Contents
- 1 Instructions
- 2 Speedy deletion
- 3 Holding cell
- 4 New listings
- 4.1 June 10
- 4.2 June 11
- 4.3 June 12
- 4.4 June 13
- 4.4.1 File:JackFellure2012.jpeg
- 4.4.2 File:DennisatWork.jpeg
- 4.4.3 File:Jondollah Logo.png
- 4.4.4 File:Abu Fatima al-Jaheishi.jpg
- 4.4.5 File:Ismael Zambada-GarciaDoS.jpg
- 4.4.6 File:IS insurgents, Anbar Province, Iraq.jpg
- 4.4.7 File:Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, King of Clubs.jpg
- 4.4.8 File:Abu Suleiman ISIS.jpg
- 4.4.9 File:Ibrahim al-Rubaysh.jpg
- 4.4.10 File:Osama bin Laden.jpg
- 4.4.11 File:Abu Muhammad al-Adnani.jpg
- 4.4.12 File:Abu Omar al Shishani.jpg
- 4.4.13 File:Abu Omar al-Shishani.jpg
- 4.4.14 File:Mugshot of Abu Ala al-Afri.jpg
- 4.4.15 File:Al-Shabaab fighters in Somalia.jpg
- 4.4.16 File:Al-Shabaab fighters.jpg
- 4.4.17 File:Ahmed Abdi Godane.jpg
- 4.4.18 File:Saif al-Adel in Afghanistan, Janaury 2000.jpg
- 4.4.19 File:Abubakar Shekau.jpg
- 4.5 June 14
- 4.6 June 15
- 4.7 June 16
- 4.7.1 File:The Original Neocities Login Page.png
- 4.7.2 File:The Neocities dashboard.png
- 4.7.3 File:The Neocities Dashboard.png
- 4.7.4 File:The Neocities Homepage.png
- 4.7.5 File:Lithuanian Air Force Captain Gregorius Radvenis.jpg
- 4.7.6 File:Majallat Shi‘r, Adonis, Al Khal.jpg
- 4.7.7 File:Index page of the 3rd edition of Shi'r Magazine,Adonis name in arabic at the top right, published in 1957.png
- 4.7.8 File:Elsie Kipling and George Bambridge on There wedding Day..jpg
- 4.7.9 File:Elsie Bambridge and Harold Yarrow.jpeg
- 4.7.10 File:Elsie at Batemans.jpg
- 4.7.11 File:Elsie Bambridge.jpeg
- 4.7.12 File:Intergroup Dialogue at University of Michigan, 2014.jpg
- 4.7.13 File:Kastelorizo airport aerial view.png
- 4.7.14 File:Kinga tube.jpg
- 4.7.15 File:34 Cards.jpg
- 4.7.16 File:Pastor Tunde Bakare, January2011.jpg
- 4.7.17 File:Pavia Resignole .png
- 4.7.18 File:Pavia Resignole Collapse.png
- 4.7.19 File:Pavia Tower Remains Closeup.jpg
- 4.7.20 File:Pay + Platform.jpg
- 4.7.21 File:Podiatric medicine symbol.jpeg
- 4.7.22 File:Sevastopol area.png
- 4.7.23 File:Vicksburg battle 2013 U.S. stamp.jpg
- 4.7.24 File:Watford FC Community Stand.jpg
- 4.7.25 File:Elton John Stand.jpg
- 4.7.26 File:Danny-Jaye---Rothenberg-mem.jpg
- 4.8 June 17
- 5 Footer
This page is for listing and discussing files that are marked as available under a free license or public domain, but have disputed source or licensing information. Files are listed here for 7 days before they are processed. Files that are tagged with a non-free template should not be listed here.
To list texts with copyright issues, please use WP:Copyright problems.
Instructions
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates |
Files |
Possibly unfree files (PUF) |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
Before listing, remember that files which are already marked unfree and used under fair use should not be listed here.
To list a file on this page:
I |
Edit the file page.
Add |
---|---|
II |
Create its PUF subsection.
Follow and list the file using |
III |
Give due notice.
Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using If the image is in use, also consider adding
|
Unlike Wikipedia:Files for deletion the primary purpose of this page is to ascertain the source and/or copyright status of a file. Therefore it is not specifically a vote to keep or delete but a forum for the exploration of the copyright status/source of a file and contributions should not be added solely in those terms.
