Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.
This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.
Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.
- Instructions for special cases
- G13. Abandoned Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates |
Files |
Possibly unfree files (PUF) |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
Archives |
---|
Threads older than 8 days may be archived. |
Contents
- 1 File:CMR Rangers assisting at an MVA scene.jpg
- 2 File:Evander Holyfield - The Real Deal.jpg
- 3 Unicity Productions, Play It Strange Trust, and Hack n' Smack Celebrity...
- 4 File:Jenifer Whisper posing in front of her Piano.jpg
- 5 Template:Dropimage
- 6 Geoffrey Spencer
- 7 Ben Polk
- 8 Anjunabeats
- 9 Facebook messages
- 10 Talk:Join Wth Us (song)
- 11 Draft:Ekhanei.com
- 12 Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America
- 13 Draft:Paint (musical group)
- 14 Draft:TEDxYouth@Columbia SC
- 15 Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (2)
- 16 Another LIfe: A Memoir of Other People
- 17 Draft:BLOM Bank
- 18 Sarah Tse
- 19 Brandon M. Schickling
- 20 Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marco Lienhard
- 21 Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (3)
- 22 Draft:HydroFLOWUSA
- 23 Draft:Onwards (The Wax Girl song)
- 24 Draft:AfroDigital
- 25 Draft:Maurice Claypole
- 26 User:Athomeeditor/sandbox (G 13 (TW))
- 27 St Luke Missionary Hospice
- 28 Colin Moriarty
- 29 Instasafe
- 30 Ravinder Kasala
- 31 File:Dollar Cravings.jpg
- 32 Werrenrath Camp
- 33 Delta Sigma Iota
- 34 Draft:Henri du Couëdic
- 35 Draft:Company of Angels
- 36 File:Jay Winik by Carl Caruso, 2015.jpg
- 37 Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (4)
- 38 Draft:Patrick Levy
- 39 Phillip A Hall III
- 40 Draft:SlipSafe
- 41 Draft:Nick Marsh (musician)
- 42 File:Soo K. Chan Profile.jpg
- 43 21:47, 8 April 2016 Sphilbrick (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Systemic operational design (G 13 (TW))
- 44 Draft:Almonte Music Scene 1990s
- 45 blockstream
- 46 founders network
- 47 File:Lucky Star Single Cover.jpg
- 48 Draft:Cassius Jay
- 49 2015–16 1. FSV Mainz 05 season
- 50 Draft:Guy Morrison (author and playwright)
- 51 Heroes in the Healing of the Nation
- 52 Broadcom (disambiguation)
- 53 'Radіo Lem.fm
File:CMR Rangers assisting at an MVA scene.jpg
- File:CMR Rangers assisting at an MVA scene.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Permission received in OTRS ticket 2016012710016437 --- Rrburke (talk) 12:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
-
- Done Please add correct OTRS template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:22, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
-
- Image now at commons:File:Ranger accident scene.JPG Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Evander Holyfield - The Real Deal.jpg
- File:Evander Holyfield - The Real Deal.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Permission confirmed in OTRS ticket 2016030410011632 --- Rrburke (talk) 20:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done It seems this is now at commons:File:TheRealDeal.jpg after I restored it here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Unicity Productions, Play It Strange Trust, and Hack n' Smack Celebrity...
