Stanovc
- Stanovc (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
07 December 2010
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Whatelsetodo (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bardyllis (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Nxenes i dalluar (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
User:Whatelsetodo is a known sock of the banned User:Stanovc, a prolific sockpuppeteer. However, it appears he was re-admitted to the community per this [1]. Why he was re-admitted, I have no idea. However, he has resumed creating alternate accounts and generally being disruptive. User:Bardyllis appears to be a sock, as it is a new account that he exhibits identical interests, namely creating and editing "Illyrian X" type articles [2], a highly obscure topic where no one else has ever contributed this prolifically. His other interest is mountains (e.g. Prokletije, Maja Jezercë), one of the main interests of Stanovc/Whatelsetodo. Evidently piqued that I nominated one of his articles for deletion [3] he created the Nxenes i dalluar (talk · contribs) account, with which he now follows me around. Nxenes i dalluar is obviously not a new account, since all he does is obviously follow me from my contribs log. Note how I notified Whatelsetodo of the deletion, Bardyllis removes the AfD tag, but it is Nxenes i dalluar that votes at the AfD. Also note that all accounts lack a userpage, a similarity they all share with Stanovc and his previous socks.
Here Bardyllis says he is the creator of Illyrian history [4], but from the article history it is obvious that the creator is Whatelsetodo [5], therefore it is proven that these two are the same account. Athenean (talk) 20:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk endorsed - Something is going on here. CU will clear it up. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 20:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Administrator note Brandon blocked Whatelsetodo; I tagged it, and then also blocked and tagged Bardyllis. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Stanovc (talk · contribs) is
Confirmed as Whatelsetodo and Bardyllis. Nxenes i dalluar is
Unrelated. Brandon (talk) 11:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
11 December 2010
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Fierza (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Heathclifff (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Got a note on my talk page about it. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 00:40, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note Blocked and tagged; really just opened this to keep a history. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 00:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: Just a few hours after I dealt with the previous sock, I got a note about another user and have listed them above. I'm adding a CU to see if we can get an IP block or something on this, 'cause this editor is clearly not giving up. In the meantime, I've protected an article that's well known as a spot for this editor. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 22:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Likely
- Stanovc (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fierza (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Heathclifff (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Range is too wide for effective rangeblocking. -- Avi (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing more to do here. Closing. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 02:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
18 December 2010
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Wheneverwhenever (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Per listing on my talk page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note Blocked and tagged, just doing the paperwork. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:43, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
23 December 2010
- Suspected sockpuppets
- KimeteFehmi (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Listing per discussion on my talk page. Seems exceedingly likely. CU check is for sleepers, and also to see if we can get some form of long-term block, as this has been an issue for some time. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Likely match to Wheneverwhenever (talk · contribs). A rangeblock is a no-go, however. TNXMan 16:05, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- Blocked. Nakon 17:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
31 December 2010
- Suspected sockpuppets
- GranitAlbana (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Duck block, just doing the paperwork. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 01:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
06 January 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Selasalle (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Recreating Devollite pottery, an article deleted awhile back. I was notified about this on my talk page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note Blocked and tagged. Article deleted and salted. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
31 December 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Serbiakos (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Re-creation of Illyrian States - seems pretty obvious to me but I'm listing it here because the user Serbiakos has existed for quite a while. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note That's almost certainly him. I've blocked and tagged the sock on behavioral grounds. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:14, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
4 January 2012
- Dinaric (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.
Roman conquest of northern Illyria appeared out of the blue. Not only do those things rarely, if ever, happen, but I distinctly remember seeing an article like this before. I just can't put my finger on the title used at the time... --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- While the user might not be a new user, your evidence presented above does not justify running a check. Please provide diffs to support your claims. Tiptoety talk 22:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Clerk note: Uh, alright. I'm going to close this for now, then. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)