Listings should be processed by an administrator after being listed for 7 days. Files that are accepted following this 7-day period should have {{oldpuffull}} added to the file talk page. If no objection to the file's deletion is raised, or no proof that the file is indeed free is provided, the file may be deleted without further notice after the 7-day period.
Note: Files can be unlisted immediately if they are indisputably in the public domain or verifiably licensed under an indisputably free license (GFDL, CC-BY-SA, etc.—see Wikipedia:File copyright tags for more on these).
Speedy deletion
Blatant copyright violations or files missing source or license information may be "speedied"
If a file is unquestionably copied from another website and no assertion of permission or fair use is made, the file may be speedy deleted under criterion F9 (formerly I9). Such files do not need to be listed here. Please tag the file with {{subst:db-f9|url=source URL}} and warn the user with {{db-copyvio-notice}}.
If a file is missing source, evidence of permission, or license information, place either use:
or
- {{subst:npd}} for No evidence of permission
on the description page to put the file in the appropriate category. After being tagged for 7 days, the file will be eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 4 or criterion 11 for images/media.
Please also notify the uploader so they get a chance to fix the problem(s). The templates {{subst:File source|File:file name}} and {{image copyright}} are made for this purpose, but feel free to write a message of your own. It is not necessary to warn the uploader about every individual file if they have uploaded several of such files, but at least one message telling them that files without source/license will be deleted should be given to each user.
If a file is indisputably non-free, and its possible use can comply with our non-free content policy, be bold and retag it as a non-free file using a non-free image tag instead of taking it to this page.
Please note that this page is not for disputing the fair use of already non-free media, but for the disputing if a freely licensed file really is free. Please take queries of this nature to Files for deletion or Non-free content review An archiving system was implemented July 2007. For older discussions, see the history pages. For all discussions from July 3, 2007 forward, see the Archive.
Holding cell
- These files have been listed for at least 7 days. Discussions should be closed following the steps here. Files that have been determined to be acceptable may be removed from this page.
New listings
June 10
File:Exterior of the Westfields Marriott.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Darkwind (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- File:Exterior of the Westfields Marriott.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
June 11
File:You're An Education reissue card.png
- File:You're An Education reissue card.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Screenshot of copyrighted film. Copyright was renewed in 1966. See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:You're An Education reissue card.png. Reventtalk 06:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Symbol found at the tomb of cyaxares.png
- File:Symbol found at the tomb of cyaxares.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be the same image as File:Symbol from the tomb of cyaxares.png, which has a different source and copyright tag and lacks evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 10:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Beyonce Knowles Carter.png
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- File:Beyonce Knowles Carter.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as own work, however no other information is given. Image is professional and has most likely come from another non-free source, that has not been provided. User also has multiple Copyright violations stated on commons talk page ThirdWard (talk) 14:47, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Livid DS1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- File:Livid DS1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image EXIF marked with © Ainsley Joseph. Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Whpq (talk) 20:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Whpq: - yeah, that complicates things, but rather than try to prove otherwise, I can just upload a new image. Or should we delete this one and upload a fresh one?Peboer (talk) 21:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Livid Base.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- File:Livid Base.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. This appears to be a professional product photo for a Livid product similar to File:Livid DS1.jpg and File:Livid Base2.jpg which are more clearly copyright violations. Whpq (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Whpq: - Should we delete this one and upload a fresh one? Or can I upload a 'new version'?Peboer (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
June 12
File:"((The Homie Teez)) modelling photo captured in a tree a his previous school Florida Park High School (picture by Mangaliso Mavimbela (ref)httwww.facebook.com-mangalisomavimbela (Photo taken, May 2015)(ref-).jpg
- File:"((The Homie Teez)) modelling photo captured in a tree a his previous school Florida Park High School (picture by Mangaliso Mavimbela (ref)httwww.facebook.com-mangalisomavimbela (Photo taken, May 2015)(ref-).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The file name contains the text 'picture by Mangaliso Mavimbela (ref)httwww.facebook.com-mangalisomavimbela' which suggests that it might not be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 12:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Upreti.jpeg
- File:Upreti.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says 'Copyright Protection belongs to Dr.A.R.Logesh'. If this is correct, then OTRS is needed. Note that Dr. A. R. Logesh appears to be the subject of the photograph, so it is very unlikely that he is the copyright holder. It is much more likely that the copyright is held by some other unidentified person. Stefan2 (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Muscletown.jpg
- File:Muscletown.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No indication that the creators of the mural have released it under a free enough license. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
June 13
File:JackFellure2012.jpeg
- File:JackFellure2012.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I suspect that the author did not actually take this photo. I believe he copied from the Prohibitionists website. William S. Saturn (talk) 00:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
