Crat tasks | |
---|---|
USURP reqs | 5 |
CHU reqs | 7 |
RfAs | 0 |
RfBs | 0 |
Overdue RfBs | 0 |
Overdue RfAs | 0 |
BRFAs | 10 |
Approved BRFAs | 0 |
No RfXs since 22:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |
Bureaucrat activity requirements (Q4 2015)
I have advised Bcorr, Brion VIBBER, Cimon Avaro, Cprompt, Ilyanep, Infrogmation, Jwrosenzweig, Raul654, and Secretlondon (by talk page [1] and email) that they have not met the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and that their bureaucrat permission may be removed if they do not return to bureaucrat activity within the next month. See Wikipedia:Bureaucrat activity for further information. –xenotalk 21:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- I noticed under "Bureaucrat activity requirements" the statement, "If the user does not return to bureaucrat activity...". Does this mean that an inactive bureaucrat can not just respond to this activity status notice by editing or doing admin tasks but must conduct bureaucrat activity if they want to keep their bureaucrat permission? I guess, at a bare minimum, that could involve posting on this noticeboard. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Xeno (et al), I just wanted to drop by and let you know that I probably won't be returning to Bureaucrat activity within that timespan. I haven't really been actively participating in the project for a number of years (just a few edits here and there) and don't really feel that I'm caught up enough on the latest community standards/guidelines/norms to really participate in any bureaucrat activities. Plus, I'm sure that the existing active bureaucrats have the responsibilities as well-covered as they were when I was around. Best wishes to all of you! :) – Ilyanep (Talk) 23:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- Noted. While I still participate in Wikimedia (especially Commons), most of what Ilyanep said above goes for me as well. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- I can only echo Ilyanep and Infrogmation's comments -- I still support Wikipedia, I edit occasionally (and plan Wikipedia-related events at my university), but I feel too distant from the current community discussions to be active as a bureaucrat (not that I ever set any records in that regard -- the community has always had an active core that manages most of the business). I am grateful to the people who asked me to hold the role, more than a decade ago; I hope that my few actions then as bureaucrat served the larger purposes of Wikipedia; and I am happy to defer to those active today with best wishes and much Wikilove. Jwrosenzweig (talk) 22:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Bot flag request
Can a cat please flag User:InternetArchiveBot with the bot flag. It is a subset of Cyberbot II and will run an already approved task of addressing link rot.—cyberpowerMerry Christmas:Unknown 19:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Done MBisanz talk 20:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Cyberpower678 and MBisanz:, can you please point to the WP:BRFA for this new account? — xaosflux Talk 23:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Cyberbot_II_5.—cyberpowerMerry Christmas:Unknown 23:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Additional discussion at Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval/Cyberbot II 5. — xaosflux Talk 23:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Cyberbot_II_5.—cyberpowerMerry Christmas:Unknown 23:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Cyberpower678 and MBisanz:, can you please point to the WP:BRFA for this new account? — xaosflux Talk 23:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)