User talk:Chaser
![]() Archives |
---|
Contents |
Lupin's Anti-vandal Tool
Hey Chaser. Regarding your post on village pump, I'm not quite sure about how to implement the codes correctly asides from adding more bad words for the filtered changes. Also, did you notice my post about it and respond using a new section, or did you just think of something unrelated? Because, I'm sort of wondering why the "non-admin rollback" stopped working. Does it work with you, by any chance? Thanks, ~ Troy (talk) 23:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Our posts are unrelated. I haven't used the java-script hacks you're talking about in years, but I did have a problem with the admin version (which I think is what the "rollbacker" user group gives non-admins) yesterday after installing the purge clock and assessment gadgets from Preferences/Gadgets. Removing them solved the problem. You might try stripping out any extraneous gadgets and your other javascript stuff and installing just Godmode light and see if that gives you functioning Javascript rollback. I have no idea if any of this will work; these are just the experiments I would do.--chaser - t 00:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
New page patrol
In response to your message on my talk page, yes, I am still interested. Thanks. --Winger84 (talk) 04:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
regarding Angel Locsin image
You should not have included [:Image:M2008_AngelLocsin.jpg|this image of Angel Locsin]. It has been deleted several times for Flickrwashing. The edit was suggested by a banned user. Thanks. Starczamora (talk) 09:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, I got fooled. Thanks for cleaning up after me.--chaser - t 02:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
"As of..." pages
In response to your creation of As of September 2008 – please note that following a change in guideline to WP:As of, the "As of..." pages are no longer used and creation of new pages is discouraged. Thanks – Ikara talk → 22:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK. I updated the two articles that linked to the page I created and deleted the page.--chaser - t 23:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thanks, hopefully that will stem the tide of new pages, thanks to your previous deletion message. When I get around to it the old pages will hopefully be removed once all appropriate conversions have been made... unfortunately there are a lot of them. All the best – Ikara talk → 14:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
reply Dumbasses Of Killarney
Hello , I am replying to a message that you sent to me before about my wikipedia page . And well I know that there are laws about saying that these facts must be true or whatever but they are I just created a wikipedia page as a user page and did not mean any harm in doing so I use this Wikipedia page to show my fans on youtube.com more about myself and my friends . I wrote this page for a long time and it would be such a shame for it to be deleted . I use this page simply for a link from my youtube account and mean no harm in doing so . sorry for any inconvience , Dumbasses Of Killarney
(plz do not delete this page plz) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dumbasses Of Killarney (talk • contribs) 21:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Dominion Academy of Dayton
I stumbled across this article by accident. And I think it should be deleted. Could I get your opinion please?--Supernerd 10 (talk) 22:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Probably. Deletion precedent is that high school articles are usually kept. Although this one is quite small, I found these brief articles about hosting an art show and one-act plays that could both be incorporated into it. Cheers.--chaser - t 01:04, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
LGRdC
I've indef-blocked the account (with autoblock disabled) just to cover all the bases. Stifle (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- By which I mean the original name, rather than the renamed one. Stifle (talk) 20:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
-
- Looks good. I think we've covered our bases.--chaser - t 20:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
rtv
I do agree with you. I've archived it, only because I don't like hiding anything in my talk page history. However, neither the username, its nicks nor a link to it is anywhere to be seen in the archived thread, so a Google search for him shouldn't stir it up. Let me know if you have any other thoughts on this and all the best, Gwen Gale (talk) 05:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- I think that's a great solution. Thanks, Gwen.--chaser - t 16:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
ITN
--Tone 14:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)