File:DennisatWork.jpeg
- File:DennisatWork.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image is credited in the Albany Business Review to DONNA ABBOTT-VLAHOS. I suspect this is not the same person who uploaded the file. William S. Saturn (talk) 00:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Jondollah Logo.png
- File:Jondollah Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is no indication that this was published before 1923 as suggested by the copyright tag. This seems to be a recent logo. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Abu Fatima al-Jaheishi.jpg
- File:Abu Fatima al-Jaheishi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? Per that RfC, the file is to be treated as unfree on Wikipedia unless the file is in the public domain in Iraq, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Additionally, the uploader makes unsourced claims about the origin of the picture:
- The uploader claims that the picture was created by a citizen of Iraq, but the uploader also claims that the photographer is unknown. There are some unknown photographers who are not citizens of Iraq, so the uploader would need to provide more specific information about the photographer's identity in order to prove that the photographer is a citizen of Iraq. Plenty of non-Iraqi citizens fight for the Islamic State.
- The PD reason the uploader is quoting additionally requires that Iraq must have been the country of first publication and that the picture mustn't have been published outside Iraq within 30 days from publication in Iraq. Per Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al. (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2012), this means that the uploader is required to prove that the picture was first published offline in Iraq and not posted to the Internet within the first 30 days from publication. Stefan2 (talk) 22:58, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Ismael Zambada-GarciaDoS.jpg
- File:Ismael Zambada-GarciaDoS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader seems to claim that this picture was created by the United States federal government's police force's photographers, but the linked page states that the United States federal government's police force has no idea where this person is located. This implies that the picture wasn't taken by the United States federal government's police force but by someone else, meaning that the copyright tag is invalid. Stefan2 (talk) 23:01, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- It has the appropriate PD tag of being released into the Public Domain per the U.S State Department:"Unless a copyright is indicated, information on State Department websites is in the public domain and may be copied and distributed without permission. Citation of the U.S. State Department as source of the information is appreciated." - http://www.state.gov/misc/87529.htm#copyright. No copyright tag was indicated on the image. Therefore, it stands as being in the Public Domain. StanTheMan87 (talk) 14:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:IS insurgents, Anbar Province, Iraq.jpg
- File:IS insurgents, Anbar Province, Iraq.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? Per that RfC, the file is to be treated as unfree on Wikipedia unless the file is in the public domain in Iraq, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Additionally, the uploader makes unsourced claims about the origin of the picture:
- The uploader claims that the picture was created by a citizen of Iraq, but the uploader also claims that the photographer is unknown. There are some unknown photographers who are not citizens of Iraq, so the uploader would need to provide more specific information about the photographer's identity in order to prove that the photographer is a citizen of Iraq. Plenty of non-Iraqi citizens fight for the Islamic State.
- The PD reason the uploader is quoting additionally requires that Iraq must have been the country of first publication and that the picture mustn't have been published outside Iraq within 30 days from publication in Iraq. Per Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al. (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2012), this means that the uploader is required to prove that the picture was first published offline in Iraq and not posted to the Internet within the first 30 days from publication. Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That's not correct. There are no special rules for terrorist groups in copyright law. Besides, if a terrorist group can't be the holder of some material according to the laws of some country, then it just means that these rights are re-assigned to someone else, unclear who. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, King of Clubs.jpg
- File:Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, King of Clubs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader seems to claim that this picture was created by the United States federal government's police force's photographers, but the linked page states that the United States federal government's police force has no idea where this person is located. This implies that the picture wasn't taken by the United States federal government's police force's photographers but by someone else, meaning that the copyright tag is invalid. Stefan2 (talk) 23:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- Image was created by the Department of Defense, therefore it is in the public domain. The source provided proves this, and it is well known that these cards produced by the Americans prior to concluding the 2003 Invasion of Iraq were created by the U.S federal government in order to find high ranking members of the Saddam Hussein regime. StanTheMan87 (talk) 14:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Abu Suleiman ISIS.jpg
- File:Abu Suleiman ISIS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? Per that RfC, the file is to be treated as unfree on Wikipedia unless the file is in the public domain in Iraq, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Additionally, the uploader makes unsourced claims about the origin of the picture:
- The uploader claims that the picture was created by a citizen of Iraq, but the uploader also claims that the photographer is unknown. There are some unknown photographers who are not citizens of Iraq, so the uploader would need to provide more specific information about the photographer's identity in order to prove that the photographer is a citizen of Iraq. Plenty of non-Iraqi citizens fight for the Islamic State.
