This is GeoffreyT2000's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to GeoffreyT2000. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
|
Archives |
||
---|---|---|
|
||
Savvyjack23 (talk) 07:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Contents
- 1 Template:Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use mdy dates
- 2 Draft:2063 concern
- 3 Thanks for revert my page mudichur
- 4 Draft:Time and Date (website) concern
- 5 Your draft article, Draft:2063
- 6 Slightly confused on your recent AFD nomination
- 7 Technical move of a Current events archive
- 8 Offensive username?
- 9 Redirect categorization
- 10 Admin noticeboard request
- 11 Nomination of Bitredeconion for deletion
- 12 PROD of Gavan Duffy
- 13 Disambiguation link notification for March 10
- 14 Re: Message on my talk page
- 15 This millennium and Current millennium listed at Redirects for discussion
- 16 Current century listed at Redirects for discussion
Template:Monthly clean-up category/Messages/Use mdy dates
Please see [1]; the discussion having fizzled out, I just now closed it as no-consensus. Nyttend (talk) 00:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Draft:2063 concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2063, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for revert my page mudichur
GeoffreyT2000 thanks some body deleted content in my page and you have reverted back thanks keep watch it bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshyazz (talk • contribs) 05:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Time and Date (website) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Time and Date (website), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:2063
Hello, GeoffreyT2000. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "2063".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 15:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Slightly confused on your recent AFD nomination
How does World Youth Organization (United Kingdom) fall into any AFD if it has reliable sources from governmental websites from the United Kingdom, and media sites with the likes from IMDb, please? I think you have unfairly nominated the page for deletion. Satnder63 (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Technical move of a Current events archive
Please see my reply at WP:RMTR. There is something funny about this archive. Via Whatlinkshere I found it is linked to from Portal talk:Current events. See where it mentions 'Old talk: Current events archives'? If you go into the wikisource you will see that Archive 12 is linking to Talk:April 2005, that was later moved to Portal talk:Current events/April 2005. Is that the material that ought to be in Archive 12? If so should we just change the Archive 12 link to point to the new location? Can you look into the current status? Especially good if you can find who added the pointers to the 'Old talk' archives. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Offensive username?
I'm nonplussed by your report of RealsAreASubsetOfComplex as an offensive username. What's offensive about it? Compare also the account's only contribution here. Bishonen | talk 22:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC).
- +1 to Bishonen's concern here. It looks like you were patrolling with Twinkle or something ... you've got to remember that robotically clicking "offensive" can make you look stupid sometimes. Daniel Case (talk) 23:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Redirect categorization
Hi GeoffreyT2000! You've been interested in redirect categorization and the This is a redirect template in the past, so I wanted to let you know that there is a discussion at Template talk:This is a redirect#One parameter that might interest you. Good faith! Paine 21:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Admin noticeboard request
Hello! I have responded to your request to remove my autopatrolled rights at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Fungus Guy. Cheers! FUNgus guy (talk) 06:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Bitredeconion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bitredeconion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitredeconion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 03:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
PROD of Gavan Duffy
Hey, I removed your PROD from Gavan_Duffy_(disambiguation) after trying to clean it up so there was more than one link on the disambiguation page - since your PROD was on account of it being a one-link disambig, I figured correcting the problem would remove the need for deletion. The page now links to five different articles. I thought it'd be best for me to let you know & to explain why I did it - I dunno if there were any other issues with the page I wasn't aware of. Gimubrc (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Syndicate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Re: Message on my talk page
With regards to this message on my talk page, there is a complete misunderstanding. I did not cut and paste the article, that was someone else. There might have been a contribution on my part, but I sure as heck didn't cut & paste it at least to my memory.--Taeyebaar (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
This millennium and Current millennium listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect This millennium and Current millennium. Since you had some involvement with the This millennium and Current millennium redirects, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy(TALKCONT) 05:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Current century listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Current century. Since you had some involvement with the Current century redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy(TALKCONT) 05:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)