page of results. A <s>
struckthrough<s/> withdrawal is the greatest prize. Now I need to figure a decent DYK. Again, thanks. Schmidt, Michael Q. 23:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC
- DYK. Now its a matter of waiting. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Submitted my
Vajrakaya Technologies
Exactly which claim of significance is being made, because I see none, exactly zero of the "references" are anywhere close to being reliable. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)