Please add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign each answer. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them.
What motivated you to join WikiProject Deletion Sorting? Why do AfD discussions need sorting?
- For the first question, I started sorting debates because it is a way to assist the deletion process that I can easily fit into my everyday schedule, which tends to be a bit erratic. For participating in a discussion I need to set apart a minimum amount of time to research the subject, whereas for sorting I can make bursts of small, quick edits, and if for some reason I need to go do something else I'm not leaving anything half-way done. On the second question, sorting AfDs is helpful to the deletion process because it increases awareness over one crucial point of an article's lifecycle, as deletion marks a point where the content becomes unavailable, and thus no longer workable. I think AfD regulars may find the daily logs sufficient, but there are many editors that do not review AfD regularly that would be interested in being aware if an article within certain subject areas is nominated, or that would prefer not to have to review the whole daily logs just to find those discussions that they want to take part of — Frankie (talk) 09:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Deletion Sorting is Wikipedia's most active WikiProject when ranked by changes made to articles (second when bots are excluded). Where do these edits come from? How does the project coordinate such enormous activity?
- The amount of work required to keep all discussions sorted is by no means trivial, but I think those numbers might a bit misleading. Note that there will be two corresponding edits under the WikiProject space for each AfD for each list it's included in: one to sort the nomination, and one for the bot to remove it after closure. Given that most nominations are sorted in more than one list, that's 4 or 6 edits per nomination, and there are around 40-50 fresh nominations every day — Frankie (talk) 09:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
How is deletion sorting actually conducted? What templates, scripts, lists, and other tools are available to help sort AfD discussions?
- The sorting lists can be found at WP:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Flat or WP:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Compact (they're the same list, only the presentation varies). The process consists in transcluding the nomination in the appropriate list(s), and then including a notice on the nomination using the template
{{subst:delsort|ListName}}
. In addition to letting involved editors know that the debate has been sorted, this notice helps the closing administrator by telling them how long has the debate been advertised, which may take part in deciding whether to relist — Frankie (talk) 09:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
What kinds of editors tend to use the project's resources? Can new Wikipedians take part or is deletion sorting more appropriate for experienced users?
- New Wikipedians can simply take part on the process. Unlike mainspace categorization, which has a number of considerations and caveats when it comes to how to categorize an article, deletion sorting is a meta-process that simply aims to increase awareness, and it has minimal pitfalls. Sorting a discussion in a list that is completely off from the article's subject wouldn't be optimal, but all it would mean is that one just let people know about a discussion that they might not care about — Frankie (talk) 09:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
What similarities does the project share with WikiProject Stub Sorting and WikiProject Categories? Are there any projects that could make use of the templates, scripts, and tools developed by WikiProject Deletion Sorting?
One of the items on the project's to-do list is to "make better tools." What deficiencies exist in the current deletion sorting tools? What are the most important improvements that can be made?
Anything else you'd like to add?