'''The Archives'''
*Archive 1 (Jan 10, 2005 - May 29, 2005)
*Archive 2 (May 29, 2005 - July 13, 2005)
*Archive 3 (July 13, 2005 - August 22, 2005)
*Archive 4 (August 22, 2005 - December 4, 2005) (up to and including brief mention of my RfA)
==Re: Edit count tool==
Nope, not yet. That's on my list of things to add next — see User:Flcelloguy/Tool, where I've added my future developments. However, it might take some time to do because of my limited time and the rather-more complex way of sorting namespace contributions. It'll be done, though. Feel free to leave feedback there. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
==Sources for Pileni language==
Hello, good work on Pileni_language, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. From what websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Pileni language? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET if you wish to review some of the different citation methods. Thanks! '''Lupin'''|talk|popups 03:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
:Looking good - thanks! '''Lupin'''|talk|popups 04:35, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
== Jewish history stub ==
Hi Tomer: Please see, and cast your vote at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion#.7B.7BJewHist-stub.7D.7D_.26_Cat:Jewish_history-related_stubs concerning Category:Jewish_history-related_stubs. Thanks. IZAK 10:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
:Hi Tomer - you seem to be confused about what is happening at SFD. No-one is talking about getting rid of the template and category, simply renaming them to be in line with the stub naming conventions. All that means is that {{tl|JewHist-stub}} and {{cl|Jewish history-related stubs}} would become {{tl|Jewish-hist-stub}} and {{cl|Jewish history stubs}}. It would be a bit silly having this category as "xxx-related stubs" when all the others are "xxx stubs" (which they will be within a week), or having "JewHist-stub" when all other history stub subcategory templates are of the form xxx-hist-stub. I'd ask you to please reconsider your vote. Grutness...''wha?'' 11:23, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
== Answer for you ==
at Talk:Kaddish#New_"text_of_kaddish". =P jnothman talk 04:34, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
== BDAbramson's RFA ==
Although my RfA is not over yet, I figured that since so many people (ahem) voted before it had been posted, I may as well start thanking people before it wraps up. Thanks for your support, and for the strength of it. No need to apologize for not nominating me sooner - I wouldn't have accepted any earlier (and barely accepted this one, early as it was in my book). I'll do my best as an admin to make the reality rise to the level of the dream. ''BDAbramson'' '''T''' 04:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
== Sepharad ==
What do you make of this Sepharad little jumble? IZAK 11:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
== Flying machines and Roylee ==
I saw here that you and dab have interacted with Roylee, a user notorious for editing a web of fringe theories into Wikipedia. A request for comments has recently been opened concerning this user: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Roylee. You might want to weigh in at its talk or maybe add a vote of endorsement or otherwise. Kind regards, — mark ✎ 13:07, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
==StargateTopics==
Very nice color choices! Thanks man! Staxringold 23:46, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
:If you don't mind my asking, why did you remove the link to Known Wraith? It is small now, but it can only grow larger as Atlantis grows past it's developmental stages. Staxringold 23:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
::Hah, thanks, all better. I think I'm going to try making a Stargate Babel-style Userpage template. :D. Staxringold 00:00, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
:::There you go. {{template|WPStargate}}. Staxringold 00:09, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
== Template:StargateTopics ==
If you want your colors, I won't fight you on them. :p You actually editted at the same time as me. I finished editting and it told me I had edit conflicts. I actually don't care too much one way or the other. The original colors hurt, but yours are fine. I chose the colors I used just so it was more consistent with the general color scheme, but I'm not especially concerned about the colors, so long as they aren't painful. (Question, what's the etiquette with this? Should I have replied on my user page, or here?) -- Dpark 00:00, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
== favor ==
TShilo12, I have just added a new section to Judaism_and_Christianity on "love." It is just a stub of a section. When you have time, would you go over it and add whatever additional material, detail, nuance, explanation on the Jewish conception/its meaning and importance for Judaism you think necessary? Slrubenstein | Talk 00:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
First, thanks. Second, of course you are right. I would oppose anyone deleting the Bloomian material, which I think is valid. I hope the lack of imbalance will be fixed by people ''adding'' to it, from other sources, and other points of view. And if you have more ideas about that, well, I encourage you to add. Slrubenstein | Talk 01:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
== RfA ==
thanks for caring enough to add another question. It is a fair question, and I have responded to it.--Alhutch 10:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
:Thanks for your support vote. It means a lot to me. I was beginning to fear that the RfA would be completely unvoted on! I promise to remain active in the future, and to state the reasons for my periods of inactivity if there are any. thanks again and see you around the wiki, Alhutch 10:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
::Thanks a lot for the nice comments. I very much appreciate your support. In the interest of full disclosure, I am a he, my name is Allan, and I voted support on your RfA just now (based on my judgment, not just because you voted for me). thanks again :-) Alhutch 10:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
:::I am a Quaker! thanks for asking! I will go ahead and put that on my user page.--Alhutch 10:41, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
::::no problem, it made me laugh. we quakers are hearty folk. :-) Alhutch 10:46, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
:::::lol :-) see you around--Alhutch 10:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
== User page broken ==
It seems your userpage is broken. The third image on the top is somewhere in the Babel boxes. Ucucha (talk) 13:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
:I don't have a very small resolution, I think (but I don't really know what it is, never interested in that). In any case, it's fine now :-). Ucucha (talk) 18:05, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
== Quote added by Ian Pitchford ==
A user has repeatedly added this quote: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amin_al-Husayni&diff;=29163676&oldid;=29162437
''Following the the war (and most notably during and after the trial of Adolf_Eichmann) the ''mufti's'' role and the extent of his influence with the Nazis were inflated in what historian Idith_Zertal describes as "a landmark in the process of the organized, explicit mobilization of the Holocaust in the service of Israeli politics and state policy, especially in the context of the Arab-Israeli conflict". Zertal continues:
"The transference of the Holocaust situation on to the Middle East reality, which harsh and hostile to Israel as it was, was of a totally different kind, not only created a false sense of the imminent danger of mass destruction. It also immensely distorted the image of the Holocaust, dwarfing the magnitude of the atrocities committed by the Nazis, trivializing the unique agony of the victims and the survivors, and utterly demonizing the Arabs and their leaders."''