- Unicity Productions · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] (User:APBAnimals/Unicity Productions)
- Play It Strange Trust · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] (User:Strangewiki/Play It Strange Trust)
- Hack n' Smack Celebrity Golf Classic in Memory of Kerry Daveline · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] (User:Kerry's girls/Hack n' Smack Celebrity Golf Classic in Memory of Kerry Daveline)
The pages were moved to the mainspace from the userspace by a user other than that of the user whose userspace in which they resided (the same user for all three pages). This should not be done unless a page is suitable for the mainspace. They were deleted under non-general speedy deletion criteria which wouldn't apply to the user namespace. The administrators (three different administrators) didn't err in applying the speedy deletion criterion, the circumstances surrounding the page being in that location is the problem. The content should be restored to the userspace. If this is a matter that would need to be raised at WP:DRV, please let me know, and I'll consider doing so. Best Regards, -—Godsy(TALKCONT) 06:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Godsy: Done. I agree that moving other users' userspace drafts to the mainspace in order to get them deleted is not a proper thing to do. @Legacypac: don't do it again. I have marked them all with {{Inactive userpage blanked}} which is a much better way to deal with these pages - needs no admin action, doesn't clog up MfD with endless repetitions of the same arguments, and is more user-friendly in the not impossible case that the user returns one day. Courtesy ping to the three deleting admins Shirt58, RHaworth, Ritchie333 to let them know what I have done. JohnCD (talk) 11:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Supplementary comment: I do not say that it is always wrong to move someone else's abandoned userspace draft to the mainspace. If it is really ready for it, that can be useful and result in an article (e.g. User:Ajantala007/Akata Formation); but I think that a third party who does that should take responsibility for the page and, if it does not survive in mainspace, should arrange for it to be returned to the user space, rather than let it be deleted for reasons which would not apply in user space. JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Objection I did not move these to have them deleted. I was not aware that two of them were deleted and expressed surprise about the Hack & Smack one already which I found to be a notable annual charity event. I moved them because I thought they were good stubs. Godsy is a not assuming good faith, spouting lies and is a hypercrite who themselves has been moving good stubs back into userspace [1] This disruptive behavior is why I started an ANi thread. Legacypac (talk) 15:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- If you actually read my comment above, I never claimed you "move[d] these to have them deleted" in this case (though you explicitly did so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard d'Anjolell and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graffiki), rather that the moves were improper because they were weren't ready to reside in the mainspace and were subsequently deleted under criteria that wouldn't apply to the user namespace. If you "thought they were good stubs", why do you have a problem with their restoration?—Godsy(TALKCONT) 20:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- @Legacypac: I do not see how you could possibly think that either this or this was anything but a candidate for immediate speedy deletion by WP:CSD#A7 "no indication of importance"; and indeed both were so deleted within hours. I have made a proposal to cover this sort of move to mainspace at WT:UP#Moving abandoned userspace drafts to mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 16:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Jenifer Whisper posing in front of her Piano.jpg
- File:Jenifer Whisper posing in front of her Piano.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Permission confirmed in OTRS ticket 2016031510003433 --- Rrburke (talk) 02:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Rrburke: OK, the deleted file has a claim by the uploader "was sent to me personally" and then we get a permission email from a yahoo address that anyone could have created. Assuming good faith is fine and all, but when it comes to copyrights we have to exercise some additional vigilance. I searched OTRS for any separate correspondence that may provide evidence of identity and I could find none. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Amatulic: You're right: that was premature. Often for personal pics of noteworthy people we get nothing but a gmail or yahoo address, because that's all the uploader has; I presumed that was the case here, but I should have inquired more closely. This is the disadvantage of not being able to look at deleted images. I'll ask the uploader to resend permission from another address. Incidentally, does WP:AGF apply to OTRS? -- I find I often WP:ABF. -- Rrburke (talk) 12:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Rrburke: Here and there you will come across an OTRS ticket involving a copyright holder claiming they never gave consent, yet the photo has a valid license. I have handled one such situation myself. I was able to convince the photographer to allow us to keep the photo as long as we re-titled the file and attributed it properly. We want to minimize those situations. OTRS volunteers perform a critical function in protecting the Wikimedia Foundation from legal liability, and we can only do that through exercising due diligence in verifying claims of ownership. In some cases I have accepted a yahoo address if that address appears on a website clearly operated by the copyright holder. In other cases I have asked the person to create a temporary page on a website known to be under the copyright-holder's control. Once I have had to ask for a scanned copy of valid identification. This has nothing to do with assuming good faith or bad faith. Simply put, it isn't the prerogative of OTRS volunteers to take chances with possibly exposing the WMF to legal liability. So unpleasant as it is sometimes, we have to make correspondents jump through some hoops. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Amatulic: You're right: that was premature. Often for personal pics of noteworthy people we get nothing but a gmail or yahoo address, because that's all the uploader has; I presumed that was the case here, but I should have inquired more closely. This is the disadvantage of not being able to look at deleted images. I'll ask the uploader to resend permission from another address. Incidentally, does WP:AGF apply to OTRS? -- I find I often WP:ABF. -- Rrburke (talk) 12:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Template:Dropimage
