Contents
- 1 Karlsruhe and Erich Förste
- 2 Thanks for your support
- 3 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Re di Portogallo
- 4 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Re d'Italia
- 5 No signature on this block notice
- 6 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Re di Portogallo
- 7 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Re d'Italia
- 8 The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
- 9 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Ancona
- 10 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano
- 11 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Messina
- 12 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano
- 13 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Messina
- 14 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Castelfidardo
- 15 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad San Martino
- 16 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo
- 17 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo
- 18 Wikipedia:WikiProject Wales/Awaken the Dragon
- 19 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Caio Duilio
- 20 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Partenope
- 21 Your GA nomination of USS Montana (ACR-13)
- 22 Mališan
- 23 Your GA nomination of Caio Duilio-class ironclad
- 24 Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Caio Duilio
- 25 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Partenope
- 26 Your GA nomination of Caio Duilio-class ironclad
- 27 Disruptive editing on Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
- 28 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Minerva
- 29 Your GA nomination of Roma-class ironclad
- 30 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Minerva
- 31 Your GA nomination of SMS Kaiser Max (1862)
- 32 Your GA nomination of SMS Kaiser Max (1862)
- 33 Your GA nomination of Principe Amedeo-class ironclad
- 34 Your GA nomination of Principe Amedeo-class ironclad
- 35 O class Battle Cruiser Germany.
- 36 Your GA nomination of Roma-class ironclad
- 37 Your GA nomination of USS Montana (ACR-13)
- 38 Your GA nomination of SMS Kaiser Max (1862)
- 39 The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
- 40 Your GA nomination of SMS Tegetthoff (1878)
- 41 Your GA nomination of SMS Kronprinz Erzherzog Rudolf
- 42 Your GA nomination of SMS Kronprinzessin Erzherzogin Stephanie
- 43 March 2016 Military History Writers' Contest
- 44 Your GA nomination of SMS Kronprinz Erzherzog Rudolf
- 45 Proposed move for List of Americans detained by North Korea
- 46 January to March 2016 Quarterly Article Reviews
- 47 Your GA nomination of SMS Tegetthoff (1878)
- 48 Your GA nomination of SMS Kronprinzessin Erzherzogin Stephanie
- 49 Spahkruezer update.
- 50 barnstar
- 51 Disambiguation link notification for April 23
- 52 Your GA nomination of SMS Prinz Eugen (1862)
- 53 Your GA nomination of SMS Prinz Eugen (1862)
- 54 Your GA nomination of SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865)
- 55 Your GA nomination of SMS Prinz Eugen (1862)
- 56 Your GA nomination of SMS Juan de Austria
- 57 Your GA nomination of SMS Juan de Austria
- 58 The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
- 59 GANs
- 60 Your GA nomination of SMS Habsburg (1865)
- 61 Your GA nomination of SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865)
- 62 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Euridice
- 63 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Urania
- 64 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Iride
- 65 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Aretusa
- 66 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Caprera
- 67 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Calatafimi
- 68 Your GA nomination of SMS Habsburg (1865)
- 69 File:Deutschland Kaiserfahrt.png listed for discussion
- 70 Useful?
- 71 HMS Thunderer (1872)
- 72 Re: USS Wyoming (BB-32) --: my edit of 20:56, 6 May 2016
- 73 Romanian cruiser Elisabeta
- 74 Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Euridice
- 75 Spahkruezer update. may 11
Karlsruhe and Erich Förste
Do you mind if I add Erich Förste to the Karlsruhe article? Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your support
Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Re di Portogallo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian ironclad Re di Portogallo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Re d'Italia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian ironclad Re d'Italia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
No signature on this block notice
Hey Parsecboy. I'm not sure if it's required for block notices, but there was no signature left[1] for this IP that was blocked. Boomer VialHolla 02:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- No, it's not required, and I generally don't use them - it tends to cut down on the frequency of IPs coming to vandalize my talk page. Parsecboy (talk) 11:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Re di Portogallo
The article Italian ironclad Re di Portogallo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian ironclad Re di Portogallo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Re d'Italia
The article Italian ironclad Re d'Italia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian ironclad Re d'Italia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Ancona
The article Italian ironclad Ancona you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian ironclad Ancona for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 23:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 04:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Messina
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian ironclad Messina you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 05:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano
The article Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 05:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Messina
The article Italian ironclad Messina you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian ironclad Messina for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 05:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Castelfidardo
The article Italian ironclad Castelfidardo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian ironclad Castelfidardo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad San Martino
The article Italian ironclad San Martino you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian ironclad San Martino for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 12:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo
The article Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 20:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Wales/Awaken the Dragon
Hi, can I interest you and page stalkers in participating in April? Up to £200 in Amazon vouchers and books up for grabs.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Caio Duilio
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian ironclad Caio Duilio you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Partenope
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian cruiser Partenope you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Montana (ACR-13)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Montana (ACR-13) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Mališan
Not sure if you forgot about this one, but I answered your remarks regarding a disputed source over a month ago. If you're short on free time in real life, I don't have a problem waiting, just let me know.--Saxum (talk) 10:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Whoops, I thought I had finished that up a long time ago. Thanks for reminding me. Parsecboy (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Caio Duilio-class ironclad
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Caio Duilio-class ironclad you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:41, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian ironclad Caio Duilio
The article Italian ironclad Caio Duilio you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian ironclad Caio Duilio for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 17:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Partenope
The article Italian cruiser Partenope you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian cruiser Partenope for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 17:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Caio Duilio-class ironclad
The article Caio Duilio-class ironclad you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Caio Duilio-class ironclad for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Disruptive editing on Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
Hi Nate, would you consider protecting or semi-protecting this in the face of persistent anonymous edits violating Not censored? Doesn't appear to be a static IP so not sure if it's worth trying to warn or block... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:33, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sure, I just semi-protected it for a week - I can re-apply if they start back up once it expires.
