![]() Archives |
---|
Contents
A2 Milk
I have undone your revert of my edit to a2 milk as I have expanded on the article and justified why I changed it with a comment in talk page and citation in the article. If you are going to revert an edit from an established author and reviewer with several thousand edits, you should state your argument in the talk page first or comment on my talk page. Aeonx (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Your nonsense has been reverted. -Roxy the dog™ woof 15:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Bias POV have no place on WP. Please review WP:Dispute_resolution#Follow_the_normal_protocol. Aeonx (talk) 23:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- I agree. A correctly spelled biased PoV has no place here. Please read WP:MEDRS. Then you should learn how to read scientific papers properly -Roxy the dog™ woof 12:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- The amount of blatant factual errors in the article and your constant reverts without any real justification only accurately represents your inability to maintain a NPOV and lack of intelligence. People like you are counter-productive to Wikipedia. Aeonx (talk) 22:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Lets examine your wildly inaccurate statement above, shall we? I have made four edits to the article in the last six months, about ten in the last eighteen months, and yet you state that I do "constant reverts." More of your nonsense I suspect. Have you read WP:MEDRS yet? Learned to understand a scientific paper? I'm serious, it is a skill you appear to lack. Perhaps WP:CIR might be useful to you as well. and WP:NPA and WP:AGF. Now with regard to factual errors, for goodness sake correct them, nobody will object, but remember to use WP:RS or your edits wont last long. Feel free to ask for my help, and good luck in your sandbox. -Roxy the dog™ woof 20:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- The amount of blatant factual errors in the article and your constant reverts without any real justification only accurately represents your inability to maintain a NPOV and lack of intelligence. People like you are counter-productive to Wikipedia. Aeonx (talk) 22:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- I agree. A correctly spelled biased PoV has no place here. Please read WP:MEDRS. Then you should learn how to read scientific papers properly -Roxy the dog™ woof 12:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Bias POV have no place on WP. Please review WP:Dispute_resolution#Follow_the_normal_protocol. Aeonx (talk) 23:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Resolved yet?
Read's Island
Do you actually know the place? I've been waiting for a couple of years to tell somebody something about the Island? It wont improve the encyclopaedia though. -Roxy the dog™ woof 20:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Can you expand on that? Is the phrase 'Do you actually know the place' derogatory? Also; if you've been waiting to tell someone - tell them what? And at the end, 'it won't improve the encyclopaedia though' all seem like very negative statements. It they are not, then I'm sorry. But I'm not finished as of yet and if you have something to share then please do. Have a good day (evening). And yes; I do know the place. The joy of all things (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
I have added information and citations to the article.Happy? The joy of all things (talk) 00:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- I was never unhappy. Just thought it wiser to walk away. Thank you for your work on that article. -Roxy the dog™ woof 11:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Universal Medicine
Thanks for your reverts on this article. It seems a couple of new editors are making unqualified changes. I think the article should be semi-protected as it has a long history of agenda pushing. Where's the best place to apply for this? 79616gr (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Porky Pie of the day ...
I'm a "reality-based editor " ... yea, right. -Roxy the dog™ woof 17:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
BLP's proof of concept
BLP has released a few videos demonstrating an arc welder running amok proof that they can get power with hydrinos! [1] Maybe we should rewrite the article that they have successfully invalidated quantum physics? Jim1138 (talk) 20:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know what to say, I don't have the right words. I got into a tiny bit of bother once when referring to the subject of a BLP as "batshit insane" and if I let loose on this subject I'd probably get into a quantum amount of trouble again. Just when you think it cant get worse, it does, and I start to suffer from the 386 problem. That's me, that is. -Roxy the dog™ woof 21:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)