- Template:Dropimage · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I wrote this template a few years ago and while it didn't see use in article-space it seems it had some pretty nifty functionality that I wanted to recreate for other templates and/or talk-page only templates. I would be very happy if it could be restored to my sandbox, for example — User:CFCF/sanbdox/dropimage Best CFCF 💌 📧 11:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC) -CFCF 💌 📧 11:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- @CFCF: Done, userfied. It seemed the template was deleted because it wasn't in use, but someone commented in the discussion that some features of it should be adopted by the current 'hidden' template. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Geoffrey Spencer
- Geoffrey Spencer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I believe that there used to be a page about Geoffrey Spencer but I can no longer find it -82.71.60.39 (talk) 16:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- I can't find any trace of a deleted article under that name, even as a draft or AfC page. The nearest I found is that both Harold Williams (baritone) and Alexander Wilson (writer and spy) used the name as a pseudonym. Can you give any more details of the Spencer you are after? JohnCD (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- There is an article called Jeffrey Spencer though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Ben Polk
This article was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Polk. Because it was very clear that the player would be making a fully-profession debut with either Portland Timbers or Portland Timbers 2 I asked the closing admin (User:Sandstein) to move it to draftspace, however he declined on the basis that he wasn't familiar or comfortable with draft space. I was going to bring it to WP:REFUND however, before that happened Ben Polk made his professional debut for Portland Timbers 2 in the United Soccer League listed in WP:FPL as fully professional, thus meeting WP:NFOOTBALL. So I asked User:Sandstein to restore the article, however he declined as he was said knew nothing about the topic (sports). I was going to bring it to WP:REFUND however, before that happened someone recreated the article from scratch. So I then asked User:Sandstein to simply restore the edit history, however he declined because ... he just didn't know anything. So I am now asking someone here to restore the deleted edit history. -Nfitz (talk) 19:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Thanks, Nfitz (talk) 19:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Anjunabeats
- Anjunabeats · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Notability was disputed last June. I find that hard to believe for one of the most successful Trance labels of the last 10+ years. The label was nominated 5 times as Best Global Dance Record Label at the International Dance Music Awards in Miami (2009, 2010, 2012, 2015 and 2016) as well as two releases received a grammy nomination: Mat Zo - Damage Control as Best Dance/Electronica Album 2015 and Above & Beyond - We Are All We Need as Best Dance Recording 2016. The label had consecutively one of the strongest Trance roosters in the last years: http://www.anjunabeats.com/artists. On Beatport (arguably the most popular online music store for electronic music) Anjunabeats was ranked as the #1 Trance label for most of the last 5 years: http://www.beatstats.com/label/anjunabeats/804. It's easily one of the most notable labels of Category:Trance record labels. -Firefox13 (talk) 03:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjunabeats, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Davewild (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- I would say that falls under "little or no participation" as opposed to the sublabel Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjunadeep. But sure, I'll reach out to Davewild (talk · contribs). -- Firefox13 (talk) 04:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, he wasn't active in WP since Nov 4th, 2015. Can we reevaluate here, or should I go directly to deletion review? - Firefox13 (talk) 04:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- I would say that falls under "little or no participation" as opposed to the sublabel Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjunadeep. But sure, I'll reach out to Davewild (talk · contribs). -- Firefox13 (talk) 04:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Facebook messages
- Facebook messages · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -2602:306:83E9:2BB0:81E2:26E1:3313:D43 (talk) 04:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not done. No article by that name ever existed, either in main space or draft space. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:49, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Join Wth Us (song)
- Talk:Join Wth Us (song) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
The talk page was deleted by mistake. It should be moved without a redirect to Talk:Join With Us (song). -GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done Restored and moved. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Ekhanei.com
- Draft:Ekhanei.com · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Aditya Kabir, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aditya(talk • contribs) 05:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not done @Aditya Kabir: This is pretty unambiguously promotional, to the point where it needs an almost complete re-write to remove the promotional prose. The following sentence fragment is just an example of the promotional content:
-
- "Ekhanei runs innovative activities like selling autographed bats of Cricketing celebrities"
- I'll e-mail you the content, but it needs to be re-written. On a side note, if you were asked to create this by the company then you need to divulge this per WP:COI. This is just so promotionally written that it is reminiscent of similar articles written by paid editors. If you're not a paid editor or have some sort of COI, please be careful with how you phrase things since this is very similar to the type of writing that we see with paid editing. The same thing goes if this was taken from the mainspace (meaning that you didn't write this and were just trying to do a rescue) and you were trying to edit it to get re-accepted into the mainspace - promotional tones still shouldn't be in the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. :).