- The PD reason the uploader is quoting additionally requires that Iraq must have been the country of first publication and that the picture mustn't have been published outside Iraq within 30 days from publication in Iraq. Per Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al. (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2012), this means that the uploader is required to prove that the picture was first published offline in Iraq and not posted to the Internet within the first 30 days from publication. Stefan2 (talk) 23:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Ibrahim al-Rubaysh.jpg
- File:Ibrahim al-Rubaysh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader seems to claim that this picture was created by the United States federal government's police force's photographers, but the linked page states that the United States federal government's police force has no idea where this person is located. This implies that the picture wasn't taken by the United States federal government's police force's photographers but by someone else, meaning that the copyright tag is invalid. Stefan2 (talk) 23:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- It has the appropriate PD tag of being released into the Public Domain per the U.S State Department: "Unless a copyright is indicated, information on this Web site is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without RFJ's permission. We request that RFJ be cited as the source of the information and that any photo credits or bylines be similarly credited to the photographer or author or RFJ, as appropriate." - https://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/about-rfj/frequently-asked-questions.html. No copyright tag was indicated on the image. Therefore, it stands as being in the Public Domain. Additionally, this picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC) StanTheMan87 (talk) 14:38, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That notice is obviously not correct. Since the Department of State isn't the copyright holder, the Department of State can't release the picture to the public domain. Besides, there are no special rules for terrorist groups in copyright law. Besides, if a terrorist group can't be the holder of some material according to the laws of some country, then it just means that these rights are re-assigned to someone else, unclear who. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- It has the appropriate PD tag of being released into the Public Domain per the U.S State Department: "Unless a copyright is indicated, information on this Web site is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without RFJ's permission. We request that RFJ be cited as the source of the information and that any photo credits or bylines be similarly credited to the photographer or author or RFJ, as appropriate." - https://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/about-rfj/frequently-asked-questions.html. No copyright tag was indicated on the image. Therefore, it stands as being in the Public Domain. Additionally, this picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC) StanTheMan87 (talk) 14:38, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Osama bin Laden.jpg
- File:Osama bin Laden.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? Per that RfC, the file is to be treated as unfree on Wikipedia unless the file is in the public domain in Afghanistan, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Additionally, the uploader makes unsourced claims about the origin of the picture:
- The uploader claims that the picture was created by a citizen of Afghanistan, but the uploader doesn't list the name of the photographers. There are some unnamed photographers who are not citizens of Afghanistan, so the uploader would need to provide more specific information about the photographer's identity in order to prove that the photographer is a citizen of Afghanistan.
