jeh
|
Recent edit to Serial ATA
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Laber□T 22:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- The "content of my edit" has been in the article for quite some time; I merely restored it after an unjustified deletion (on NPOV grounds: The remark that the four-pin Molex connector is "decades old" is not a "point of view", it is historical fact). I am well familiar with WP:NOT and I see nothing that runs counter to those two words - please be specific as to which item there you're talking about? 'cause I can't see it. On the other hand, historical perspective is a valuable aspect of technical information, particularly when discussing a new technology that's replaced an older one. I will be restoring that information in some form or other. Jeh (talk) 22:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Look familiar?
User:Allnewsradio! - BilCat (talk) 05:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- @BilCat: Thanks. Reported. btw unlike some reports like ANI, there is no real need to notify suspected sockpuppets of SPI reports. Doing so might alert them to switch accounts again. Jeh (talk) 07:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
User:Sky Sports News HQ just showed up today. There aren't enough edits yet for me to be certain it's Dung, but it's worth watching. - BilCat (talk) 14:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- @BilCat: & Jeh, it looks like AllNewsKCBS (talk · contribs) is the new name of the day. On the talk page the user wrote "I'm very nervous as my account can be blocked at any time". Hmmm. Yup, guess what that editor is editing...news and N/T stations.Stereorock (talk) 13:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- He left a message on my talk page, and it's quite clear from it that it is Dung247. I gave him an answer to what he should do, but I doubt he'll be able to follow it. He has a lot in common with many users we get on WP who seem compulsively obsessive about editing, and aren't willing or able to adapt to collaborative editing and following the MOS. - BilCat (talk) 22:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Jeh (talk | contribs) at 09:36, 24 April 2016 (Undid revision 716852233 by Goudlas
Jeh, My apologies, you are right I was wrong. My edit of the article was incorrect, I was looking at the connectors from the pin out side. Thank you for correcting my mistake. Keep up the good work.
Goudlas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goudlas (talk • contribs) 07:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- The text probably should clarify that we're looking at the cable side, not "the side where the pins go". You could do that... btw, a leading space kicks you into "plaintext mode", as seen above. Dunno if you want that, but if not, don't start lines with spaces. Cheers! Jeh (talk) 15:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)