|
If you have a query about my alternate accounts, please see this page.
Contents |
Happy Wiki-Birthday
All the best on your Wiki-Birthday. Try not to get too drunk.Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 21:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! And congrats on being the first person to get here. ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Happy wiki birthday! -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Happy Wiki-Birthday! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • Coor. Online Amb'dor • 22:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Happy wiki birthday! -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
-
- Happy Wiki-Birthday!
Looks So Yummy! ( But is it edible?)
- Happy Wiki Birthday!--5 albert square (talk) 23:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Happy wiki birthday! —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 10:31am • 23:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Happy birthday! -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 06:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Happy wiki birthday! —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 10:31am • 23:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Happy Wiki Birthday!--5 albert square (talk) 23:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Just kidding :), Belated happy wiki-birthday! — Oli OR Pyfan! 05:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, guys! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:33, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
![Mail-message-new.svg](https://web.archive.org/web/20110330230406im_/http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Mail-message-new.svg/40px-Mail-message-new.svg.png)
You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
RfA
Hi Harry. I notice you haven't signed up for this. I know you're very busy and it may take up more of your time, but your input would be most welcome. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Unblock request of Jws
Hello HJ Mitchell. Jws (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, Sandstein 06:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- I know this is a crappy response given how long you've been waiting, but it's late and I've been on the single malt so I'm afraid I'm not in a position to look into it atm. I trust your judgement, so unblock if you think that's the best thing to do. Sorry I couldn;t get to this earlier. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply; I've granted the unblock request. Sandstein 22:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Noticeboard discussion
An editor you have been involved with at Nicole Kidman is the subject of a discussion at the Admin Notice Board here. As you have been an editor on the page in question, your comments may prove helpful. --Tenebrae (talk) 06:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Please remove this DYK record
Hello Mitchell, I certainly think its a biggest mistake that would happen on Wikipedia specially by its DYKadminbot. On 14 June 2009, a DYK was posted "Did you know ... that the Ice Hockey Association of India is hoping to prepare a team for the 2010 Commonwealth Games, despite the lack of any indoor hockey rinks in the entire country?", I'm completely shocked that how this DYK was posted on Wikipedia's main page; as you're also from the Commonwealth country, you can understand better that Commonwealth Games are summer games and Ice Hockey was never been a part of any revision of these games. Well lets just assume that ice hockey was a part of 2010 Commonwealth Games, but even in this case this fact is completely baseless as these games were organised in Delhi and if India didn't have even a single rink than how they were going to organise this event in games?. I mailed DYKadminbot but he didn't reply at all, so I request you to remove any record of such DYK, Thanks in advance. Bill william comptonTalk 13:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Erm DYKAdminBot won't be responding for quite some time, because, as the name suggests, it's a bot (ie an automated computer programme, not a person!). As for the entry, I don;t know the exact rules surrounding that sort of thing, but it's worth noting that it might well have been accurate in June last year when it was posted, even if it's no longer so. I would suggest you go to WT:DYK. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
What is it with you guys and babies?
Oh, seriously... now my own User:Baby Stupid has been blocked! Curiously, by User:Erwin, who hasn't edited since August 2010; he thought the username was "abusive". Not at all; the baby's simply named after his progenitor Bishapod, affectionately known as Little Stupid (a name nobody ever blocked). He looks just like Bishapod, too, see MONGO's photo. But I digress... could you unblock this baby, please? I guess I'm not supposed to. I've e-mailed Erwin with a request, but August 2010 doesn't sound any too promising... maybe he's left or something. I can't find any date for when the block happened. All the best, Bishonen | talk 16:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC).
- HJ, I tried to help with this, but it appears to be a global block. I left Bishonen some advice on her talk page, but it consists 95% of "I don't know how to fix it", so if you know more about global blocks than I, you should fix it, and then tell me how you did it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Revision delete request
Hi there Harry. Do you think you could delete the revision [1]? It's pretty libellous and offensive and does no use whatsoever for the article in terms of editing history. (I saw your name at CAT:RFRD so thought I'd ask you!) Cheers. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 17:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Gone. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Easter European issue?
Hi HJ Mitchell,
I'm not reall sure what the whole story is behind the EE thing, so I'm not going to ask for any specific "enforcement", or anything like that. However, I wanted to make someone aware of what's been going on at Occupation of the Baltic States. I put a note about what's been going on at ANI, here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Igny and "Occupation of the Baltic states". I'm trying to disengage from the whole mess, bu I didn't want to just walk away without saying anything at all. Regards,
— V = IR (Talk • Contribs) 19:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Strange first edits
I stumbled upon a new user whose first edits were tagging accounts as socks. source I have no clue where to post this but something about it seems wrong. cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 00:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- It's 1:00am where HJ is (he's a Brit), so he might not be online. I would repost this on ANI, where there are more eyes. Definitely something weird with this edits. - Neutralhomer • Talk • Coor. Online Amb'dor • 01:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- I attempt to avoid ANI but I will post it there --Guerillero | My Talk 01:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- HJ's page is on my watchlist, I've blocked the troll/sock/whatever. I used to have a batch delete script, but I removed it while debugging javascript problems. Guess I need to go back and re-add it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Try using Special:Nuke. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Cool, thank you. (too late this time, but I'll try to remember that for next) --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:38, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Floq for knocking this out --Guerillero | My Talk 01:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Good work here guys. I believe this can be marked resolved. - Neutralhomer • Talk • Coor. Online Amb'dor • 01:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Floq for knocking this out --Guerillero | My Talk 01:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Cool, thank you. (too late this time, but I'll try to remember that for next) --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:38, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Try using Special:Nuke. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- HJ's page is on my watchlist, I've blocked the troll/sock/whatever. I used to have a batch delete script, but I removed it while debugging javascript problems. Guess I need to go back and re-add it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- I attempt to avoid ANI but I will post it there --Guerillero | My Talk 01:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
JIDF
You may want to consider protecting the Jewish Internet Defense Force article again. It doesn't seem to be going well. Sean.hoyland - talk 17:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Three unhelpful IP edits in the five days since unprotection isn't that much. It's well-watched, so it shouldn't really be a big problem. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- I had hoped for the best as the article has improved significantly compared to the version the JIDF kept flipping out about. Now its being hit again from differnt IP range, Its the usual Einsteindonut/AppleTree/KatwomanUSA/Jewish Internet Meat Puppet Defense Force Tactics. Probably the same as earlier person as earlier today. Attacking Cussing out RolandR which is one of their favorite targets. Classic JIDF The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 17:29, 30 March 2011 (UTC)