*I pointed out to him that this is predicated on three unverified premises:
**a) The Mufti's Nazi-ties were exaggerated after the war.
**b) This was done by Jews/Zionists to further their malign aims, by gaining sympathy.
**c) There is a campaign to "explicitly mobilize the Holocaust in the service of Israeli politics and state policy."
*I put it to him that before he can add such a POV quote to the article he must provide the writers answers to ''how'', ''where'' and ''when'' this was done and not just the ''why'' (to gain sympathy by abusing the memory of the holocaust). jucifer 00:13, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
== Eggstone ==
It's back (for about a month now). I requested speedy deletion. -- Dpark 14:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, someone removed my db notice. Rather than take it directly to AfD, I decided to do some reasearch. Turns out that they're possibly notable, so I actually added to the page. -- Dpark 22:25, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
== Vote ==
Hi Tomer, please see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Etymology_of_the_word_Jew. Thanks. IZAK 10:44, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
== Administrator ==
Image:Gin_and_Tonic.jpg (talk) 22:09, 12 December 2005 (UTC)]]
Congratulations, you are now an administrator! If you haven't already, now is the time to read the Wikipedia:Administrators'_how-to_guide and Wikipedia:Administrators'_reading_list. If you have any questions, I'm happy to help, or you can ask them at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard. Best wishes, Warofdreams ''talk'' 12:56, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
:Mazel Tov! Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 15:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
::Excellent news indeed! I think you'll be great. :-) Antandrus (talk) 21:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Congratulations, and you're quite welcome! --Merovingian 22:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
:Congrats! And you get bonus points for having custom "thank you" messages, depending on the user whom you're actually thanking. ;) 20px ナイトスタリオン ✉ 22:02, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
::Congrats, Tomer, on a well-deserved promotion. ;-) SlimVirgin (talk) 22:09, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
No Whisky? Well, Gin is fine! '''!מזל טוב ''' -- Svest 22:33, 12 December 2005 (UTC) ''Wiki me up''
Congratulations! I know you'll do a great job. Jayjg (talk) 22:51, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
:Dude, you should have let me know you were on RFA! Congrats, and have a retroactive vote from me. Enjoy the game, and don't let the morons burn you out. JFW | T@lk 23:00, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
==Congratulations==
Congratulations on your promotion to administrator. Crotalus horridus 00:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
*Congrats from me too. You'll be a fine admin. A word of caution though - take on board what was said by those who opposed - healthy criticism can be useful. But congrats again - enjoy! Grutness...''wha?'' 02:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
:Congratulations Tomer on your new mop! --MPerel ( talk | contrib) 02:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
::I missed the voting (sorry!) but congrats anyway! Its good to see more Wisconsinites with the mop, now if you could just help me find a picture of Cheese_curds for the article (as someone living outside the state, they are surprisingly unavailable) --Goodoldpolonius2 02:45, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
*Congratulations. It's a red letter day for the project. An impressive display of support for you too. FeloniousMonk 02:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
*congrats, and thanks again for your vote on my RfA.--Alhutch 04:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
* Let me add my congratulations to the list. Guettarda 04:37, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
* Yup - congratulations - I can smell the shawarma already! Ramallite (talk) 05:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
*Congratulations on your adminship and your are welcome for the message.--'''''Dak''''ota''''' '''t '''e''' 06:47, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
*Congratulations Tomer, I knew you would make it! I am sure you wont be hearing any complaints from me. It was an honour (excuse the "u") nominating you. Thanks for the candy! '''''Banes''''' 06:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
*Mazel Tov ! IZAK 15:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
==Anabolics==
I have no idea about chemistry. It's ''the'' only subject I hated at school. So don't ask me about renaming or moving. As far as copyvio goes - as long as it's not on Wiki, I am happy. BTW, congrats on new admin powers. Renata3 04:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
:Redirecting sounds good :) Renata3 04:09, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
::Ah, well, kindergarden. And now you have the power are the nanny :) Renata3 04:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
== Rejection of Tanakh ==
Hi Tomer: Please see and vote at Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_December_12#Category:Hebrew_Bible where it is beeing suggested that the word "Tanakh" is "not neutral", and I am trying to explain to them that it is in keeping with NPOV to convey the way Judaism uses certain terms to describe the Hebrew Bible/Tanakh. Thanks. IZAK 15:31, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
== Orioane's RfA ==
Image:Tournesol.png
Hey {{PAGENAME}}! Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. To my amazement there were no negative or neutral votes and the result was '''(28/0/0)'''. I am now an administrator so I'll try and do my best in this new position. I'll be happy to answer any comments or requests from you. Thanks one more time, Mihai -talk 20:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)