- @Tokyogirl79: It is difficult to write about a Bangladeshi company, with lack of sources and all. What you saw was one of the best written, and best sourced articles. It definitely needs improvement. The problem with drafts is that you will have no collaboration at all. So obviously it was taking a long time. The early edits was easy. But the subsequent edits became more and more difficult.
- Anyways, the subject is quite notable, and meets WP:NOTE and WP:ORG. Is it possible to userify the content? You can replace the content of User:Aditya Kabir/Sandbox 3, which happens to be an earlier draft of the article. Thanks. Aditya(talk • contribs) 04:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- I've e-mailed you the content, but I'll send it to you again. I'm just relatively hesitant about restoring something like that. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America
- Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -97.79.149.170 (talk) 13:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not done. The deletion log shows that this title has been protected against creation after repeated deletion as promotional. Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves. If you want to try again, use WP:Articles for creation to make a draft, read WP:Your first article for advice, and follow the excellent advice of an experienced user at User:Uncle G/On notability#Writing about subjects close to you:
"...don't use your own personal knowledge of the subject, and don't cite yourself, your web site, or the subject's web site. Instead, use what is written about the subject by other people, independently, as your sources. Cite those sources in your very first edit. If you don't have such sources, don't write."
Draft:Paint (musical group)
- Draft:Paint (musical group) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Jeepster33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jeepster33 (talk) 13:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Jeepster33: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:TEDxYouth@Columbia SC
- Draft:TEDxYouth@Columbia SC · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Wzrogers, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wzrogers (talk) 15:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Wzrogers: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note that, to be accepted, it will need references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (2)
- Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -64.251.40.254 (talk) 15:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Another LIfe: A Memoir of Other People
- Another Life: A Memoir of Other People · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I believe this was deleted in error. I am the author and I requested my draft to be deleted not the article, but both were. I would have contacted the admin directly--but their talk page does not accept messages. -23:49, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Jaldous1 (talk)
- @Jaldous1: Done. You did actually put the db tag on the article itself after moving it, but no harm done. JohnCD (talk) 09:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Whoops! Thank you. --Jaldous1 (talk) 23:35, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:BLOM Bank
- Draft:BLOM Bank Lebanon · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Ghinael, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ghinael (talk) 06:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
I want to re-edit the article and try to resubmit it for approval -Ghinael (talk) 06:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ghinae: Done but the article was at Draft:BLOM Bank Lebanon, not Draft:BLOM Bank. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Sarah Tse
There are more than one reference corresponding to the content and this page of the artist Sarah Tse is established for the 3rd Annual Art+Feminism �Wikipedia Edit-a-thon and as part of a class assignment. -GE1110cityu (talk) 07:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC) GE1110cityu (talk) 07:37, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- @GE1110cityu: Not done and will not be done. Because it was deleted multiple times in accordance with WP:CSD#G11 (being unambiguously promotional), it cannot be restored by request on this page. And because it contained copyright-violating content from https://sarah-tse.squarespace.com/about/ we cannot restore it under any circumstances. If this is part of a class assignment, your instructor should have already read and understood Wikipedia:Student assignments before assigning a project that resulted in serious Wikipedia policy violations. Please refer your instructor to that document as well as this reply. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Brandon M. Schickling
- Brandon M. Schickling · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I was not done editing/ adding content to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bschickl (talk • contribs) 07:38, 5 April 2016
- @Bschickl: Not done. Wikipedia is not a free web host. That article is a CV, not an encyclopedia article, and it would be speedily deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 if restored, and even if it included some assertion of significance to get past CSD A7, it would be deleted anyway for failing to meet WP:ACADEMIC criteria for inclusion. It wouldn't even be appropriate for your own user page, let alone the main article space. See also Wikipedia:Autobiography: you should not write about yourself on Wikipedia. Basically it's a LinkedIn profile. Please use LinkedIn for that. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marco Lienhard
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marco Lienhard · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Shaku8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shaku8 (talk) 15:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (3)
- Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
NACA provides a service that is needed and empowering to underserved and low income communities, that are largely populated by persons of color, and women. -2601:204:C480:71A3:9590:3124:9C25:D1D0 (talk) 15:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Good for them, but Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. For advice about how to make a Wikipedia article, see response to your first request about nine items higher up this page. JohnCD (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:HydroFLOWUSA