- The PD reason the uploader is quoting additionally requires that Afghanistan must have been the country of first publication and that the picture mustn't have been published outside Afghanistan within 30 days from publication in Afghanistan. Per Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al. (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2012), this means that the uploader is required to prove that the picture was first published offline in Afghanistan and not posted to the Internet within the first 30 days from publication. Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That's not correct. There are no special rules for terrorist groups in copyright law. Besides, if a terrorist group can't be the holder of some material according to the laws of some country, then it just means that these rights are re-assigned to someone else, unclear who. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Abu Muhammad al-Adnani.jpg
- File:Abu Muhammad al-Adnani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader seems to claim that this picture was created by the United States federal government's police force's photographers, but the linked page states that the United States federal government's police force has no idea where this person is located. This implies that the picture wasn't taken by the United States federal government's police force's photographers but by someone else, meaning that the copyright tag is invalid. Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- It has the appropriate PD tag of being released into the Public Domain per the U.S State Department: "Unless a copyright is indicated, information on this Web site is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without RFJ's permission. We request that RFJ be cited as the source of the information and that any photo credits or bylines be similarly credited to the photographer or author or RFJ, as appropriate." - https://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/about-rfj/frequently-asked-questions.html. No copyright tag was indicated on the image. Therefore, it stands as being in the Public Domain. Additionally, this picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:10, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That notice is obviously not correct. Since the Department of State isn't the copyright holder, the Department of State can't release the picture to the public domain. Besides, there are no special rules for terrorist groups in copyright law. Besides, if a terrorist group can't be the holder of some material according to the laws of some country, then it just means that these rights are re-assigned to someone else, unclear who. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- It has the appropriate PD tag of being released into the Public Domain per the U.S State Department: "Unless a copyright is indicated, information on this Web site is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without RFJ's permission. We request that RFJ be cited as the source of the information and that any photo credits or bylines be similarly credited to the photographer or author or RFJ, as appropriate." - https://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/about-rfj/frequently-asked-questions.html. No copyright tag was indicated on the image. Therefore, it stands as being in the Public Domain. Additionally, this picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:10, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Abu Omar al Shishani.jpg
- File:Abu Omar al Shishani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? Per that RfC, the file is to be treated as unfree on Wikipedia unless the file is in the public domain in Iraq, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Additionally, the uploader makes unsourced claims about the origin of the picture:
- The uploader claims that the picture was created by a citizen of Iraq, but the uploader does not indicate the name of the photographer. There are some unnamed photographers who are not citizens of Iraq, so the uploader would need to provide more specific information about the photographer's identity in order to prove that the photographer is a citizen of Iraq.
- The PD reason the uploader is quoting additionally requires that Iraq must have been the country of first publication and that the picture mustn't have been published outside Iraq within 30 days from publication in Iraq. Per Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al. (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2012), this means that the uploader is required to prove that the picture was first published offline in Iraq and not posted to the Internet within the first 30 days from publication. Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:08, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That's not correct. There are no special rules for terrorist groups in copyright law. Besides, if a terrorist group can't be the holder of some material according to the laws of some country, then it just means that these rights are re-assigned to someone else, unclear who. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:08, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Abu Omar al-Shishani.jpg
- File:Abu Omar al-Shishani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader seems to claim that this picture was created by the United States federal government's police force's photographers, but the linked page states that the United States federal government's police force has no idea where this person is located. This implies that the picture wasn't taken by the United States federal government's police force's photographers but by someone else, meaning that the copyright tag is invalid. Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- It has the appropriate PD tag of being released into the Public Domain per the U.S State Department: "Unless a copyright is indicated, information on this Web site is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without RFJ's permission. We request that RFJ be cited as the source of the information and that any photo credits or bylines be similarly credited to the photographer or author or RFJ, as appropriate." - https://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/about-rfj/frequently-asked-questions.html. No copyright tag was indicated on the image. Therefore, it stands as being in the Public Domain. StanTheMan87 (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Mugshot of Abu Ala al-Afri.jpg
- File:Mugshot of Abu Ala al-Afri.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claims two things:
- The photographer is a citizen of Iraq, and
- The photographer is an employee of the United States Department of State.
The vast majority of the employees ot the United States Department of State are not citizens of Iraq. Furthermore, this was almost certainly not created by an employee of the United States Department of State.
Additionally: See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? Per that RfC, the file is to be treated as unfree on Wikipedia unless the file is in the public domain in Iraq, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Additionally, the uploader makes unsourced claims about the origin of the picture:
- The uploader claims that the picture was created by a citizen of Iraq, but doesn't provide any evidence of this.
