Archives | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Contents
WP:CVUA
You have any plan to encourage more senior editors to join as a trainer in the CVUA? Cheers! Jim Carter 14:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think it's something the more 'senior' editors are interested in. They've generally moved on to Wikipedia's real life meetings and conferences or giving talks and lectures in schools and colleges or negotiating with the WMF for new software solutions, or become 'crats or Arbcom members. Enthusiastic younger editors are usually quite good at the CVU kind of thing as long as it doesn't turn into the 8th Graders' social party that we had to put a stop to 3 years ago! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps one way to get more CVUA teachers would be to see who posts regularly and accurately at AIV and offer them a job. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Chris!
I rarely ask someone not to post on my T/P, but the arrogance was insupportable. I am only human I fear. An excellent call. Regards, Simon. Irondome (talk) 22:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- You're welcome :) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
On granting a certain user PCR...
Hi Kudpung.
I've recently been helping out a bit at WP:RFPP (as you know, I recently became an admin). There's a certain user, William2001, who is requesting the PCR permission. I'm leaning toward declining the request, but I would like your opinion. Although they seem to technically meet the requirement at WP:RVW (albeit narrowly), I do have some concerns. For instance, on his user page he displays a "Veteran Editor" service badge, when in fact he is not close to meeting the requirements for that. (Not even I do.) Secondly, he displays the CVU badge on his userpage, although I can't find any indication that he ever went through the program. I'm a bit uncomfortable with that, since it may indicate hat collecting. His editing history is also quite sparse as of late (only about 50 edits going back to April or so). I see that you've posted on this user's talk before, mostly about AfC and how you thought he was too inexperienced for the job. However, since it's been a few months from then, do you think he would be ready for this permission? --Biblioworm 23:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง's abuse of Wikipedia:Protection policy#Content disputes on Panther tank
Apparently Kudpung กุดผึ้ง did not read or understand the constructive edits of 67.87.189.39 and, instead, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง semi-protected Panther tank under the false pretense of including communication in the edit summaries (what was the harm, even if it took place), and by doing so, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง abused Wikipedia:Protection policy#Content disputes and thus undermined the removal of logical errors, repetitions, and prolix descriptions from the page's lead, or, in other words, its constructive development.--67.87.189.39 (talk) 01:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- What a load of rubbish. Has this troll been blocked yet?--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)