![]() Archives |
---|
Threads older than 7 days may be archived by ClueBot III. |
Contents
Naoum Mokarzel
Hi Canalec I appreciate your help, it comforts me. The fact is that I did for several years an accurate research on Naoum Mocarzel, and Salloum Mokarzel life achievements, I was happy if someone, without changing the facts I archeologically discovered, contribute and make it better, that is great, there is people in Wikipedia, that with the help "offer" are obstacles, with the argument that I don’t understand this or that, of course, if someone does not know history they are not going to understand, so I explain, give more sources, etc. Now he claim mi references are not reliable, please check them. The New York Times; Arab American Historian; The Society for Orthodox Christian History in the Americas (orthodoxhistory.org); Joseph Nathan Kane book More First Facts; University of Minnesota Immigration History Research Center; Annual report of the Commissioner of Patents for the year; After this “argument” I know is never going to be all right for them. since they threaten me for immediate deletion, if I don’t take their help, (offering “protection”) if you check the article I made, it is set for immediate deletion of course by another user, minute after the last message. Imagine I am going to hand wrestle, one and later anther user for trying to contribute with un refutable sources. Come on. who needs that. I try to contribute with culture, for accurate History, it was unwelcome. Mi contributions in Lebanon, etc reverted. So to please Wikipedia I blank Naoum Mokarzel and Salloum Mokarzel articles I made. If Wikipedia wants accurate history, or want to feed the myth, actions will be done. But not by me. I did not try to offend no one. Just contribute with history. Thank you, --Trinity Abbey (talk) 11:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Trinity Abbey I hadn't realised that you created the page. I've deleted it for you. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Thinking of a "pp-unsourced" template
I was just looking around some protection templates, and then I just was thinking about adding a pp-unsourced template. I was thinking of it being similar to the format of your pp-sock template, except with the reason being "to promote compliance with Wikipedia's policy on verifiability". If you like this idea, I would appreciate it. Thanks, Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 20:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Qwerty, it sounds like a good idea to me. But it's been moved to a Lua module (Module:Protection banner) which is beyond my level of knowledge, so it would probably be best to propose it on the module talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- For some reason, I was also thinking up about an alternate account named Callannec because of my misspelling of your username accidentally.
Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 19:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)By the way, I did ask that Module:Protection banner thing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 19:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- For some reason, I was also thinking up about an alternate account named Callannec because of my misspelling of your username accidentally.
Dead links
Hi Callanecc, Thank you for your message. I have tried to repair some links (maybe sometimes not hard enough?), but sometime the website does not exist anymore (e.g. http://www.gastronomiaenvenezuela.com/2012/04/rasgos-del-ron-de-venezuela/). So there is no way to repair it. How should we do?
Thank you
Lionel
- Hi Lionel maitre, have a look at the information here - Wikipedia:Link rot#Repairing a dead link. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Notification of ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Personal attacks by Claudebone reported by Jim1138. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Tech News: 2016-05
21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)