Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates |
Files |
Possibly unfree files (PUF) |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page transcludes (or when this is not feasible, links to) all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
Speedy deletion candidates
The category is at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.
Articles
Centralized discussion | |||
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
|||
Proposals: policy | other | Discussions | Ideas |
Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.
|
|||
Datestamps on receipts in Canada
- Datestamps on receipts in Canada ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
- (Find sources: "Datestamps on receipts in Canada" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
Wikipedia is not a collection of facts. WP:NOT. Does not have enough coverage in reliable sources to verify and sustain an article. Does not pass WP:GNG. JbhTalk 01:15, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Kristy Dempsey
- Kristy Dempsey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
- (Find sources: "Kristy Dempsey" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
I was the one who removed the CSD, but I think this is justified. There was a claim to notability, for winning the 2015 Golden Kite Award, however that appears to be the only reliable source about her. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOUR. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
I seem to not be the right person to create this wikipedia page. Im in 8th grade and I am Kristy Dempseys son. I have had almost no experience with wikipedia except for some editing and thats all. It seems that when I attempted to create a wikipedia page about my Mother. I may not have had enough experience with finding reliable sources and and information as to why this subject has one or more claims for notability. Feel free to close the article down. But please, I would still like to somehow maintain it privately so i may do more work and further carry on my Wikipedia expertise. Thank you Joseph2302. It has been a pleasure talking with you. This is a great moment to cherish. TheAuthorWikiGuy (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- The problem isn't you, the problem is I literally couldn't find any reliable sources about her, which is the only reason I put it up for deletion.
- Also, I would support a Move to userspace. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
A.J. Tipping
- A.J. Tipping ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
- (Find sources: "A.J. Tipping" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
Unreliable sourced BLP of a screenwriter with no notable films to speak of. Wgolf (talk) 00:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
The High Learys
- The High Learys ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
- (Find sources: "The High Learys" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Has a lot of sources but most are not reliable. Band lacks charting, airplay awards. Releases are not on "important" label. Touring lacks coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 12:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Inclined to delete because my searches found nothing significant and notable and I don't think any of these links are significant and notable. SwisterTwister talk 20:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Archives Wales
- Archives Wales ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
- (Find sources: "Archives Wales" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Arb with the following rationale "You may be right but it deserves at least an AfD. Also, did you google "Archives Wales" with the quotes; plenty of hits". Well, I cannot find any hits which make it pass the above notability reqs, or Wikipedia:Notability (websites). It exists, it is linked to, but where is the in-depth coverage by independent sources? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep There are extensive links from eliable sources and some media coverage under its previous branding Archives Network wales. Martinlc (talk) 20:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Question. Are Archives Wales and Archives Network Wales functionally related? If so, there seems to be enough coverage to support notability. [1][2][3] --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Just a website. No notability. If it held archives itself then it would have notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:08, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Polish Jazz Recordings and Beyond
- Polish Jazz Recordings and Beyond ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
- (Find sources: "Polish Jazz Recordings and Beyond" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (books) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Theshinzu (creator) with no rationale. While the article sports an impressive collection of refs, they seem to be misleading. For starters, it's a recent book (2015), and virtually all refs are older, so what is it that they are suppose to be proving? As far as I can tell, they are references to other works on Polish jazz and such, irrelevant here. Outside a quote from the book jacket, there is no links to any reliable reviews, nor can I find any. Not all books are notable, and this one doesn't seem to be notable (at least, not yet). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- * Wikipedia:WikiProject Jazz notified. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Daniel Van Kirk
- Daniel Van Kirk ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
- (Find sources: "Daniel Van Kirk" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:WCS100 (creator) with the following edit summary: "Has more than a few references and I'm finding several more in a Google search. We better play this out via AfD before we toss this much content". Well, we are here now; I don't see any refs that add proper, reliable, in-depth coverage. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Piotrus, I think you'd be aware by now that AfD isn't for articles that don't have references that "add proper, reliable, in-depth coverage." AfD is for determining if a subject is notable or not and it doesn't appear that your nomination has done any of the WP:BEFORE work to determine that. A nomination that only points out my disagreement with a PROD seems as close to a non-argument as you can get.
