Would you be willing to pool your oppose "votes" together with Draco? WP:FAMILY in this case may apply as the RFA policies state that editors may cast only a single "vote". It did appear that Draco did disappear for a bit and you both share the same oppose rationale over the same argument. Mkdwtalk 07:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No. What the fuck are you worried about? Firstly, this RfA is running at 96% support. She'll sail through it. Secondly, I explicitly drew attention to the WP:FAMILY situation in my vote. Do you think our bureaucrats are incapable of mentally processing that situation? Thirdly, my wife and I are two different people. We often disagree. We don't on this one. Fourth, I have been here for nearly eight years. I have done enough here to have earned the right of having my own vote. I am not an adjunct to my wife. AndreasJN466 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Swearing is not necessary. If an IP had voted or another well established editor voted twice I would have pointed it out all the same against my interpretation of the rules and guidelines with no ill will. I'm not concerned about whether or not Cindamuse's RfA will succeed over one or two votes. The basis of my question was not out of concern for the mental abilities of our bureaucrats and I was not doubtful of your third point. The second paragraph of WP:FAMILY discusses closely related accounts as observing the relevant policies as being a single account. As you know, in addition to your marriage, your two accounts share many common interactions together. For example, approximately 40% of Draco's edits are to pages you have also edited. I simply wanted to ask the question and did not intend to belittle you. You may disregard my question as it was only a question. Mkdwtalk 09:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Let it rest, Jayen made it explicitly clear of the family tie. No need to hound him over it.--v/r - TP 15:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]