- The PD reason the uploader is quoting additionally requires that Iraq must have been the country of first publication and that the picture mustn't have been published outside Iraq within 30 days from publication in Iraq. Per Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al. (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2012), this means that the uploader is required to prove that the picture was first published offline in Iraq and not posted to the Internet within the first 30 days from publication. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- It has the appropriate PD tag of being released into the Public Domain per the U.S State Department: "Unless a copyright is indicated, information on this Web site is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without RFJ's permission. We request that RFJ be cited as the source of the information and that any photo credits or bylines be similarly credited to the photographer or author or RFJ, as appropriate." - https://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/about-rfj/frequently-asked-questions.html. No copyright tag was indicated on the image. Therefore, it stands as being in the Public Domain. StanTheMan87 (talk) 17:55, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Al-Shabaab fighters in Somalia.jpg
- File:Al-Shabaab fighters in Somalia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Missing evidence that this wasn't published outside Somalia within the first 30 days after publication in Somalia. Per Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al. (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2012), pictures which are uploaded to the Internet are published concurrently in all countries in which the Internet is accessible. Since the Internet is accessible in some countries which have signed the Berne Convention, this means that the uploader needs to show that the picture was first published in offline form in Somalia and then not uploaded to the Internet before at least 30 days had passed since publication in Somalia. The source given is a website, which is not any kind of offline publication. Furthermore, the website seems to have posted this picture less than 30 days after the picture was created, implying that it didn't remain offline-only for at least 30 days after the first publication. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:08, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That's not correct. There are no special rules for terrorist groups in copyright law. Besides, if a terrorist group can't be the holder of some material according to the laws of some country, then it just means that these rights are re-assigned to someone else, unclear who. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:08, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Al-Shabaab fighters.jpg
- File:Al-Shabaab fighters.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Missing evidence that this wasn't published outside Somalia within the first 30 days after publication in Somalia. Per Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al. (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2012), pictures which are uploaded to the Internet are published concurrently in all countries in which the Internet is accessible. Since the Internet is accessible in some countries which have signed the Berne Convention, this means that the uploader needs to show that the picture was first published in offline form in Somalia and then not uploaded to the Internet before at least 30 days had passed since publication in Somalia. The source given is a website, which is not any kind of offline publication. Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That's not correct. There are no special rules for terrorist groups in copyright law. Besides, if a terrorist group can't be the holder of some material according to the laws of some country, then it just means that these rights are re-assigned to someone else, unclear who. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- This picture was taken by members of a terrorist group. It belongs to an international illegal terrorist organization, and such pictures are typically not covered by copyright law (as they cannot legally copyright their material) and therefore it doesn't need fair use. It has no copyright. StanTheMan87 (talk) 15:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Ahmed Abdi Godane.jpg
- File:Ahmed Abdi Godane.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader seems to claim that this picture was created by the United States federal government's police force's photographers, but the linked page states that the United States federal government's police force has no idea where this person is located. This implies that the picture wasn't taken by the United States federal government's police force's photographers but by someone else, meaning that the copyright tag is invalid. Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- It has the appropriate PD tag of being released into the Public Domain per the U.S State Department: "Unless a copyright is indicated, information on this Web site is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without RFJ's permission. We request that RFJ be cited as the source of the information and that any photo credits or bylines be similarly credited to the photographer or author or RFJ, as appropriate." - https://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/about-rfj/frequently-asked-questions.html. No copyright tag was indicated on the image. Therefore, it stands as being in the Public Domain. StanTheMan87 (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Saif al-Adel in Afghanistan, Janaury 2000.jpg
- File:Saif al-Adel in Afghanistan, Janaury 2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? Per that RfC, the file is to be treated as unfree on Wikipedia unless the file is in the public domain in Afghanistan, which doesn't seem to be the case.
Additionally, the uploader makes unsourced claims about the origin of the picture:
- The uploader claims that the picture was created by a citizen of Afghanistan, but the uploader doesn't provide any information about the identity about the author, except that the author is a member of al-Qaeda. There are some members of al-Qaeda who are not citizens of Afghanistan, so the uploader would need to provide more specific information about the photographer's identity in order to prove that the photographer is a citizen of Afghanistan.