- Draft:HydroFLOWUSA · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
The reason the edits were not performed in a timely manner to make the page consistent with Wikipedia rules is that the person who originally created the page is no longer with the company. I will make the necessary changes so that the page is compliant. Thank you. -Hydroflow-USA (talk) 16:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not done @Hydroflow-USA: Well, you're blocked now, so you must follow the instructions in your block message to appeal your block and change your username to comply with Wikipedia:Username policy. Companies and roles are not allowed to have accounts on Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Onwards (The Wax Girl song)
- Draft:Onwards (The Wax Girl song) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, CumberdaleHubert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CumberdaleHubert (talk) 17:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:AfroDigital
- Draft:AfroDigital · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Legasey (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Maurice Claypole
- Draft:Maurice Claypole · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 91.2.223.253, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 91.2.223.253 (talk) 10:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Still working on it -91.2.223.253 (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done I've restored it, but I do want to impress upon you the importance of using non-primary sources and properly citing them. Just saying that he's published somewhere and putting the source as "Guardian Weekly (Learning English section)" is not good enough. Simply publishing isn't going to establish notability and what you've put as a source is so general that there's no real way that we could verify that. Ideally you'd want a link to the publication - however I need to stress that someone can publish in notable outlets yet not gain notability, so there's no true need to list everything that someone has done. Also, be careful of the section "Contributions to English language teaching". Not only does this have the ability to be inherently promotional (something that would keep the article from publishing on that factor alone) but you also sourced this with Claypole's own work. In order to show that he's had an impact on others you need to cite other sources that make these assertions and have those sources be in independent and reliable places. Just writing and saying things doesn't mean that someone had an impact and you'll never be able to establish this with primary sources. I'm going to post this on the article so I can make sure that you see it. I do have to warn you - if this gets repeatedly declined then it's unlikely to get continually restored since there'd be a concern about the article never getting accepted. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
User:Athomeeditor/sandbox (G 13 (TW))
- User:Athomeeditor/sandbox · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I intend to continue work on this soon, and then click the "Save page" button below -Athomeeditor (talk) 16:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
St Luke Missionary Hospice
- St Luke Missionary Hospice · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Page randomly deleted? -—Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- The page was deleted because its creator had blanked it. Admins generally view such edits as a tacit request to delete. (Note: I merely fixed the template; I am not the requestor.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @67.239.166.185: The page creator (Krishna Chaitanya Velaga) asked for deletion, stating that it was non-notable. However even without that, I don't think that we'd really be able to restore this because the article was also fairly promotional in tone, with sentences like "Experts of the company care for the patients and serve them with the superior end-of life quality care for effective results in terms of the treatment procedure." Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Colin Moriarty
- Colin Moriarty · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -68.39.10.215 (talk) 03:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Moriarty, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Juliancolton (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Instasafe
Page has been Deleted under Promotions Cause. -Kishore.Gurram (talk) 06:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Kishore.Gurram: Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
- If you want to try again, you will need references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. If you can provide them, I suggest that you use WP:Articles for creation to guide you through the process. If you are employed by or connected with the company, read WP:PSCOI and note that you must declare your interest, as explained at WP:PAID. JohnCD (talk) 17:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Ravinder Kasala
- Ravinder Kasala · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ravinder Kasala (talk) 13:08, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ravinderreddy.kasala: Not done, Wikipedia is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves. Try LinkedIn or Facebook. JohnCD (talk) 17:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Dollar Cravings.jpg
- File:Dollar Cravings.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Permission confirmed by OTRS ticket 2014122210010452 --- Rrburke (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Rrburke: this was tagged by B on 14 April 2015 with that ticket number, but with edit summary "OTRS received, but not sufficient to confirm permission". Do you have a better permission since that date? JohnCD (talk) 17:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @JohnCD: Yes, the user posted a Facebook message confirming his identity and granting permission to publish under a free license (the Facebook account is the source of the image). -- Rrburke (talk) 17:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Werrenrath Camp
