Openbluesky
- Openbluesky (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
06 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Clearlighty (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Innerbeautyfc (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Markelmonument (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Angelsteps (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) Added per [1]. AGK [•] 10:53, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Clubhrt (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
All four named accounts were created on the same day. The first 2 (Clearlighty & Innerbeautryfc) to continue reverts started by the IP addresses on Joel Osteen--specifically, the addition of negative information on a BLP supported by a blog (or, by what xe/they call a "professional freelance journalist"). The fourth (Markelmonument), left this message on an involved user's talk page, warning xyr of the creation of the "Joel Osteen Wikipedia Censorship Watch group". At a minimum, these four users are a meatpuppet gang, and could probably be blocked accordingly. But I'd like a CU to see if we can get an indication if they are all just one editor or multiple. If they are related, please run a sleeper check as there's no reason to believe that this is all of the related accounts. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Looking back to June, there were other IPs trying to make similar edits; since they can't be connected by CU, I won't list, but this definitely could be part of some longer-term disruption/POV pushing. Or maybe it's just the "Freelance journalist" trying to promote his work...clearly no bueno, though. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk endorsed - I'm expecting to have 1 or 2 come out as meats, but some of these are clearly not new to WP + this is fishy. -- DQ (t) (e) 06:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Technically Likely that Clearlighty, Innerbeautyfc, Openbluesky, and Angelsteps are the same. Markelmonument is Possible. From a behavioural view, the link is probably solid enough to block. No sleepers, and n/c on the IPs, but if trouble recurs at Joel Osteen come back and see us. AGK [•] 11:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Clerk note: Extended the block on the two Tor nodes and blocked the lot, they just need some tagging. -- DQ (t) (e) 20:51, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- DQ blocked; I tagged. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:08, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Administrator note We don't need to check the latest addition; it's clear that they're a sock of somebody. And now they're blocked. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)