- This edit summary gave me a bit of a chuckle. Do they know that the internet is accessible to minors? "Fucker" is hardly the worst thing they can find. Parsecboy (talk) 12:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Minerva
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian cruiser Minerva you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Roma-class ironclad
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roma-class ironclad you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Minerva
The article Italian cruiser Minerva you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian cruiser Minerva for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 10:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Kaiser Max (1862)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Kaiser Max (1862) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khanate General -- Khanate General (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Kaiser Max (1862)
The article SMS Kaiser Max (1862) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SMS Kaiser Max (1862) for things which need to be addressed. --Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 18:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Principe Amedeo-class ironclad
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Principe Amedeo-class ironclad you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khanate General -- Khanate General (talk) 01:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Principe Amedeo-class ironclad
The article Principe Amedeo-class ironclad you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Principe Amedeo-class ironclad for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khanate General -- Khanate General (talk) 11:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
O class Battle Cruiser Germany.
Hello Parsecboy, I know its been almost a year and I apologize for that. I have posted a new profile pic of the O class Battle cruiser for the use in the article on the O class battle Cruiser. I have been working on it more lately however it is still being mapped with small details. If it doesn't seem complete enough then I suggest to watch for updates that I plan to post real soon as in within the week. I figured if I at least posted it on the site that it would motivate me to keep the work going. I have been working on 4 large Physical models. One is a model of the Starship Enterprise from the original series that measures at 13 feet long. I have kicked Myself a bit to finish these ship illustrations though so I can get the book published on Amazon, Kendal. I'm probably losing money for not doing so. Anyway, You did a great job editing the D class article. I will work on making some angle shots also if You would like some of those. Let Me know, and I promise to not be such a stranger in the future. Haratio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haratio Fales (talk • contribs) 04:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
I added 2 angle shots, and will work more on the Model tomorrow and in the next few days. I want to finish with it somewhat as to get onto the P class ship design next. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haratio Fales (talk • contribs) 05:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Not a problem at all, we all get busy with other things. Good work so far on the O class model, I've added all three images to the article (and the main image to List of battlecruisers of Germany). I'll look forward to see the work you do on it, and the P-class one as well! Parsecboy (talk) 12:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
I have actually laid out the P class cruiser but it is the hull with the guns in place. I need to ad the superstructure and detail the small parts and details. I have also in the last day drawn and almost finished the SpahKruiser hull. It was kind of part of the Plan Z ship projects and yet not. Even after Plan Z was canceled they were still planning to build 3 of the Spahkruzers in the final 1940 configuration. They ordered the powerplants and canceled the ships. they used the engines in other Destroyers. Anyway TY, and Ill keep sending updates, and finish the O class. It mostly needs the front railing and ballords, cleats, and the porthole work, which is somewhat done on the model, I just haven't 2D mapped it yet. Oh and the anchors and chains with the windlasses and that should be about it. I modeled the crane for the O class but I need to model a few different types in the future, along with a few spotlights, however those can be added. I need to also ad the optic doors to the 15cm guns. LOL I am getting a lot of this done so I can finish My book that I have been dragging My feet on for over a year. I could actually make some gas money if I kick myself hard enough to stay focused and do this stuff. TY again Your Wiki friend, Haratio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haratio Fales (talk • contribs) 20:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. I still need to write up the Spaehkreuzer article - haven't gotten around to it yet. You know how that goes ;) Thanks for keeping me in the loop about your projects - I bet it'll be nice to get the book finally done. Parsecboy (talk) 16:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Roma-class ironclad
The article Roma-class ironclad you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roma-class ironclad for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 21:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Montana (ACR-13)
The article USS Montana (ACR-13) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Montana (ACR-13) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Kaiser Max (1862)
The article SMS Kaiser Max (1862) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SMS Kaiser Max (1862) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khanate General -- Khanate General (talk) 06:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Tegetthoff (1878)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Tegetthoff (1878) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Kronprinz Erzherzog Rudolf
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Kronprinz Erzherzog Rudolf you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Kronprinzessin Erzherzogin Stephanie
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Kronprinzessin Erzherzogin Stephanie you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016 Military History Writers' Contest
The WikiChevrons | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons, for placing first in the March 2016 Military History Article Writing Contest with an incredible 97 points from 13 articles. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 04:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of SMS Kronprinz Erzherzog Rudolf
The article SMS Kronprinz Erzherzog Rudolf you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SMS Kronprinz Erzherzog Rudolf for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Proposed move for List of Americans detained by North Korea