- Draft:Werrenrath Camp · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Would like to have more time to reference the article which expands on the current Wikipedia article of the same title -199.241.214.133 (talk) 20:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Then just expand Werrenrath Camp directly. Drafts about existing topics are never accepted. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- The draft also had some relatively promotional material, as it contained words like "premier" and generally came across like a brochure you'd read on something. This also makes me slightly suspicious that the material might have come from another source and is closely paraphrased, which would make it a potential WP:COPYVIO. You can edit the mainspace version, but please be careful when choosing your wording and make sure that you don't copy a previously published work too closely. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Delta Sigma Iota
- Delta Sigma Iota · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
The wikipedia page for Delta Sigma Iota was deleted in 2012 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Delta_Sigma_Iota) for the organization being not notable, not having many chapters, not having coverage in third party news articles, or and not falling under a national umbrella organization. Since then the organization has expanded and met all of these criterias. The organization has an official presence in over seven major universities http://www.deltasigmaiota.org/chapters--colonies.html in multiple states. Additionally, the organization has also been recognized by the National Asian Pacific Islander Pan-Hellenic Association (http://www.napahq.org/about/#organizations). There are also several news article references in a google news search (https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#tbm=nws&q=%22delta+sigma+iota%22). Accordingly I am asking that the article be restored. If the history was not retained by Wikipedia, it appears that a copy of the article was archived here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hornofgabriel/Delta_Sigma_Iota -Ajish (talk) 05:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Sigma Iota, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- We can't restore AfD'd articles and you'd have to talk to Mark Arsten about restoring the article, as he was the deleting admin. I do have to warn you that part of establishing notability for organizations is that the organization (fraternities are subject to WP:NORG) is that you have to show where the coverage is in-depth and in places Wikipedia would consider to be independent and reliable. Just linking to a Google search doesn't really help much since you'd have to show that each news source meets the criteria of WP:RS. This can be tough to do since in a lot of cases Greek organizations will get brief mentions or the source will be somewhat WP:PRIMARY since the coverage will be from a campus newspaper or the like. For example, this link came up in the search, but it's primary (since it's the university's website) and the fraternity is only briefly mentioned. The same thing goes for this news article, since it's by a student newspaper. Now when it comes to chapters, the expectation is that the fraternity will have many, many chapters (likely more than just seven) on top of extensive coverage. Having multiple chapters and being recognized by a larger association can make it more likely that they'll gain coverage, but it's not a guarantee. Now as far as the draft article goes, I've deleted it since it's a copyright violation from this website, as whole paragraphs were directly taken. If you're going to edit any copy of the article, it'd be best to do the one that was deleted at AfD since that's far more neutrally written and doesn't contain any copyright violations. I'm not against this being recreated, but I need to stress that you'll have to provide a lot of coverage to establish notability. Just linking to a Google search isn't enough - you need to give specific examples of news coverage to help argue that the fraternity would now pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- I see that you approached Arsten already, who told you to go to WP:DRV, which is a separate area. My recommendation is that before you go to DRV, that you try making an article at WP:AfC. It's likely that you're a member of the organization and while there's no rule that you can't make an article, it's recommended that you go through AfC and if the article is accepted, try to minimize your edits to the article after it goes live in order to avoid some of the issues posed at WP:COI. In any case, making a new draft can help you make your case at DRV sometimes. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Henri du Couëdic
- Draft:Henri du Couëdic · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Maxlii (talk) 06:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Maxlii: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Company of Angels
- Draft:Company of Angels · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Phoebefr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Phoebefr (talk) 12:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Phoebefr: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Jay Winik by Carl Caruso, 2015.jpg
- File:Jay Winik by Carl Caruso, 2015.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Permission confirmed by OTRS ticket 2015110510024765 --- Rrburke (talk) 13:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (4)
- Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Page should be restored because the claims of lack of notability were not valid. Numerous references to outside sources were incorporated into the page as per Wikipedia guidelines to substantiate corresponding parts of the narrative contained in the page. We believe that the deletion was in fact malicious in nature, most likely originated by those who are politically opposed to NACA's mission or who we were not able to help become homeowners or save their home from foreclosure, and originated the deletion as a petty form of revenge.
NACA's history was indeed accurately reflected within the page and is more than worthy of inclusion as a result of its quarter-century of history and its impact on the United States mortgage crisis.