- Here are a list of references I found in just a few minutes that aren't included in the list already found in the article. In depth interview, LA Weekly coverage of Van Kirk's work, Book about Van Kirk being a "notable", Subject becomes Chili's spokesperson.
- Outside of these references and the ones in the article, it seems clear to me, based on the articles about him or pointing him out in USA Today, Variety, LA Weekly, AV Club, and Splitsider, that the subject of this article plays notable role in area of comedy podcasts. He's also a current performer for Upright Citizens Brigade which was started by and produces notable members regularly. He also is a writer for the news website www.Cover32.com. I personally think that he satisfies WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO (point 2) with the independent and significant coverage form reliable sources but I also feel that the subject satisfies point 3 of WP:ENTERTAINER in that his body of work on specific podcasts has been the subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. WCS100 (talk) 01:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- More for Yahoo Movies and Variety about a show the subject writes. WCS100 (talk) 01:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- @WCS100: You are right this is about notability. And notability does not only require sources, it requires reliable sources. And what I am saying is not that this article is unreferenced (which, I agree with you, is not an AfD problem), but rather, than the existing references I see (including ones you presented) are not reliable, and thus do not help to establish the subject's notability.
- Let's start with your book finding. Following your link I cannot get a preview view, but the publisher is Emereo Publishing. From [5]: "So what Roebuck/Tebbo/ Emereo have done is take publically available and randomly selected Wikipedia articles and charge for it." I am afraid that your source is nothing but a printed fork of our article(s).
- Next, you find [6]. Well, it may be an in-depth interview; it also appears to be a podcast, an audio-version of blog.
- [7] LA Weekly passes RS test; but our subject fails at any kind of in-depth, substanial coverage - he is mentioned there in passing, in a single sentence plus picture caption.
- [8] Next, we have a short news blurb in a regional, niche website (" centralized agency founded to share knowledge of "bureau-approved" comedy throughout the Greater Los Angeles area and spread joy in the form of live comedy to all citizens we can possibly reach."). That fails WP:QUESTIONABLE and WP:AUD.
- So, unless you can present sources that show him passing GNG/ARTIST, AfD is the right place for him to be. And please, don't just spam links here, but provide a review of them: explain why the source is reliable, and the extent of their coverage of the subject (passing mentions do not count). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- More for Yahoo Movies and Variety about a show the subject writes. WCS100 (talk) 01:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I can't find any substantial sources about him. The best so far is the LA Weekly review of a show he starred in [9], but that's only one source. The refs here are either links to his "performances" (as podcasts), or mentions. The Comedy Bureau is a blog. Link #9 is unrelated (and an empty page). I can't find a reason to keep this, unless someone discovers a few more RS. LaMona (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Simple search shows me that this actor is widely known not only in his country. I believe that the requirements to finalize the article is enough. Shad Innet (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Jennalyn Ponraj
- Jennalyn Ponraj ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
- (Find sources: "Jennalyn Ponraj" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
Artist fails WP:MUSICBIO/WP:GNG. The only references are primary sources which do not help establish notability. I can find no in-depth secondary coverage in reliable sources. Nick—Contact/Contribs 00:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 5 albert square (talk) 00:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, I cannot find any coverage in reliable sources beyond the AllMusic discography. The page was thrice declined as a draft and then created in articlespace without addressing the notability issue. Huon (talk) 00:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Files
Possibly unfree files
June 10
Files for deletion
June 10
Categories
June 10
NEW NOMINATIONS
Redirects
June 10
Templates
June 10
Template:Tamaulipas Rural Radio
- Template:Tamaulipas Rural Radio ( · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)
All four radio stations in this infobox are part of Radio Tamaulipas which recently was consolidated into one article. There's nothing to go here. Raymie (t • c) 00:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Miscellany (WikiProjects, user pages, etc.)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#2015-06-10
Deletion review
10 June 2015
|