Archives |
---|
|
Contents
- 1 DYK nomination of Columbia-Southern Chemical Corporation
- 2 Redirect categorization
- 3 DYK for Columbia-Southern Chemical Corporation
- 4 Addition of direct link to Donald Drumpf RfD
- 5 Your submission at Articles for creation: Afro engineering has been accepted
- 6 Links to disambiguation pages
- 7 Speedy deletion nomination of USSC (disambiguation)
- 8 St. John's Fire District and other moves
- 9 Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aaaloco/Solitaire & Mahjong
- 10 User:Trekie9001/Duplekita listed at Redirects for discussion
- 11 ANI & WP:EVADE
- 12 Richard d'Anjolell
DYK nomination of Columbia-Southern Chemical Corporation
Hello! Your submission of Columbia-Southern Chemical Corporation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bruin2 (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Redirect categorization
Hi Godsy! You've been interested in redirect categorization and the This is a redirect template in the past, so I wanted to let you know that there is a discussion at Template talk:This is a redirect#One parameter that might interest you. Good faith! Paine 21:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Paine Ellsworth: Much appreciated. Best regards, —Godsy(TALKCONT) 22:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Pleasure! Paine
DYK for Columbia-Southern Chemical Corporation
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Addition of direct link to Donald Drumpf RfD
You do realize there was already a link to it, right? On the line,"Donald Drumpf (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)", the XfD button links to the RfD. pbp 15:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes. I figured making it a bit more pronounced wasn't a bad idea, it may have helped TheFancyFedoraWielder if it had been there before, and prevented future similar cases of confusion.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 19:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Afro engineering has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Links to disambiguation pages
Do not ever make an intentional link to a disambiguation page, as you did here. This creates false positives and disrupts the work of disambiguators. Cheers! bd2412 T 20:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- @BD2412: My apologies, I should have piped it as you did in your correction. I'm not in the habit of linking to disambiguation pages as it shouldn't be done in article prose where I edit more often. It seemed logical at the time when I noticed tour was the page name. Regards,—Godsy(TALKCONT) 20:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of USSC (disambiguation)
- See also: USSC (disambiguation) page history
A tag has been placed on USSC (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
St. John's Fire District and other moves
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
a discussion with a user about content they moved from the userspace to the mainspace | ||
---|---|---|
This move of a draft back to userspace was inappropriate [1] Getting references for this non-controversial info on a public utility service is trivially easy. Per WP:STALEDRAFT "If suitable for mainspace, move to mainspace;". Since there is nothing controversial on the page your move back to draft is close to a delete and is in violation of [2]. Legacypac (talk) 18:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Your hypocritical activity will be reviewed by Admins [3] Legacypac (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC) Godsy Disruption & GAMING the System Your gaming continues with moving a stub on a very notable novel not once but twice, conflicting me out as I was adding references. [4] See [[Claire of the Sea Light ]] for another example of your stupid behavior. Legacypac (talk) 20:51, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
|
- The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aaaloco/Solitaire & Mahjong
A tag has been placed on User:Aaaloco/Solitaire & Mahjong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 21:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Contested.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 21:32, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
User:Trekie9001/Duplekita listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User:Trekie9001/Duplekita. Since you had some involvement with the User:Trekie9001/Duplekita redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
ANI & WP:EVADE
- comment, removal 1, restoration and unsigned, and removal 2 (both removals lack edit summaries)
Howdy. You shouldn't be restoring posts there, by banned editors :) GoodDay (talk) 00:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: That's the second time that I noticed you had removed posts by a "166" IP editor from that thread. Perhaps I'm uninformed on the issue, but how do you know that is a blocked editor? My apologies if this comes off as a bit blunt. Best Regards,—Godsy(TALKCONT) 00:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Richard d'Anjolell
I have restored the deleted page to User:Kemdflp/richard d'anjolell as you requested. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you —Godsy(TALKCONT) 22:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)