We respectfully request and insist on the restoration of the page. It is indeed factual, more than adequately referenced, and its absence removes an important piece for a key part of contemporary American history. In addition to our previous request (repeated below), it should be noted that other Wikipedia articles related to mortgages and the US mortgage crisis make reference to NACA, further verifying its notability and validity. Those articles include:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=Neighborhood+Assistance+Corporation+of+America&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreclosure_rescue_scheme https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boston_Globe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_(disambiguation) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortgage_Bankers_Association https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detria_Russell https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loan_modification_in_the_United_States
These articles are incomplete and do not contain all possible citations and references as a result of the deletion of the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America article.
Once again, we respectfully request and insist that the factual and properly referenced Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America Article be undeleted immediately. -206.229.192.132 (talk) 13:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, but that is NOT how it works. All articles must abide by our notability policies and don't get a pass because they're related to things that are themselves independently notable. Second, the page has been protected against creation because it's been repeatedly deleted as spam. (G11s are a matter of tone, not sourcing; it's possible to have a well-sourced article that nonetheless fails G11.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Patrick Levy
- Draft:Patrick Levy · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Nectar2014, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nectar2014 (talk) 13:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Phillip A Hall III
- Phillip A Hall III · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
How Are You, In reply To My Undelete Request Above At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#https:.2F.2Fen.wikipedia.org.2Fwiki.2FPhillip_Allen_Hall_III_2 I Was Asked To Rewrite My Article, But I'm Unable To Edit Or Correct My WiKi Page At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillip_A_Hall_III Due To It Only Able To Be Created By A Administrator Like You. So, Can You Please Create My WiKi Page With My References Such As My News Article At http://SilverScreenMag.PHILLIPHALL.INFO & Bio At http://www.PHILLIPHALL.INFO/Bio.php My Photo Can Be Seen & Downloaded On My Website With Exact Link At http://www.philliphall.info/images/f6a5ec9bd072e0ebe47a93ada55064d4_zlxo.jpg All *Copyrights Are Public & Are Able To Be Used. Thanks Again!
---
My External Links Are Below
My Category Is Should Be Actor
And My Info Box Should Be Coded As Below With The Image Downloaded At
<deletia>
My References Are Below http://www.webcitation.org/6gRth5tYZ http://www.philliphall.info/Bio.php http://media.philliphall.info
Pahall1984 (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- That is not only not how things work, but there's a lot of other issues:
- None of the sources you provide are usable. We can't use primary sources, social media, wikis (such as IMDb) or sources that Mr. Hall has any influence over.
- Copyright is automatically all rights reserved unless explicitly disclaimed or explicitly released under a copyleft licence. Note that Wikipedia cannot use images or text with the No Derivative Works or Noncommercial prongs.
- Pages do not get protected against creation unless they have been repeatedly recreated or the content/title is so beyond the pale that it's detrimental to leave it available.
- All subjects on Wikipedia must be, in and of themselves, notable. An A7 deletion indicates that the article didn't even try to explain why he was notable.
- A7 and G12 deletions are generally not undeleted here, especially not if the target page is creation-protected.
