Contents
- 1 April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science
- 2 Cla68 block
- 3 Barnstar
- 4 Shhh! Invitation to Women in Espionage
- 5 Thanks
- 6 Jadeveon42
- 7 ANI
- 8 Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened
- 9 IDK
- 10 Photography
- 11 A Dobos torte for you!
- 12 A barnstar for you!
- 13 Thanks!
- 14 Women artists of Middle East / North Africa... a WiR & Guggenheim collaboration
- 15 You've got mail!
- 16 You've got mail
April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science
Join us! |
|
---|---|
Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon -
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Cla68 block
I'm inferring the block of Cla68 was made in your role as admin/oversight, not as a committee action. Could you verify that for me? Thanks. NE Ent 10:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- No, it was a Committee action. GorillaWarfare (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oh ... ya'll had a discussion and a vote and all that and decided to block? NE Ent 13:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes. GorillaWarfare (talk) 13:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe next time use {{ArbComBlock}} instead of {{OversightBlock}}, if for no other reason than avoiding answering stupid questions on your talk page? NE Ent 14:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes. GorillaWarfare (talk) 13:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oh ... ya'll had a discussion and a vote and all that and decided to block? NE Ent 13:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Barnstar
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For sticking up for me against that pig. God bless you. Kailey 2001 (talk) 23:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC) |
Shhh! Invitation to Women in Espionage
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Thanks
Thanks for telling me.
I had doubts about why it had been erased but its been helpfull that someone told me the exact reason why.
I appreciate it.
Whith all my respect.
Bye
Pd: i dont know if it is possible for you to help about this, but wikipedia gives to many problems when used in an ipad and in my opinion it should try to be changed.
--Danitorres64 (talk) 07:11, 13 April 2016 (UTC)danitorres64
Jadeveon42
Sock of Jadeveon41? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Seems to be. Blocked. Thanks! GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
ANI
See this.
Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others. The scope of this case is Gamaliel's recent actions (both administrative and otherwise), especially related to the Signpost April Fools Joke. The case will also examine the conduct of other editors who are directly involved in disputes with Gamaliel. The case is strictly intended to examine user conduct and alleged policy violations and will not examine broader topic areas. The clerks have been instructed to remove evidence which does not meet these requirements. The drafters will add additional parties as required during the case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Evidence.
Please add your evidence by May 2, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. This notification is being sent to those listed on the case notification list. If you do not wish to recieve further notifications, you are welcome to opt-out on that page. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
IDK
I have no idea if you even remember me at all. If you do - I'm guessing you were a bit surprised to see me sticking up for you at all. :-) — Ched : ? 03:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- You're a familiar face, in that I run into you around the wiki fairly often, but had you not brought it up I would not have gone back to try to remember what you are referring to :) Though in my searching I found your first ever post on my talk page, which was quite nice, though I have no idea what the context was. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Photography
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women in Photography
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
A Dobos torte for you!
![]() |
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ooh, fancy! Ever since seeing them make them on The Great British Bake Off I've wanted to try baking one... GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- They are deadly delicious. Enjoy! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Technical Barnstar |
everything! KgosarMyth (talk) 05:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC) |
Thanks!
Thanks for the HELP in IRC and the Page Protection --Cameron11598 (Converse) 06:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Anytime! GorillaWarfare (talk) 06:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa... a WiR & Guggenheim collaboration
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
You've got mail!
![Mail-message-new.svg](https://web.archive.org/web/20160513063407im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
You've got mail
![Mail-message-new.svg](https://web.archive.org/web/20160513063407im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:13, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- @SheriffIsInTown: I don't believe I got a message from you. Can you please resend it? You can email me via Special:EmailUser/GorillaWarfare or directly to gorillawarfarewikipedia
gmail.com; they both end up in the same place. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- I was referring to the email i sent to ARBCOM and since you are on the list, i thought i should notify you so you can check it at your earliest convenience. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ah thanks, we did receive it. Because it was sent to the -b list (because of a current case involving recused arbitrators, of which I am one), there was a bit of a delay in it being forwarded to the full committee. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- So, i did not receive any reply to that email, no confirmation that whether its being reviewed or not, so i was wondering what is the process like going forward. How long it can take for ARBCOM to review it? Or when would i get any response? Could it happen that ARBCOM might never reply? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ah thanks, we did receive it. Because it was sent to the -b list (because of a current case involving recused arbitrators, of which I am one), there was a bit of a delay in it being forwarded to the full committee. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- I was referring to the email i sent to ARBCOM and since you are on the list, i thought i should notify you so you can check it at your earliest convenience. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
@Drmies: That was sent before I sent the case to ARBCOM but I saw it afterwards so technically it does not count as a confirmation of an ARBCOM case. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- I was starting to feel slighted and sad already, Sheriff. Well, in that case GorillaWarfare, who is a much better spokesperson, will just have to respond. Take it easy, Drmies (talk) 01:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Just noting here that I've responded. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:44, 11 May 2016 (UTC)