There's a proposal to rename this page to List of foreign nationals detained in North Korea [2]. Since you had previously weighed in on that discussion topic, I wanted to see whether you have any views on the proposed move. TheBlueCanoe 13:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
January to March 2016 Quarterly Article Reviews
Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) | ||
On behalf of the WikiProject Military history coordinators, I hereby award you this for your contribution of 10 FA, A-Class, Peer and/or GA reviews during the period January to March 2016. Thank you for your efforts! Anotherclown (talk) 10:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of SMS Tegetthoff (1878)
The article SMS Tegetthoff (1878) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SMS Tegetthoff (1878) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Kronprinzessin Erzherzogin Stephanie
The article SMS Kronprinzessin Erzherzogin Stephanie you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SMS Kronprinzessin Erzherzogin Stephanie for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Spahkruezer update.
I edited the Spahkruezer article stub slightly. I changed the 2 classes to 3 classes, as they had designed 3 even though they only seemed to show 2 on Kriegsmarine.de. I also sited Kriegsmarine.de as a source. I added a basic line illustration for the Spahkruezer 1940 design in the commons. You might not wish to put it in the article yet, as it only shows the hull from top and bottom. It is just the beginning layout template for the size layout. I have continued to detail the O class illustration also, and hope to finish that soon. I am close to finishing the E book for Kindle about the ships, I just need to keep on the ship illustrations themselves. I have thought about writing a Wiki article on the phoney plans of German ships that have cropped up on the internet forums, and in World of Warships. I do plan to write a chapter about it in My book. Let Me know what You think about that as it is not a bout anything real I don't know if it belongs in here. Anyway I just wanted to update you. Haratio.
- Thanks - I really ought to get around to rewriting that article. Lately I've been working on the Austrian ironclads that fought at Lissa - I more or less finished with SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865) this morning. We can hold off adding the image of the ship until you're done (or close to it).
- I don't know if an article about the fake ships would work - probably the closest articles we have are on ships that were planned but not actually constructed. At some point someone tried to create an article on the supposed H-45, which had been created on a forum somewhere, but that got deleted. Parsecboy (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
I will work on the Illustration for the Spahkruezer. I plan to do at least 2 models, and possibly 3, as the 1939 design and the 1940 were relatively the same other than the Plane and torpedo set up. I have been spending a little time working on the O class illustration. I made that to big, but it works. When I finish the spah's and M class light cruisers, and the H class BBs and so on, Ill go back and fix the size issue on the O class. I have to model new turrets for the Spah designs due to that they were destroyer turrets and were shaped different than the Mains on the M class, or the secondaries like on Bismarck. I can write a draft about the Phoney ship designs later and see what You think. I am going to write about it in My book. The premise as an article is to state the ships, stories, and how they seemed to show up on the internet in forums, yet lack any substanciated proof. Its not that big of a deal if it cant be used on here, but it will ad an interesting chapter to My book as I can present it in a more conjectural setting. I will update and let you know as I get more done on the illustrations. As I illustrate the H class designs, that should add considerable imagery to that article. The M class was the first model I made in blender however I messed it up and need to redo it. It is one of My favorite ships as I have a 9 foot scratch built hull that I am working on also in My shop. TY again. Haratio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haratio Fales (talk • contribs) 07:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
barnstar
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
For laudatory work reviewing, and contributing, GANs. LavaBaron (talk) 06:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SMS Habsburg (1865), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pola (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Prinz Eugen (1862)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Prinz Eugen (1862) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Prinz Eugen (1862)
The article SMS Prinz Eugen (1862) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SMS Prinz Eugen (1862) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 10:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Prinz Eugen (1862)
The article SMS Prinz Eugen (1862) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SMS Prinz Eugen (1862) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 00:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Juan de Austria
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Juan de Austria you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Juan de Austria
The article SMS Juan de Austria you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SMS Juan de Austria for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
GANs
Don't forget about Talk:Boadicea-class cruiser/GA1 and Talk:Blonde-class cruiser/GA1
- Thanks for the note - they're both passed. Parsecboy (talk) 19:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Brillant!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Habsburg (1865)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Habsburg (1865) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865)
The article SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SMS Erzherzog Ferdinand Max (1865) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 09:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Euridice
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian cruiser Euridice you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Urania
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian cruiser Urania you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Iride
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian cruiser Iride you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Aretusa
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian cruiser Aretusa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Caprera
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian cruiser Caprera you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Calatafimi
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian cruiser Calatafimi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of SMS Habsburg (1865)
The article SMS Habsburg (1865) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SMS Habsburg (1865) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Deutschland Kaiserfahrt.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Deutschland Kaiserfahrt.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Useful?