- The PD reason the uploader is quoting additionally requires that Iraq must have been the country of first publication and that the picture mustn't have been published outside Iraq within 30 days from publication in Iraq. Per Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Z. Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al. (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2012), this means that the uploader is required to prove that the picture was first published offline in Iraq and not posted to the Internet within the first 30 days from publication. Stefan2 (talk) 23:19, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Abubakar Shekau.jpg
- File:Abubakar Shekau.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader seems to claim that this picture was created by the United States federal government's police force's photographers, but the linked page states that the United States federal government's police force has no idea where this person is located. This implies that the picture wasn't taken by the United States federal government's police force's photographers but by someone else, meaning that the copyright tag is invalid. Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- It has the appropriate PD tag of being released into the Public Domain per the U.S State Department: "Unless a copyright is indicated, information on this Web site is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without RFJ's permission. We request that RFJ be cited as the source of the information and that any photo credits or bylines be similarly credited to the photographer or author or RFJ, as appropriate." - https://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/about-rfj/frequently-asked-questions.html. No copyright tag was indicated on the image. Therefore, it stands as being in the Public Domain. StanTheMan87 (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
June 14
File:Film Actor Nishant posing for camera.jpg
- File:Film Actor Nishant posing for camera.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See EXIF: Author = Ajay S, Copyright holder = Ajaysphotography, Owner of camera = Ajay S Thakur. Stefan2 (talk) 09:40, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Group of Eight logo 2014.png
- File:Group of Eight logo 2014.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The red stuff to the left of the text seems way too complex for {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. Stefan2 (talk) 11:19, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Andrew Novell 2015.jpg
- File:Andrew Novell 2015.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The Facebook page linked to prove the {{PD-author}} claim states "This photograph my be used for reproduction for publicity and editorial reason. I, Andrew Novell, hold the copyright for this use and grant its free distribution for the above reasons in all forms of electronic, and other media." That is not a release into the public domain. It is a conditional release for "publicity and editorial reason", which is not free enough for Wikipedia's purposes, and likely revocable. Additionally, unless he took this picture of himself, there's a chance the photographer actually holds the copyright. Nick—Contact/Contribs 15:23, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry. The copyright holder has contacted Permissions [Ticket#: 2015061410011397]. Hopefully this will resolve the issue. --Tombeverage (talk) 19:01, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- The OTRS email could be clearer, but I think it is OK.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
File:SurfaceHero.jpg
- File:SurfaceHero.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See c:COM:TOYS. Also, the toy picture and the rest of the picture seem to come from different sources, but only one source is given. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
File:SurfaceTablet.jpg
- File:SurfaceTablet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Photo of author Sloane Crosley 2015.jpg
- File:Photo of author Sloane Crosley 2015.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image previously published by Entertainment Weekly (here) and copyright holder listed as Caitlin Mitchell. If the uploader is that copyright holder, due to the previous publication, this should be verified through WP:OTRS. Nick—Contact/Contribs 16:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Gypsyviolins
- File:The Gypsy Countess Verona.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
If the uploader claims that the copyright was not renewed, then the uploader needs to reveal where the pictures were published so that this claim can be verified. Note that some of the pictures were created before 1923, but we have no evidence whether they were published before 1923. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:29, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
June 15
File:Paisano pete statue.jpg
- File:Paisano pete statue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Statue with unknown copyright status, see c:COM:FOP#United States. It is also not specified where the photograph comes from, see {{subst:nsd}}. Stefan2 (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Screen shot 2011-10-19 at 7.11.37 pm.png
- File:Screen shot 2011-10-19 at 7.11.37 pm.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The border at the top suggests that it is a screenshot of something, i.e. not own work. The file name suggests that it is a screenshot of something, i.e. not own work. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
June 16
File:The Original Neocities Login Page.png
- File:The Original Neocities Login Page.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a screenshot of a copyrighted webpage taken by the uploader. Taking a screenshot does not amount to self-work. Nick—Contact/Contribs 03:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:The Neocities dashboard.png
- File:The Neocities dashboard.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a screenshot of a copyrighted webpage taken by the uploader. Taking a screenshot does not amount to self-work. Nick—Contact/Contribs 03:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:The Neocities Dashboard.png
- File:The Neocities Dashboard.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a screenshot of a copyrighted webpage and browser software taken by the uploader. Taking a screenshot does not amount to self-work. Nick—Contact/Contribs 03:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:The Neocities Homepage.png