- Hope this clears things up. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:SlipSafe
- Draft:SlipSafe · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Eva1403, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eva1403 (talk) 14:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Nick Marsh (musician)
- Draft:Nick Marsh (musician) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 80.169.172.250, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I think the article was deleted because it hasn't been edited in 6 months. I think it can be made ready and good for publication. -80.169.172.250 (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Soo K. Chan Profile.jpg
- File:Soo K. Chan Profile.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
A valid permission has been received, see ticket:2015092910019418 -Jcb (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
21:47, 8 April 2016 Sphilbrick (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Systemic operational design (G 13 (TW))
- Draft:Systemic operational design · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Guy Duczynski (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
I have no idea how to find my way back to the page. Welcome to the frustrations of a first time user
-
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Almonte Music Scene 1990s
- Draft:Almonte Music Scene 1990s · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, 24.91.235.194, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.91.235.194 (talk) 08:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
blockstream
- Blockstream · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Notable article I would like to work on. If you dont agree, please have an admin put the page content on my talk page so I can use it to recreate it. Thank you! -Jtbobwaysf (talk) 12:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Jtbobwaysf: there has never been an article Blockstream. There is a (very skeleton) draft at Draft:Blockstream - suggest you develop that. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Perfect, thank you :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtbobwaysf (talk • contribs) 19:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @JohnCD: Hi John, I did some work on the article tonight and would like to publish it as a new article. How do I do that so that it get's reviewed by patrol? Do I just remove {draft article} tag and replace it with a different tag for patrol? If yes, what is that tag, I couldn't find it in a google search. Little confused here, I have never gone from a draft to a new article before. Thank you! :-) Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Jtbobwaysf: see WP:Drafts#Publishing a draft. You can move it directly into the main space with the "Move" function (which may be hidden in a drop-down menu under "More"). Be careful to choose "(Article)", not "Wikipedia" in the left-hand drop-down menu on the Move page. Then replace the {{Draft article}} template at the top with {{New unreviewed article}}. Alternatively, if you would like to get it more formally reviewed by the WP:Articles for creation process, instead of moving it you can put {{subst:submit}} at the top. JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @JohnCD: Hi John, huge thank you. Learned something new today on wikipedia. :-) Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Jtbobwaysf: see WP:Drafts#Publishing a draft. You can move it directly into the main space with the "Move" function (which may be hidden in a drop-down menu under "More"). Be careful to choose "(Article)", not "Wikipedia" in the left-hand drop-down menu on the Move page. Then replace the {{Draft article}} template at the top with {{New unreviewed article}}. Alternatively, if you would like to get it more formally reviewed by the WP:Articles for creation process, instead of moving it you can put {{subst:submit}} at the top. JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
founders network
- Founders Network · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
This is my first page and I mirrored what was done for similar wikipages describing the Young Presidents Organisation and the Entrepreneurs Organisation (you will see copyright issues on those too as their mandate etc is a copy paste from the organisation's sites). I can easily edit the material deemed copyrighted. I have no conflict of interest with this organisation, just want to see it featured. Thank you for considering! -Alexandragreenhill (talk) 17:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC) Alexandragreenhill (talk) 17:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Not done We do not want chucks of text copied off web sites. So it would be better to start again from scratch. DO not just copy http://foundersnetwork.com/blog/about-us/ For a first article it would be best to start at Draft:Founders Network and then you might get time to sort out the promotional tone problems. Copying text from organization web sites will very often get a promotional edge to it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Lucky Star Single Cover.jpg
- File:Lucky Star Single Cover.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Can history logs of this file be restored? Not the previous versions; just history logs. -George Ho (talk) 20:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- History logs of the file description page, of the previous files (like for the 23:36, 12 December 2014 version), or both? —Cryptic 20:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Cassius Jay
- Draft:Cassius Jay · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
have additional citations now -Acalipeach (talk) 23:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
2015–16 1. FSV Mainz 05 season
- 2015–16 1. FSV Mainz 05 season · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Deleted for A1, would like to get a chance to expand the article. -Secret Agent Julio (talk) 23:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Done restored to Draft:2015–16 1. FSV Mainz 05 season. Move it to article space when the page is ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Guy Morrison (author and playwright)
- Draft:Guy Morrison (author and playwright) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Rod mcinnes, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rod mcinnes (talk) 07:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Heroes in the Healing of the Nation
- Heroes in the Healing of the Nation · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
On 16 November 2012, the article was deleted because of "Expired PROD, concern was: Hardly a notable album. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NALBUMS)." However, it has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, including HipHopDX [7], Okayplayer [8], PopMatters [9], and The Phoenix [10]. Additionally, it has appeared on the U.S. Billboard charts, including Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums [11], Independent Albums [12], and Heatseekers Albums [13]. I believe it meets WP:NALBUMS #1 and #2 and am contesting PROD. -153.173.68.59 (talk) 11:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Broadcom (disambiguation)
- Broadcom (disambiguation) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Please userfy. I especially want to reference the associated talk page because it contained an important discussion. thanks -Talk to SageGreenRider 12:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
'Radіo Lem.fm
It article was speedly deleted for Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A7 while "No indication of importance" was found.
But since I slready find several independents sources (while most of these are written in Rusyn and Polish). see also User_talk:Golodg#Speedy deletion nomination of 'Radіo Lem.fm Also there are interwikis with
Original of this article:
- rue:Радіо_Лем.фм
- ru:Радио_Лем.фм into Russian
This Radіo Lem.fm is about ONLY Radio in Lemkos language around all world