Up at my usual hour of the night, scouring the internet. ;-) Found this, is it useful? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, just found File:SMS Kaiser.png. The one above might be of better quality, your call. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think the first one is better quality - I'll upload it over the old one in a little while. Amusingly, I was just waking up when you posted it ;) Parsecboy (talk) 10:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah yeah ;-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think the first one is better quality - I'll upload it over the old one in a little while. Amusingly, I was just waking up when you posted it ;) Parsecboy (talk) 10:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
HMS Thunderer (1872)
How the hell does this fit with BRD? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Do please be polite on my talk page. You added the material, he partially reverted your additions, and you restored them. Let the discussion run its course or we can start discussing edit-warring in more detail. Plain and simple. Parsecboy (talk) 19:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Re: USS Wyoming (BB-32) --: my edit of 20:56, 6 May 2016
Re: USS Wyoming (BB-32) (and now also HMS Hannibal)
Please reconsider.
The referenced source is not a personal website. This is the collection of the actual logbook entries of British ships. See http://www.naval-history.net/OWShips-WW1-05-HMS_Lancaster.htm
Above the line that reads "22 September 1914" as header for the transcript, you will see the link to the original hand-written log: http://oldweather.s3.amazonaws.com/ADM_53-46000/ADM%2053-46000-013_1.jpg
You can't get much better than this, for source material. On the other hand, I have asked an acquaintance at the "Naval History & Heritage Command" to look for the deck log of the USS Wyoming to corroborate the information and to check up on the Wyoming's response to the 13-gun salute.
Respectfully, Wkboonec (talk) 20:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's a personal website that purports to host hand-transcribed ship logs. Not exactly what I'd call reliable, and there are certainly much better sources. Parsecboy (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's got scans of the original logbooks, so I'd have to rate it considerably higher than that. There are occasionally transcription errors, especially for ship names, but they can be pretty easily rectified by looking at the scans.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
This also applies to your rejection of my edit of the HMS Hannibal entry: ships' logs are a key source, and having compared this site's transcriptions with my own inspection of logs in the UK National Archives, they appear to be wholly reliable (with the usual transcription slips, where the original handwriting is problematic!). The more one compares archival material such as this with the 'standard' sources, the more problematic the latter become, no matter how distinguished the author (and the more one checks Burt against the archival material, the more the detail errors multiply; don't get me started on 'Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships') .... Disallowing on-line transcriptions of logs simply because they are are on a 'personal' website means that these 'standard source' errors will be perpetuated in Wikipedia for ever, as the likelihood of the UK National Archives ever putting the logs 'officially' on line is zero - I can't think of what you mean as 'much better sources' for ships' log data (especially as Wikipedia disallows 'original research', which as I understand it includes one's own inspection of archival data!). AMDC
Romanian cruiser Elisabeta
79.113.134.115 is continuing to add Galati shipyard to the builder section of the infobox. He's gotten a couple other warnings for tendentious editing so you might consider more severe punishment.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Dealt with, I think. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Italian cruiser Euridice
The article Italian cruiser Euridice you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian cruiser Euridice for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Spahkruezer update. may 11
I just wanted to let You know that I have added the main gun detail and structure to the Spahkruezer illustration. It shows enough detail for the basic understanding of what the ship would have looked like. I need to resize it though as it doesn't blow up enough like the other 2. Ty Haratio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haratio Fales (talk • contribs) 03:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)