About ME | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Archives |
---|
Contents
Page creation of Aneesh Upasana
Invite to Favonian, Tokyogirl79... Can I create this page? Josephjames.me (talk) 06:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've moved this to here since there is no page at that location right now. For the future, if you want to recreate the page you should go to the deleting admin's talk page. That said, I have no problem with you wanting to create this page. If it's OK with NeilN (who protected the page) or Favonian, I'll e-mail you a copy of the article's contents. I'd recommend re-writing it entirely since the prior version is strongly associated with sockpuppetry and might raise some eyebrows. (I don't think that you are, but I've found that it's easier to re-write than to try to keep sock-written article prose.) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Invite to NeilN... Josephjames.me (talk) 06:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey Tokyogirl79! Thanks for the reply! Hope you know my e-mail address :p... However, I can't seem to able to create this page as "only administrators can create it." Can you do something about it? Thanks again :) Josephjames.me (talk) 06:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've moved this to your talk page. It's easier to keep up with if we do this all on your talk page. Anywho, your e-mail address is linked to your account and will show up on the sidebar (left) under tools. It's enabled. To be honest, I don't think that the others will have a huge problem so I'll go ahead and just e-mail you a copy of the page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- @ Tokyogirl79, I have made an edit to the previous version and sent it to your e-mail. Please check! Josephjames.me (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'll try to check it - you can also post it to your draftspace at User:Josephjames.me/Aneesh Upasana. It'd be easier for all of us to keep up with it that way. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- Done! Josephjames.me (talk) 07:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- @ Tokyogirl79, should I submit it for review? Josephjames.me (talk) 08:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- @ Tokyogirl79, I have made an edit to the previous version and sent it to your e-mail. Please check! Josephjames.me (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- No need, the sourcing is strong and sound. I'll unprotect the page and move it myself. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- You're just so good! Thank you so much :D Josephjames.me (talk) 08:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Thanks Tokyogirl79. --NeilN talk to me 15:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
-
-
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
For salvaging a sockpuppet-created article on a notable person. Good job!
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC) |
License tagging for File:27tvm shotcuts GNT 1219827e.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:27tvm shotcuts GNT 1219827e.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:27tvm shotcuts GNT 1219827e.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:27tvm shotcuts GNT 1219827e.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nick—Contact/Contribs 15:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:27tvm shotcuts GNT 1219827e.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:27tvm shotcuts GNT 1219827e.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk page blanking
Hi Joseph, regarding this edit while it is typically okay to withdraw a comment from a talk page if nobody has responded, once somebody responds, that discussion should be preserved. The only real exceptions are to remove vandalism or general chatter that doesn't discuss the article. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Removing references
Hi, please don't remove references as you did here. Having a reference in the infobox helps users better spot vandalism. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Cyphoidbomb: I did that because the ref. was given down. Anyway, thanks! JosephJames 11:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)