This page is intended for reports about obvious and persistent vandals and spammers only. Before posting here, please read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit a report, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues that require administrators, file an external request for administrator attention.
Important! Please remember the following:
The edits of the reported user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
The user must have been given enough warnings to stop their disruptive behavior.
Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should go to AN/I, as a bot automatically removes accounts here that are blocked.
76.28.10.189(talk· contribs · deleted contribs ·edit filter log·WHOIS·RDNS·RBLs·http· block user ·block log) – On That's So Raven (season 3) (diff): vandalism after final warning. unresponsive IP persistently adding nonsensical (e.g. "After Raven fall, she played in Life's Funniest Moments was in "Ouch" the cat break the frame") non-notable trivia despite numerous reversions, warnings and requests to discuss. Immediately after removing this content again, it was restored, without any explanation or attempt to discuss.[1]AussieLegend (✉) 13:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Longfamily417 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) – On Draft:SageTea: account is being used only for promotional purposes. Desperately trying to promote himself and his company. I and some other AFC reviewers are fed up with repeatedly declining the same promotional article. Bradv 17:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
To be fair, this appears to be a content dispute rather than vandalism. I've checked User:Mona778's source for the contested claim and it doesn't actually say anything to support the point she's disputing so I've asked her to provide a source that does. Electoralist (talk) 22:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
You left out the noun "convention" ie biennial party conventions which is actually what that party holds. In any case, I found a copy of the party constitution online and it turns out the IP is correct and Mona is wrong, leadership reviews are held every convention, not just the one following the general election. Accusing the IP of vandalism was unwarranted. Electoralist (talk) 00:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
If they had cited their edit to reliable sources as you have, then they wouldn't have been rollbacked for sure. After all, isn't a Wikipedia policy, that every edits must be cited to reliable sources? Kind regards (Mona778 (talk) 00:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC))
HunteWinchester123 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) – vandalism after final warning. Deleting information without any explanation from Wikipedia page Maryse Ouellet, adding unnecessary images as the article has too many, re-adding irrelevant sources and unreliable ones, and changing dates.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 6:04, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
DweepSteeple (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) – On SageTea: account is being used only for promotional purposes. Sock/meatpuppet for Longfamily417 (talk· contribs), who also should be blocked. Bradv 23:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Its.more.road (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • edit filter log • block user • block log) – On Supreme (clothing): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. WannaBeEditor (talk) 23:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)