Siredejoinville (talk | contribs) |
FactStraight (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
--[[User:Siredejoinville|Siredejoinville]] ([[User talk:Siredejoinville|talk]]) 15:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC) |
--[[User:Siredejoinville|Siredejoinville]] ([[User talk:Siredejoinville|talk]]) 15:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
:Regrettably, it is clear that you do not have sufficient competence in the English language to contribute text to English Wikipedia. You have tried repeatedly, and your efforts are appreciated, but much of your writing in English is incomprehensible -- even when it is obvious that you are using a translating machine. Nor may you copy and move text written in English by other authors unless that usage is allowed by applicable copyright law. Unfortunately, you can only expect to have your contributions of text reverted, not only because it would take too long to translate, but because it is often unclear what you are attempting to say and doubtful that sources can be footnoted which document the accuracy of your contribution. Thankyou for trying, but please stop and contribute in ways where your competence is better, e.g. photos, art or in French or Italian Wikipedia. [[User:FactStraight|FactStraight]] ([[User talk:FactStraight|talk]]) 00:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:15, 5 April 2016
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Succession boxes
By way of explanation, I've been removing this title from the succession boxes of the Princes of Monaco who held it for their entire lives since it's simply one of twenty-some titles held by the Grimaldi family (see Sovereign Prince of Monaco). However, I left it on Albert I, Princess Charlotte, and Rainier III since the two princes only held it for part of their lives, and Princess Charlotte was given it by Albert I, rather than simply inheriting it with a bunch of other titles. — Dan | Talk 00:37, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Isn't the title, as it is the rank of Duke, significant enough to merit inclusion? 132.205.45.148 20:37, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Edition Duke of Valentinois
Please don´t revert the editions, thi editions have verificable and true sources and references and all of them is in consonance with policy of Wikipedia. I suggset you, help to bet the article without partial sense but with true references and true references in pos from hitorical knowledge.
Thank you and be educated.
--Siredejoinville (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Regrettably, it is clear that you do not have sufficient competence in the English language to contribute text to English Wikipedia. You have tried repeatedly, and your efforts are appreciated, but much of your writing in English is incomprehensible -- even when it is obvious that you are using a translating machine. Nor may you copy and move text written in English by other authors unless that usage is allowed by applicable copyright law. Unfortunately, you can only expect to have your contributions of text reverted, not only because it would take too long to translate, but because it is often unclear what you are attempting to say and doubtful that sources can be footnoted which document the accuracy of your contribution. Thankyou for trying, but please stop and contribute in ways where your competence is better, e.g. photos, art or in French or Italian Wikipedia. FactStraight (talk) 00:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)