- File:The Neocities Homepage.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a screenshot of a copyrighted webpage and browser software taken by the uploader. Taking a screenshot does not amount to self-work. Nick—Contact/Contribs 03:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Lithuanian Air Force Captain Gregorius Radvenis.jpg
- The uploader is unlikely to be the photographer of a photo from 1937. Stefan2 (talk) 08:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Majallat Shi‘r, Adonis, Al Khal.jpg
- File:Majallat Shi‘r, Adonis, Al Khal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Index page of the 3rd edition of Shi'r Magazine,Adonis name in arabic at the top right, published in 1957.png
- File:Index page of the 3rd edition of Shi'r Magazine,Adonis name in arabic at the top right, published in 1957.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- 1957 was less than 95 years ago. Stefan2 (talk) 09:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- This is a picture of the index of my own magazine copy, it not art work, it have no commercial value.Nedal Ali Thabt (talk) 12:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Elsie Kipling and George Bambridge on There wedding Day..jpg
File:Elsie Bambridge and Harold Yarrow.jpeg
- File:Elsie Bambridge and Harold Yarrow.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the photographer was an employee of the United States government. Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Elsie at Batemans.jpg
- File:Elsie at Batemans.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the photographer was an employee of the United States government. Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Elsie Bambridge.jpeg
- File:Elsie Bambridge.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the photographer and object creators were employees of the United States government. Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Intergroup Dialogue at University of Michigan, 2014.jpg
File:Kastelorizo airport aerial view.png
- File:Kastelorizo airport aerial view.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Kinga tube.jpg
- File:Kinga tube.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:34 Cards.jpg
- File:34 Cards.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be an unpublished work for hire. No evidence that it was created before 1895. Stefan2 (talk) 12:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Pastor Tunde Bakare, January2011.jpg
- File:Pastor Tunde Bakare, January2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Pavia Resignole .png
- File:Pavia Resignole .png (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Pavia Resignole Collapse.png
- File:Pavia Resignole Collapse.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Pavia Tower Remains Closeup.jpg
- File:Pavia Tower Remains Closeup.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Pay + Platform.jpg
- File:Pay + Platform.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Podiatric medicine symbol.jpeg
- File:Podiatric medicine symbol.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Sevastopol area.png
- File:Sevastopol area.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Vicksburg battle 2013 U.S. stamp.jpg
- File:Vicksburg battle 2013 U.S. stamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence of publication before 1978. Stefan2 (talk) 12:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- It is an exact reproduction of a pre-dated painting. Adding an overlay of stamp price does not allow copyright to apply. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry, I missed the link to File:VicksburgBlockade.jpg. That one seems to be a little bit different, though. Is that enough to make the modifications copyrightable? Compare with [1]. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Checking in Photoshop, the stamp is artistically the same drawing but with enhanced colors (to brighten up the image). I am pretty sure I've seen cases before where this is not considered a new copyright. While colorization of black and white films can merit copyright [2], here we already have a colorized image, and the option has been to simply brighten/saturate the colors more, which is more mechanical than creative. --MASEM (t) 14:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've clarified the derivation from the USPS TheCivil War: 1863, The Battle of Vicksburg stamp is "a reproduction of an 1863 lithograph by Currier & Ives titled 'Admiral Porter’s Fleet Running the Rebel Blockade of the Mississippi at Vicksburg, April 16th, 1863.'" TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 19:30, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Checking in Photoshop, the stamp is artistically the same drawing but with enhanced colors (to brighten up the image). I am pretty sure I've seen cases before where this is not considered a new copyright. While colorization of black and white films can merit copyright [2], here we already have a colorized image, and the option has been to simply brighten/saturate the colors more, which is more mechanical than creative. --MASEM (t) 14:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry, I missed the link to File:VicksburgBlockade.jpg. That one seems to be a little bit different, though. Is that enough to make the modifications copyrightable? Compare with [1]. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Is the USPS claiming they have a copyright over the 'stamp'? -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
File:Watford FC Community Stand.jpg
- File:Watford FC Community Stand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Elton John Stand.jpg
- File:Elton John Stand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Incorrect source and author indicated.[3] No evidence that the indicated copyright holder and licence are valid. Stefan2 (talk) 13:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Danny-Jaye---Rothenberg-mem.jpg
- File:Danny-Jaye---Rothenberg-mem.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This file is, as they say on Commons, a DW. A derivative of someone elses, copyrighted, work. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
June 17
Today is June 17 2015. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 June 17 -- ()
If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:puf log}} to the top of the day's page.
Please ensure "===June 17===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Possibly unfree files page (the one you're on now) work.
|